Showing 1–19 of 19 results for author: Hella, L

Regular Representations of Uniform TC^0

Authors: Lauri Hella, Juha Kontinen, Kerkko Luosto

Abstract: The circuit complexity class DLOGTIME-uniform AC^0 is known to be a modest subclass of DLOGTIME-uniform TC^0. The weakness of AC^0 is caused by the fact that AC^0 is not closed under restricting AC^0-computable queries into simple subsequences of the input. Analogously, in descriptive complexity, the logics corresponding to DLOGTIME-uniform AC^0 do not have the relativization property and hence th… ▽ More The circuit complexity class DLOGTIME-uniform AC^0 is known to be a modest subclass of DLOGTIME-uniform TC^0. The weakness of AC^0 is caused by the fact that AC^0 is not closed under restricting AC^0-computable queries into simple subsequences of the input. Analogously, in descriptive complexity, the logics corresponding to DLOGTIME-uniform AC^0 do not have the relativization property and hence they are not regular. This weakness of DLOGTIME-uniform AC^0 has been elaborated in the line of research on the Crane Beach Conjecture. The conjecture (which was refuted by Barrington, Immerman, Lautemann, Schweikardt and Th{é}rien) was that if a language L has a neutral letter, then L can be defined in first-order logic with the collection of all numerical built-in relations, if and only if L can be already defined in FO with order. In the first part of this article we consider logics in the range of AC^0 and TC^0. First we formulate a combinatorial criterion for a cardinality quantifier C_S implying that all languages in DLOGTIME-uniform TC^0 can be defined in FO(C_S). For instance, this criterion is satisfied by C_S if S is the range of some polynomial with positive integer coefficients of degree at least two. In the second part of the paper we first adapt the key properties of abstract logics to accommodate built-in relations. Then we define the regular interior R-int(L) and regular closure R-cl(L), of a logic L, and show that the Crane Beach Conjecture can be interpreted as a statement concerning the regular interior of first-order logic with built-in relations B. We show that if B={+}, or B contains only unary relations besides the order, then R-int(FO_B) collapses to FO with order. In contrast, our results imply that if B contains the order and the range of a polynomial of degree at least two, then R-cl(FO_B) includes all languages in DLOGTIME-uniform TC^0. △ Less

Submitted 13 September, 2023; originally announced September 2023.

Quantifiers closed under partial polymorphisms

Authors: Anuj Dawar, Lauri Hella

Abstract: We study Lindstrom quantifiers that satisfy certain closure properties which are motivated by the study of polymorphisms in the context of constraint satisfaction problems (CSP). When the algebra of polymorphisms of a finite structure B satisfies certain equations, this gives rise to a natural closure condition on the class of structures that map homomorphically to B. The collection of quantifiers… ▽ More We study Lindstrom quantifiers that satisfy certain closure properties which are motivated by the study of polymorphisms in the context of constraint satisfaction problems (CSP). When the algebra of polymorphisms of a finite structure B satisfies certain equations, this gives rise to a natural closure condition on the class of structures that map homomorphically to B. The collection of quantifiers that satisfy closure conditions arising from a fixed set of equations are rather more general than those arising as CSP. For any such conditions P, we define a pebble game that delimits the distinguishing power of the infinitary logic with all quantifiers that are P-closed. We use the pebble game to show that the problem of deciding whether a system of linear equations is solvable in Z2 is not expressible in the infinitary logic with all quantifiers closed under a near-unanimity condition. △ Less

Submitted 7 August, 2023; originally announced August 2023.

Comments: Submitted. 17 pages

Descriptive complexity for distributed computing with circuits

Authors: Veeti Ahvonen, Damian Heiman, Lauri Hella, Antti Kuusisto

Abstract: We consider distributed algorithms in the realistic scenario where distributed message passing is operated via circuits. We show that within this setting, modal substitution calculus MSC captures the expressive power of circuits. The translations between circuits and MSC-programs are linear in both directions. Furthermore, we show that the colouring algorithm based on Cole-Vishkin can be specified… ▽ More We consider distributed algorithms in the realistic scenario where distributed message passing is operated via circuits. We show that within this setting, modal substitution calculus MSC captures the expressive power of circuits. The translations between circuits and MSC-programs are linear in both directions. Furthermore, we show that the colouring algorithm based on Cole-Vishkin can be specified via logarithmic size programs. △ Less

Submitted 8 March, 2023; originally announced March 2023.

ACM Class: F.4.1; F.1.1; C.2.0

Defining long words succinctly in FO and MSO

Authors: Lauri Hella, Miikka Vilander

Abstract: We consider the length of the longest word definable in FO and MSO via a formula of size n. For both logics we obtain as an upper bound for this number an exponential tower of height linear in n. We prove this by counting types with respect to a fixed quantifier rank. As lower bounds we obtain for both FO and MSO an exponential tower of height in the order of a rational power of n. We show these l… ▽ More We consider the length of the longest word definable in FO and MSO via a formula of size n. For both logics we obtain as an upper bound for this number an exponential tower of height linear in n. We prove this by counting types with respect to a fixed quantifier rank. As lower bounds we obtain for both FO and MSO an exponential tower of height in the order of a rational power of n. We show these lower bounds by giving concrete formulas defining word representations of levels of the cumulative hierarchy of sets. In addition, we consider the Löwenheim-Skolem and Hanf numbers of these logics on words and obtain similar bounds for these as well. △ Less

Submitted 21 February, 2022; originally announced February 2022.

Comments: Submitted to Computability in Europe 2022

ACM Class: F.4.1

A Completeness Proof for A Regular Predicate Logic with Undefined Truth Value

Authors: Antti Valmari, Lauri Hella

Abstract: We provide a sound and complete proof system for an extension of Kleene's ternary logic to predicates. The concept of theory is extended with, for each function symbol, a formula that specifies when the function is defined. The notion of "is defined" is extended to terms and formulas via a straightforward recursive algorithm. The "is defined" formulas are constructed so that they themselves are al… ▽ More We provide a sound and complete proof system for an extension of Kleene's ternary logic to predicates. The concept of theory is extended with, for each function symbol, a formula that specifies when the function is defined. The notion of "is defined" is extended to terms and formulas via a straightforward recursive algorithm. The "is defined" formulas are constructed so that they themselves are always defined. The completeness proof relies on the Henkin construction. For each formula, precisely one of the formula, its negation, and the negation of its "is defined" formula is true on the constructed model. Many other ternary logics in the literature can be reduced to ours. Partial functions are ubiquitous in computer science and even in (in)equation solving at schools. Our work was motivated by an attempt to explain, precisely in terms of logic, typical informal methods of reasoning in such applications. △ Less

Submitted 26 March, 2023; v1 submitted 8 December, 2021; originally announced December 2021.

Comments: 39 pages, 1 figure

MSC Class: 03B50; 03F03 (Primary) 03B10 (Secondary)

Journal ref: Notre Dame J. Formal Logic 64(1): 61--93 (February 2023)

Bounded Game-Theoretic Semantics for Modal Mu-Calculus and Some Variants

Authors: Lauri Hella, Antti Kuusisto, Raine Rönnholm

Abstract: We introduce a new game-theoretic semantics (GTS) for the modal mu-calculus. Our so-called bounded GTS replaces parity games with alternative evaluation games where only finite paths arise; infinite paths are not needed even when the considered transition system is infinite. The novel games offer alternative approaches to various constructions in the framework of the mu-calculus. For example, they… ▽ More We introduce a new game-theoretic semantics (GTS) for the modal mu-calculus. Our so-called bounded GTS replaces parity games with alternative evaluation games where only finite paths arise; infinite paths are not needed even when the considered transition system is infinite. The novel games offer alternative approaches to various constructions in the framework of the mu-calculus. For example, they have already been successfully used as a basis for an approach leading to a natural formula size game for the logic. While our main focus is introducing the new GTS, we also consider some applications to demonstrate its uses. For example, we consider a natural model transformation procedure that reduces model checking games to checking a single, fixed formula in the constructed models, and we also use the GTS to identify new alternative variants of the mu-calculus with PTime model checking. △ Less

Submitted 22 September, 2020; originally announced September 2020.

Comments: In Proceedings GandALF 2020, arXiv:2009.09360. The official conference version of the extended preprint arXiv:1706.00753

ACM Class: F.4.1

Journal ref: EPTCS 326, 2020, pp. 82-96

Formula size games for modal logic and $μ$-calculus

Authors: Lauri Hella, Miikka Vilander

Abstract: We propose a new version of formula size game for modal logic. The game characterizes the equivalence of pointed Kripke-models up to formulas of given numbers of modal operators and binary connectives. Our game is similar to the well-known Adler-Immerman game. However, due to a crucial difference in the definition of positions of the game, its winning condition is simpler, and the second player do… ▽ More We propose a new version of formula size game for modal logic. The game characterizes the equivalence of pointed Kripke-models up to formulas of given numbers of modal operators and binary connectives. Our game is similar to the well-known Adler-Immerman game. However, due to a crucial difference in the definition of positions of the game, its winning condition is simpler, and the second player does not have a trivial optimal strategy. Thus, unlike the Adler-Immerman game, our game is a genuine two-person game. We illustrate the use of the game by proving a non-elementary succinctness gap between bisimulation invariant first-order logic $\mathrm{FO}$ and (basic) modal logic $\mathrm{ML}$. We also present a version of the game for the modal $μ$-calculus $\mathrm{L}_μ$ and show that $\mathrm{FO}$ is also non-elementarily more succinct than $\mathrm{L}_μ$. △ Less

Submitted 17 December, 2019; originally announced December 2019.

Comments: This is a preprint of an article published in Journal of Logic and Computation Published by Oxford University Press. arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:1604.07225

Journal ref: Journal of Logic and Computation, exz025, Oxford University Press, 2019

Complexity Thresholds in Inclusion Logic

Authors: Miika Hannula, Lauri Hella

Abstract: Logics with team semantics provide alternative means for logical characterization of complexity classes. Both dependence and independence logic are known to capture non-deterministic polynomial time, and the frontiers of tractability in these logics are relatively well understood. Inclusion logic is similar to these team-based logical formalisms with the exception that it corresponds to determinis… ▽ More Logics with team semantics provide alternative means for logical characterization of complexity classes. Both dependence and independence logic are known to capture non-deterministic polynomial time, and the frontiers of tractability in these logics are relatively well understood. Inclusion logic is similar to these team-based logical formalisms with the exception that it corresponds to deterministic polynomial time in ordered models. In this article we examine connections between syntactical fragments of inclusion logic and different complexity classes in terms of two computational problems: maximal subteam membership and the model checking problem for a fixed inclusion logic formula. We show that very simple quantifier-free formulae with one or two inclusion atoms generate instances of these problems that are complete for (non-deterministic) logarithmic space and polynomial time. Furthermore, we present a fragment of inclusion logic that captures non-deterministic logarithmic space in ordered models. △ Less

Submitted 26 March, 2019; originally announced March 2019.

ACM Class: F.4.1

Bounded game-theoretic semantics for modal mu-calculus

Authors: Lauri Hella, Antti Kuusisto, Raine Rönnholm

Abstract: We introduce a new game-theoretic semantics (GTS) for the modal mu-calculus. Our so-called bounded GTS replaces parity games with alternative evaluation games where only finite paths arise; infinite paths are not needed even when the considered transition system is infinite. The novel games offer alternative approaches to various constructions in the framework of the mu-calculus. For example, they… ▽ More We introduce a new game-theoretic semantics (GTS) for the modal mu-calculus. Our so-called bounded GTS replaces parity games with alternative evaluation games where only finite paths arise; infinite paths are not needed even when the considered transition system is infinite. The novel games offer alternative approaches to various constructions in the framework of the mu-calculus. For example, they have already been successfully used as a basis for an approach leading to a natural formula size game for the logic. While our main focus is introducing the new GTS, we also consider some applications to demonstrate its uses. For example, we consider a natural model transformation procedure that reduces model checking games to checking a single, fixed formula in the constructed models, and we also use the GTS to identify new alternative variants of the mu-calculus with PTime model checking. △ Less

Submitted 21 May, 2020; v1 submitted 2 June, 2017; originally announced June 2017.

Comments: Significantly extented version

MSC Class: 03-XX ACM Class: F.4.1

Model Checking and Validity in Propositional and Modal Inclusion Logics

Authors: Lauri Hella, Antti Kuusisto, Arne Meier, Jonni Virtema

Abstract: Propositional and modal inclusion logic are formalisms that belong to the family of logics based on team semantics. This article investigates the model checking and validity problems of these logics. We identify complexity bounds for both problems, covering both lax and strict team semantics. By doing so, we come close to finalising the programme that ultimately aims to classify the complexities o… ▽ More Propositional and modal inclusion logic are formalisms that belong to the family of logics based on team semantics. This article investigates the model checking and validity problems of these logics. We identify complexity bounds for both problems, covering both lax and strict team semantics. By doing so, we come close to finalising the programme that ultimately aims to classify the complexities of the central reasoning problems for modal and propositional dependence, independence, and inclusion logics. △ Less

Submitted 24 April, 2017; v1 submitted 22 September, 2016; originally announced September 2016.

The Succinctness of First-order Logic over Modal Logic via a Formula Size Game

Authors: Lauri Hella, Miikka Vilander

Abstract: We propose a new version of formula size game for modal logic. The game characterizes the equivalence of pointed Kripke-models up to formulas of given numbers of modal operators and binary connectives. Our game is similar to the well-known Adler-Immerman game. However, due to a crucial difference in the definition of positions of the game, its winning condition is simpler, and the second player (d… ▽ More We propose a new version of formula size game for modal logic. The game characterizes the equivalence of pointed Kripke-models up to formulas of given numbers of modal operators and binary connectives. Our game is similar to the well-known Adler-Immerman game. However, due to a crucial difference in the definition of positions of the game, its winning condition is simpler, and the second player (duplicator) does not have a trivial optimal strategy. Thus, unlike the Adler-Immerman game, our game is a genuine two-person game. We illustrate the use of the game by proving a nonelementary succinctness gap between bisimulation invariant first-order logic FO and (basic) modal logic ML. △ Less

Submitted 25 April, 2016; originally announced April 2016.

MSC Class: 03B45

The expressive power of modal logic with inclusion atoms

Authors: Lauri Hella, Johanna Stumpf

Abstract: Modal inclusion logic is the extension of basic modal logic with inclusion atoms, and its semantics is defined on Kripke models with teams. A team of a Kripke model is just a subset of its domain. In this paper we give a complete characterisation for the expressive power of modal inclusion logic: a class of Kripke models with teams is definable in modal inclusion logic if and only if it is closed… ▽ More Modal inclusion logic is the extension of basic modal logic with inclusion atoms, and its semantics is defined on Kripke models with teams. A team of a Kripke model is just a subset of its domain. In this paper we give a complete characterisation for the expressive power of modal inclusion logic: a class of Kripke models with teams is definable in modal inclusion logic if and only if it is closed under k-bisimulation for some integer k, it is closed under unions, and it has the empty team property. We also prove that the same expressive power can be obtained by adding a single unary nonemptiness operator to modal logic. Furthermore, we establish an exponential lower bound for the size of the translation from modal inclusion logic to modal logic with the nonemptiness operator. △ Less

Submitted 23 September, 2015; originally announced September 2015.

Comments: In Proceedings GandALF 2015, arXiv:1509.06858

Journal ref: EPTCS 193, 2015, pp. 129-143

Satisfiability of Modal Inclusion Logic: Lax and Strict Semantics

Authors: Lauri Hella, Antti Kuusisto, Arne Meier, Heribert Vollmer

Abstract: We investigate the computational complexity of the satisfiability problem of modal inclusion logic. We distinguish two variants of the problem: one for the strict and another one for the lax semantics. Both problems turn out to be EXPTIME-complete on general structures. Finally, we show how for a specific class of structures NEXPTIME-completeness for these problems under strict semantics can be ac… ▽ More We investigate the computational complexity of the satisfiability problem of modal inclusion logic. We distinguish two variants of the problem: one for the strict and another one for the lax semantics. Both problems turn out to be EXPTIME-complete on general structures. Finally, we show how for a specific class of structures NEXPTIME-completeness for these problems under strict semantics can be achieved. △ Less

Submitted 14 October, 2017; v1 submitted 24 April, 2015; originally announced April 2015.

Comments: Correction of MFCS 2015 paper

Boolean Dependence Logic and Partially-Ordered Connectives

Authors: Johannes Ebbing, Lauri Hella, Peter Lohmann, Jonni Virtema

Abstract: We introduce a new variant of dependence logic called Boolean dependence logic. In Boolean dependence logic dependence atoms are of the type =(x_1,...,x_n,α), where αis a Boolean variable. Intuitively, with Boolean dependence atoms one can express quantification of relations, while standard dependence atoms express quantification over functions. We compare the expressive power of Boolean depende… ▽ More We introduce a new variant of dependence logic called Boolean dependence logic. In Boolean dependence logic dependence atoms are of the type =(x_1,...,x_n,α), where αis a Boolean variable. Intuitively, with Boolean dependence atoms one can express quantification of relations, while standard dependence atoms express quantification over functions. We compare the expressive power of Boolean dependence logic to dependence logic and first-order logic enriched by partially-ordered connectives. We show that the expressive power of Boolean dependence logic and dependence logic coincide. We define natural syntactic fragments of Boolean dependence logic and show that they coincide with the corresponding fragments of first-order logic enriched by partially-ordered connectives with respect to expressive power. We then show that the fragments form a strict hierarchy. △ Less

Submitted 27 June, 2014; originally announced June 2014.

Comments: 41 pages

The Expressive Power of Modal Dependence Logic

Authors: Lauri Hella, Kerkko Luosto, Katsuhiko Sano, Jonni Virtema

Abstract: We study the expressive power of various modal logics with team semantics. We show that exactly the properties of teams that are downward closed and closed under team k-bisimulation, for some finite k, are definable in modal logic extended with intuitionistic disjunction. Furthermore, we show that the expressive power of modal logic with intuitionistic disjunction and extended modal dependence log… ▽ More We study the expressive power of various modal logics with team semantics. We show that exactly the properties of teams that are downward closed and closed under team k-bisimulation, for some finite k, are definable in modal logic extended with intuitionistic disjunction. Furthermore, we show that the expressive power of modal logic with intuitionistic disjunction and extended modal dependence logic coincide. Finally we establish that any translation from extended modal dependence logic into modal logic with intuitionistic disjunction increases the size of some formulas exponentially. △ Less

Submitted 24 June, 2014; originally announced June 2014.

Comments: 19 pages

One-dimensional fragment of first-order logic

Authors: Lauri Hella, Antti Kuusisto

Abstract: We introduce a novel decidable fragment of first-order logic. The fragment is one-dimensional in the sense that quantification is limited to applications of blocks of existential (universal) quantifiers such that at most one variable remains free in the quantified formula. The fragment is closed under Boolean operations, but additional restrictions (called uniformity conditions) apply to combinati… ▽ More We introduce a novel decidable fragment of first-order logic. The fragment is one-dimensional in the sense that quantification is limited to applications of blocks of existential (universal) quantifiers such that at most one variable remains free in the quantified formula. The fragment is closed under Boolean operations, but additional restrictions (called uniformity conditions) apply to combinations of atomic formulae with two or more variables. We argue that the notions of one-dimensionality and uniformity together offer a novel perspective on the robust decidability of modal logics. We also establish that minor modifications to the restrictions of the syntax of the one-dimensional fragment lead to undecidable formalisms. Namely, the two-dimensional and non-uniform one-dimensional fragments are shown undecidable. Finally, we prove that with regard to expressivity, the one-dimensional fragment is incomparable with both the guarded negation fragment and two-variable logic with counting. Our proof of the decidability of the one-dimensional fragment is based on a technique involving a direct reduction to the monadic class of first-order logic. The novel technique is itself of an independent mathematical interest. △ Less

Submitted 15 April, 2014; originally announced April 2014.

Inclusion Logic and Fixed Point Logic

Authors: Pietro Galliani, Lauri Hella

Abstract: We investigate the properties of Inclusion Logic, that is, First Order Logic with Team Semantics extended with inclusion dependencies. We prove that Inclusion Logic is equivalent to Greatest Fixed Point Logic, and we prove that all union-closed first-order definable properties of relations are definable in it. We also provide an Ehrenfeucht-Fraïssé game for Inclusion Logic, and give an example ill… ▽ More We investigate the properties of Inclusion Logic, that is, First Order Logic with Team Semantics extended with inclusion dependencies. We prove that Inclusion Logic is equivalent to Greatest Fixed Point Logic, and we prove that all union-closed first-order definable properties of relations are definable in it. We also provide an Ehrenfeucht-Fraïssé game for Inclusion Logic, and give an example illustrating its use. △ Less

Submitted 30 April, 2013; v1 submitted 15 April, 2013; originally announced April 2013.

ACM Class: F.4.1

The size of a formula as a measure of complexity

Authors: Lauri Hella, Jouko Väänänen

Abstract: We introduce a refinement of the usual Ehrenfeucht-Fraïssé game. The new game will help us make finer distinctions than the traditional one. In particular, it can be used to measure the size formulas needed for expressing a given property. We will give two versions of the game: the first version characterizes the size of formulas in propositional logic, and the second version works for first-order… ▽ More We introduce a refinement of the usual Ehrenfeucht-Fraïssé game. The new game will help us make finer distinctions than the traditional one. In particular, it can be used to measure the size formulas needed for expressing a given property. We will give two versions of the game: the first version characterizes the size of formulas in propositional logic, and the second version works for first-order predicate logic. △ Less

Submitted 23 August, 2012; originally announced August 2012.

Comments: 25 pages

MSC Class: 03C07

Weak Models of Distributed Computing, with Connections to Modal Logic

Authors: Lauri Hella, Matti Järvisalo, Antti Kuusisto, Juhana Laurinharju, Tuomo Lempiäinen, Kerkko Luosto, Jukka Suomela, Jonni Virtema

Abstract: This work presents a classification of weak models of distributed computing. We focus on deterministic distributed algorithms, and study models of computing that are weaker versions of the widely-studied port-numbering model. In the port-numbering model, a node of degree d receives messages through d input ports and sends messages through d output ports, both numbered with 1,2,...,d. In this work,… ▽ More This work presents a classification of weak models of distributed computing. We focus on deterministic distributed algorithms, and study models of computing that are weaker versions of the widely-studied port-numbering model. In the port-numbering model, a node of degree d receives messages through d input ports and sends messages through d output ports, both numbered with 1,2,...,d. In this work, VVc is the class of all graph problems that can be solved in the standard port-numbering model. We study the following subclasses of VVc: VV: Input port i and output port i are not necessarily connected to the same neighbour. MV: Input ports are not numbered; algorithms receive a multiset of messages. SV: Input ports are not numbered; algorithms receive a set of messages. VB: Output ports are not numbered; algorithms send the same message to all output ports. MB: Combination of MV and VB. SB: Combination of SV and VB. Now we have many trivial containment relations, such as SB \subseteq MB \subseteq VB \subseteq VV \subseteq VVc, but it is not obvious if, for example, either of VB \subseteq SV or SV \subseteq VB should hold. Nevertheless, it turns out that we can identify a linear order on these classes. We prove that SB \subsetneq MB = VB \subsetneq SV = MV = VV \subsetneq VVc. The same holds for the constant-time versions of these classes. We also show that the constant-time variants of these classes can be characterised by a corresponding modal logic. Hence the linear order identified in this work has direct implications in the study of the expressibility of modal logic. Conversely, one can use tools from modal logic to study these classes. △ Less

Submitted 21 December, 2013; v1 submitted 9 May, 2012; originally announced May 2012.

Comments: 1 + 40 pages, 9 figures