The doctor will polygraph you now: ethical concerns with AI for fact-checking patients
Authors:
James Anibal,
Jasmine Gunkel,
Shaheen Awan,
Hannah Huth,
Hang Nguyen,
Tram Le,
Jean-Christophe Bélisle-Pipon,
Micah Boyer,
Lindsey Hazen,
Bridge2AI Voice Consortium,
Yael Bensoussan,
David Clifton,
Bradford Wood
Abstract:
Artificial intelligence (AI) methods have been proposed for the prediction of social behaviors which could be reasonably understood from patient-reported information. This raises novel ethical concerns about respect, privacy, and control over patient data. Ethical concerns surrounding clinical AI systems for social behavior verification can be divided into two main categories: (1) the potential fo…
▽ More
Artificial intelligence (AI) methods have been proposed for the prediction of social behaviors which could be reasonably understood from patient-reported information. This raises novel ethical concerns about respect, privacy, and control over patient data. Ethical concerns surrounding clinical AI systems for social behavior verification can be divided into two main categories: (1) the potential for inaccuracies/biases within such systems, and (2) the impact on trust in patient-provider relationships with the introduction of automated AI systems for fact-checking, particularly in cases where the data/models may contradict the patient. Additionally, this report simulated the misuse of a verification system using patient voice samples and identified a potential LLM bias against patient-reported information in favor of multi-dimensional data and the outputs of other AI methods (i.e., AI self-trust). Finally, recommendations were presented for mitigating the risk that AI verification methods will cause harm to patients or undermine the purpose of the healthcare system.
△ Less
Submitted 11 November, 2024; v1 submitted 14 August, 2024;
originally announced August 2024.
Voice EHR: Introducing Multimodal Audio Data for Health
Authors:
James Anibal,
Hannah Huth,
Ming Li,
Lindsey Hazen,
Veronica Daoud,
Dominique Ebedes,
Yen Minh Lam,
Hang Nguyen,
Phuc Hong,
Michael Kleinman,
Shelley Ost,
Christopher Jackson,
Laura Sprabery,
Cheran Elangovan,
Balaji Krishnaiah,
Lee Akst,
Ioan Lina,
Iqbal Elyazar,
Lenny Ekwati,
Stefan Jansen,
Richard Nduwayezu,
Charisse Garcia,
Jeffrey Plum,
Jacqueline Brenner,
Miranda Song
, et al. (5 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Artificial intelligence (AI) models trained on audio data may have the potential to rapidly perform clinical tasks, enhancing medical decision-making and potentially improving outcomes through early detection. Existing technologies depend on limited datasets collected with expensive recording equipment in high-income countries, which challenges deployment in resource-constrained, high-volume setti…
▽ More
Artificial intelligence (AI) models trained on audio data may have the potential to rapidly perform clinical tasks, enhancing medical decision-making and potentially improving outcomes through early detection. Existing technologies depend on limited datasets collected with expensive recording equipment in high-income countries, which challenges deployment in resource-constrained, high-volume settings where audio data may have a profound impact on health equity. This report introduces a novel data type and a corresponding collection system that captures health data through guided questions using only a mobile/web application. The app facilitates the collection of an audio electronic health record (Voice EHR) which may contain complex biomarkers of health from conventional voice/respiratory features, speech patterns, and spoken language with semantic meaning and longitudinal context, potentially compensating for the typical limitations of unimodal clinical datasets. This report presents the application used for data collection, initial experiments on data quality, and case studies which demonstrate the potential of voice EHR to advance the scalability/diversity of audio AI.
△ Less
Submitted 9 November, 2024; v1 submitted 2 April, 2024;
originally announced April 2024.