Emotional Framing in the Spreading of False and True Claims
Authors:
Akram Sadat Hosseini,
Steffen Staab
Abstract:
The explosive growth of online misinformation, such as false claims, has affected the social behavior of online users. In order to be persuasive and mislead the audience, false claims are made to trigger emotions in their audience. This paper contributes to understanding how misinformation in social media is shaped by investigating the emotional framing that authors of the claims try to create for…
▽ More
The explosive growth of online misinformation, such as false claims, has affected the social behavior of online users. In order to be persuasive and mislead the audience, false claims are made to trigger emotions in their audience. This paper contributes to understanding how misinformation in social media is shaped by investigating the emotional framing that authors of the claims try to create for their audience. We investigate how, firstly, the existence of emotional framing in the claims depends on the topic and credibility of the claims. Secondly, we explore how emotionally framed content triggers emotional response posts by social media users, and how emotions expressed in claims and corresponding users' response posts affect their sharing behavior on social media. Analysis of four data sets covering different topics (politics, health, Syrian war, and COVID-19) reveals that authors shape their claims depending on the topic area to pass targeted emotions to their audience. By analysing responses to claims, we show that the credibility of the claim influences the distribution of emotions that the claim incites in its audience. Moreover, our analysis shows that emotions expressed in the claims are repeated in the users' responses. Finally, the analysis of users' sharing behavior shows that negative emotional framing such as anger, fear, and sadness of false claims leads to more interaction among users than positive emotions. This analysis also reveals that in the claims that trigger happy responses, true claims result in more sharing compared to false claims.
△ Less
Submitted 29 March, 2023;
originally announced March 2023.
Does the First Mover Advantage Exist on GitHub?
Authors:
Aditya Mehta,
Arun Paudyal,
Atul Sharma,
Zyanya Ambros,
Ipek Baris,
Jun Sun,
Oul Han,
Akram Sadat Hosseini
Abstract:
Collaborative consensus-finding is an integral element of many Web services and greatly determines the quality of information, content, and products that are available through the Web. That also means that the dynamics of democratic consensus-finding strengthen collective resilience against potential threats that attempt to degrade information, content, and products and affect Web data, users, beh…
▽ More
Collaborative consensus-finding is an integral element of many Web services and greatly determines the quality of information, content, and products that are available through the Web. That also means that the dynamics of democratic consensus-finding strengthen collective resilience against potential threats that attempt to degrade information, content, and products and affect Web data, users, behaviors, and even beyond as well as offline life. Even on Web platforms that are open to all, the influence of some first mover authors may shape future discussion and collaboration, which is comparable to academic citation networks for instance. In a social coding network such as GitHub, activities of a set of users can have influence on other users who can get interested in further actions, possibly contributing to a new project together with influential users. In this paper, we analyze the effect of contribution activities on gaining influence in this and comparable networks that provide users the functionality and aims for reaching collaborative goals on the Web.For this purpose, we present an empirical approach to identify the top influential users by using network features and contribution characteristics, which we find in existing and newly collected data set. We find that early adopter dynamics exist in the GitHub community, where early adopters have more followers in the end as expected. However, we also see counterexamples that arise due to the social networking behavior of late adopters, and due to the aging effect of older repositories and users. We publicly share the source code and the data sets for reproducing our paper.
△ Less
Submitted 3 June, 2020;
originally announced June 2020.
