Simulating User Diversity in Task-Oriented Dialogue Systems using Large Language Models
Authors:
Adnan Ahmad,
Stefan Hillmann,
Sebastian Möller
Abstract:
In this study, we explore the application of Large Language Models (LLMs) for generating synthetic users and simulating user conversations with a task-oriented dialogue system and present detailed results and their analysis. We propose a comprehensive novel approach to user simulation technique that uses LLMs to create diverse user profiles, set goals, engage in multi-turn dialogues, and evaluate…
▽ More
In this study, we explore the application of Large Language Models (LLMs) for generating synthetic users and simulating user conversations with a task-oriented dialogue system and present detailed results and their analysis. We propose a comprehensive novel approach to user simulation technique that uses LLMs to create diverse user profiles, set goals, engage in multi-turn dialogues, and evaluate the conversation success. We employ two proprietary LLMs, namely GPT-4o and GPT-o1 (Achiam et al., 2023), to generate a heterogeneous base of user profiles, characterized by varied demographics, multiple user goals, different conversational styles, initial knowledge levels, interests, and conversational objectives. We perform a detailed analysis of the user profiles generated by LLMs to assess the diversity, consistency, and potential biases inherent in these LLM-generated user simulations. We find that GPT-o1 generates more heterogeneous user distribution across most user attributes, while GPT-4o generates more skewed user attributes. The generated set of user profiles are then utilized to simulate dialogue sessions by interacting with a task-oriented dialogue system.
△ Less
Submitted 18 February, 2025;
originally announced February 2025.
Factors in Crowdsourcing for Evaluation of Complex Dialogue Systems
Authors:
Annalena Aicher,
Stefan Hillmann,
Isabel Feustel,
Thilo Michael,
Sebastian Möller,
Wolfgang Minker
Abstract:
In the last decade, crowdsourcing has become a popular method for conducting quantitative empirical studies in human-machine interaction. The remote work on a given task in crowdworking settings suits the character of typical speech/language-based interactive systems for instance with regard to argumentative conversations and information retrieval. Thus, crowdworking promises a valuable opportunit…
▽ More
In the last decade, crowdsourcing has become a popular method for conducting quantitative empirical studies in human-machine interaction. The remote work on a given task in crowdworking settings suits the character of typical speech/language-based interactive systems for instance with regard to argumentative conversations and information retrieval. Thus, crowdworking promises a valuable opportunity to study and evaluate the usability and user experience of real humans in interactions with such interactive systems. In contrast to physical attendance in laboratory studies, crowdsourcing studies offer much more flexible and easier access to large numbers of heterogeneous participants with a specific background, e.g., native speakers or domain expertise. On the other hand, the experimental and environmental conditions as well as the participant's compliance and reliability (at least better monitoring of the latter) are much better controllable in a laboratory.
This paper seeks to present a (self-)critical examination of crowdsourcing-based studies in the context of complex (spoken) dialogue systems. It describes and discusses observed issues in crowdsourcing studies involving complex tasks and suggests solutions to improve and ensure the quality of the study results. Thereby, our work contributes to a better understanding and what needs to be considered when designing and evaluating studies with crowdworkers for complex dialogue systems.
△ Less
Submitted 17 November, 2024;
originally announced November 2024.
