-
Energy mean-payoff games
Authors:
Véronique Bruyère,
Quentin Hautem,
Mickael Randour,
Jean-François Raskin
Abstract:
In this paper, we study one-player and two-player energy mean-payoff games. Energy mean-payoff games are games of infinite duration played on a finite graph with edges labeled by 2-dimensional weight vectors. The objective of the first player (the protagonist) is to satisfy an energy objective on the first dimension and a mean-payoff objective on the second dimension. We show that optimal strategi…
▽ More
In this paper, we study one-player and two-player energy mean-payoff games. Energy mean-payoff games are games of infinite duration played on a finite graph with edges labeled by 2-dimensional weight vectors. The objective of the first player (the protagonist) is to satisfy an energy objective on the first dimension and a mean-payoff objective on the second dimension. We show that optimal strategies for the first player may require infinite memory while optimal strategies for the second player (the antagonist) do not require memory. In the one-player case (where only the first player has choices), the problem of deciding who is the winner can be solved in polynomial time while for the two-player case we show co-NP membership and we give effective constructions for the infinite-memory optimal strategies of the protagonist.
△ Less
Submitted 2 July, 2019;
originally announced July 2019.
-
Parameterized complexity of games with monotonically ordered ω-regular objectives
Authors:
Véronique Bruyère,
Quentin Hautem,
Jean-François Raskin
Abstract:
In recent years, two-player zero-sum games with multiple objectives have received a lot of interest as a model for the synthesis of complex reactive systems. In this framework, Player 1 wins if he can ensure that all objectives are satisfied against any behavior of Player 2. When this is not possible to satisfy all the objectives at once, an alternative is to use some preorder on the objectives ac…
▽ More
In recent years, two-player zero-sum games with multiple objectives have received a lot of interest as a model for the synthesis of complex reactive systems. In this framework, Player 1 wins if he can ensure that all objectives are satisfied against any behavior of Player 2. When this is not possible to satisfy all the objectives at once, an alternative is to use some preorder on the objectives according to which subset of objectives Player 1 wants to satisfy. For example, it is often natural to provide more significance to one objective over another, a situation that can be modelled with lexicographically ordered objectives for instance. Inspired by recent work on concurrent games with multiple ω-regular objectives by Bouyer et al., we investigate in detail turned-based games with monotonically ordered and ω-regular objectives. We study the threshold problem which asks whether player 1 can ensure a payoff greater than or equal to a given threshold w.r.t. a given monotonic preorder. As the number of objectives is usually much smaller than the size of the game graph, we provide a parametric complexity analysis and we show that our threshold problem is in FPT for all monotonic preorders and all classical types of ω-regular objectives. We also provide polynomial time algorithms for Büchi, coBüchi and explicit Muller objectives for a large subclass of monotonic preorders that includes among others the lexicographic preorder. In the particular case of lexicographic preorder, we also study the complexity of computing the values and the memory requirements of optimal strategies.
△ Less
Submitted 2 July, 2018; v1 submitted 19 July, 2017;
originally announced July 2017.
-
Window Parity Games: An Alternative Approach Toward Parity Games with Time Bounds (Full Version)
Authors:
Véronique Bruyère,
Quentin Hautem,
Mickael Randour
Abstract:
Classical objectives in two-player zero-sum games played on graphs often deal with limit behaviors of infinite plays: e.g., mean-payoff and total-payoff in the quantitative setting, or parity in the qualitative one (a canonical way to encode omega-regular properties). Those objectives offer powerful abstraction mechanisms and often yield nice properties such as memoryless determinacy. However, the…
▽ More
Classical objectives in two-player zero-sum games played on graphs often deal with limit behaviors of infinite plays: e.g., mean-payoff and total-payoff in the quantitative setting, or parity in the qualitative one (a canonical way to encode omega-regular properties). Those objectives offer powerful abstraction mechanisms and often yield nice properties such as memoryless determinacy. However, their very nature provides no guarantee on time bounds within which something good can be witnessed. In this work, we consider two approaches toward inclusion of time bounds in parity games. The first one, parity-response games, is based on the notion of finitary parity games [CHH09] and parity games with costs [FZ14,WZ16]. The second one, window parity games, is inspired by window mean-payoff games [CDRR15]. We compare the two approaches and show that while they prove to be equivalent in some contexts, window parity games offer a more tractable alternative when the time bound is given as a parameter (P-c. vs. PSPACE-C.). In particular, it provides a conservative approximation of parity games computable in polynomial time. Furthermore, we extend both approaches to the multi-dimension setting. We give the full picture for both types of games with regard to complexity and memory bounds.
[CHH09] K. Chatterjee, T.A. Henzinger, F. Horn (2009): Finitary winning in omega-regular games. ACM Trans. Comput. Log. 11(1). [FZ14] N. Fijalkow, M. Zimmermann (2014): Parity and Streett Games with Costs. LMCS 10(2). [WZ16] A. Weinert, M. Zimmermann (2016): Easy to Win, Hard to Master: Optimal Strategies in Parity Games with Costs. Proc. of CSL, LIPIcs 62, pp. 31:1-31:17, Schloss Dagstuhl - LZI. [CDRR15] K. Chatterjee, L. Doyen, M. Randour, J.-F. Raskin (2015): Looking at mean-payoff and total-payoff through windows. Information and Computation 242, pp. 25-52.
△ Less
Submitted 15 September, 2016;
originally announced September 2016.
-
Window Parity Games: An Alternative Approach Toward Parity Games with Time Bounds
Authors:
Véronique Bruyère,
Quentin Hautem,
Mickael Randour
Abstract:
Classical objectives in two-player zero-sum games played on graphs often deal with limit behaviors of infinite plays: e.g., mean-payoff and total-payoff in the quantitative setting, or parity in the qualitative one (a canonical way to encode omega-regular properties). Those objectives offer powerful abstraction mechanisms and often yield nice properties such as memoryless determinacy. However, the…
▽ More
Classical objectives in two-player zero-sum games played on graphs often deal with limit behaviors of infinite plays: e.g., mean-payoff and total-payoff in the quantitative setting, or parity in the qualitative one (a canonical way to encode omega-regular properties). Those objectives offer powerful abstraction mechanisms and often yield nice properties such as memoryless determinacy. However, their very nature provides no guarantee on time bounds within which something good can be witnessed. In this work, we consider two approaches toward inclusion of time bounds in parity games. The first one, parity-response games, is based on the notion of finitary parity games [CHH09] and parity games with costs [FZ14,WZ16]. The second one, window parity games, is inspired by window mean-payoff games [CDRR15]. We compare the two approaches and show that while they prove to be equivalent in some contexts, window parity games offer a more tractable alternative when the time bound is given as a parameter (P-c. vs. PSPACE-c.). In particular, it provides a conservative approximation of parity games computable in polynomial time. Furthermore, we extend both approaches to the multi-dimension setting. We give the full picture for both types of games with regard to complexity and memory bounds.
[CHH09] K. Chatterjee, T.A. Henzinger, F. Horn (2009): Finitary winning in omega-regular games. ACM Trans. Comput. Log. 11(1). [FZ14] N. Fijalkow, M. Zimmermann (2014): Parity and Streett Games with Costs. LMCS 10(2). [WZ16] A. Weinert, M. Zimmermann (2016): Easy to Win, Hard to Master: Optimal Strategies in Parity Games with Costs. Proc. of CSL, LIPIcs, Schloss Dagstuhl - LZI. To appear. [CDRR15] K. Chatterjee, L. Doyen, M. Randour, J.-F. Raskin (2015): Looking at mean-payoff and total-payoff through windows. Information and Computation 242, pp. 25-52.
△ Less
Submitted 13 September, 2016; v1 submitted 6 June, 2016;
originally announced June 2016.
-
On the complexity of heterogeneous multidimensional quantitative games
Authors:
Véronique Bruyère,
Quentin Hautem,
Jean-François Raskin
Abstract:
In this paper, we study two-player zero-sum turn-based games played on a finite multidimensional weighted graph. In recent papers all dimensions use the same measure, whereas here we allow to combine different measures. Such heterogeneous multidimensional quantitative games provide a general and natural model for the study of reactive system synthesis. We focus on classical measures like the Inf,…
▽ More
In this paper, we study two-player zero-sum turn-based games played on a finite multidimensional weighted graph. In recent papers all dimensions use the same measure, whereas here we allow to combine different measures. Such heterogeneous multidimensional quantitative games provide a general and natural model for the study of reactive system synthesis. We focus on classical measures like the Inf, Sup, LimInf, and LimSup of the weights seen along the play, as well as on the window mean-payoff (WMP) measure. This new measure is a natural strengthening of the mean-payoff measure. We allow objectives defined as Boolean combinations of heterogeneous constraints. While multidimensional games with Boolean combinations of mean-payoff constraints are undecidable, we show that the problem becomes EXPTIME-complete for DNF/CNF Boolean combinations of heterogeneous measures taken among {WMP, Inf, Sup, LimInf, LimSup} and that exponential memory strategies are sufficient for both players to win. We provide a detailed study of the complexity and the memory requirements when the Boolean combination of the measures is replaced by an intersection. EXPTIME-completeness and exponential memory strategies still hold for the intersection of measures in {WMP, Inf, Sup, LimInf, LimSup}, and we get PSPACE-completeness when WMP measure is no longer considered. To avoid EXPTIME-or PSPACE-hardness, we impose at most one occurrence of WMP measure and fix the number of Sup measures, and we propose several refinements (on the number of occurrences of the other measures) for which we get polynomial algorithms and lower memory requirements. For all the considered classes of games, we also study parameterized complexity.
△ Less
Submitted 21 June, 2016; v1 submitted 26 November, 2015;
originally announced November 2015.
