Terminating cases of flooding
Authors:
Walter Hussak,
Amitabh Trehan
Abstract:
Basic synchronous flooding proceeds in rounds. Given a finite undirected (network) graph $G$, a set of sources $I \subseteq G$ initiate flooding in the first round by every node in $I$ sending the same message to all of its neighbours. In each subsequent round, nodes send the message to all of their neighbours from which they did not receive the message in the previous round. Flooding terminates w…
▽ More
Basic synchronous flooding proceeds in rounds. Given a finite undirected (network) graph $G$, a set of sources $I \subseteq G$ initiate flooding in the first round by every node in $I$ sending the same message to all of its neighbours. In each subsequent round, nodes send the message to all of their neighbours from which they did not receive the message in the previous round. Flooding terminates when no node in $G$ sends a message in a round. The question of termination has not been settled - rather, non-termination is implicitly assumed to be possible.
We show that flooding terminates on every finite graph. In the case of a single source $g_0$, flooding terminates in $e$ rounds if $G$ is bipartite and $j$ rounds with $e < j \leq e+d+1$ otherwise, where $e$ and $d$ are the eccentricity of $g_0$ and diameter of $G$ respectively. For communication/broadcast to all nodes, this is asymptotically time optimal and obviates the need for construction and maintenance of spanning structures. We extend to dynamic flooding initiated in multiple rounds with possibly multiple messages. The cases where a node only sends a message to neighbours from which it did not receive {\it any} message in the previous round, and where a node sends some highest ranked message to all neighbours from which it did not receive {\it that} message in the previous round, both terminate. All these cases also hold if the network graph loses edges over time. Non-terminating cases include asynchronous flooding, flooding where messages have fixed delays at edges, cases of multiple-message flooding and cases where the network graph acquires edges over time.
△ Less
Submitted 12 September, 2020;
originally announced September 2020.
On The Termination of a Flooding Process
Authors:
Walter Hussak,
Amitabh Trehan
Abstract:
Flooding is among the simplest and most fundamental of all distributed network algorithms. A node begins the process by sending a message to all its neighbours and the neighbours, in the next round forward the message to all the neighbours they did not receive the message from and so on. We assume that the nodes do not keep a record of the flooding event. We call this amnesiac flooding (AF). Since…
▽ More
Flooding is among the simplest and most fundamental of all distributed network algorithms. A node begins the process by sending a message to all its neighbours and the neighbours, in the next round forward the message to all the neighbours they did not receive the message from and so on. We assume that the nodes do not keep a record of the flooding event. We call this amnesiac flooding (AF). Since the node forgets, if the message is received again in subsequent rounds, it will be forwarded again raising the possibility that the message may be circulated infinitely even on a finite graph. As far as we know, the question of termination for such a flooding process has not been settled - rather, non-termination is implicitly assumed.
In this paper, we show that synchronous AF always terminates on any arbitrary finite graph and derive exact termination times which differ sharply in bipartite and non-bipartite graphs. Let $G$ be a finite connected graph. We show that synchronous AF from a single source node terminates on $G$ in $e$ rounds, where $e$ is the eccentricity of the source node, if and only if $G$ is bipartite. For non-bipartite $G$, synchronous AF from a single source terminates in $j$ rounds where $e < j \leq e+d+1$ and $d$ is the diameter of $G$. This limits termination time to at most $d$ and at most $2d + 1$ for bipartite and non-bipartite graphs respectively. If communication/broadcast to all nodes is the motivation, our results show that AF is asymptotically time optimal and obviates the need for construction and maintenance of spanning structures like spanning trees. The clear separation in the termination times of bipartite and non-bipartite graphs also suggests mechanisms for distributed discovery of the topology/distances in arbitrary graphs.
For comparison, we show that, in asynchronous networks, an adaptive adversary can force AF to be non-terminating.
△ Less
Submitted 16 July, 2019;
originally announced July 2019.
