-
Cognitive Silicon: An Architectural Blueprint for Post-Industrial Computing Systems
Authors:
Christoforus Yoga Haryanto,
Emily Lomempow
Abstract:
Autonomous AI systems reveal foundational limitations in deterministic, human-authored computing architectures. This paper presents Cognitive Silicon: a hypothetical full-stack architectural framework projected toward 2035, exploring a possible trajectory for cognitive computing system design. The proposed architecture would integrate symbolic scaffolding, governed memory, runtime moral coherence,…
▽ More
Autonomous AI systems reveal foundational limitations in deterministic, human-authored computing architectures. This paper presents Cognitive Silicon: a hypothetical full-stack architectural framework projected toward 2035, exploring a possible trajectory for cognitive computing system design. The proposed architecture would integrate symbolic scaffolding, governed memory, runtime moral coherence, and alignment-aware execution across silicon-to-semantics layers. Our design grammar has emerged from dialectical co-design with LLMs under asymmetric epistemic conditions--creating structured friction to expose blind spots and trade-offs. The envisioned framework would establish mortality as a natural consequence of physical constraints, non-copyable tacit knowledge, and non-cloneable identity keys as cognitive-embodiment primitives. Core tensions (trust/agency, scaffolding/emergence, execution/governance) would function as central architectural pressures rather than edge cases. The architecture theoretically converges with the Free Energy Principle, potentially offering a formal account of how cognitive systems could maintain identity through prediction error minimization across physical and computational boundaries. The resulting framework aims to deliver a morally tractable cognitive infrastructure that could maintain human-alignment through irreversible hardware constraints and identity-bound epistemic mechanisms resistant to replication or subversion.
△ Less
Submitted 23 April, 2025;
originally announced April 2025.
-
Contextualized AI for Cyber Defense: An Automated Survey using LLMs
Authors:
Christoforus Yoga Haryanto,
Anne Maria Elvira,
Trung Duc Nguyen,
Minh Hieu Vu,
Yoshiano Hartanto,
Emily Lomempow,
Arathi Arakala
Abstract:
This paper surveys the potential of contextualized AI in enhancing cyber defense capabilities, revealing significant research growth from 2015 to 2024. We identify a focus on robustness, reliability, and integration methods, while noting gaps in organizational trust and governance frameworks. Our study employs two LLM-assisted literature survey methodologies: (A) ChatGPT 4 for exploration, and (B)…
▽ More
This paper surveys the potential of contextualized AI in enhancing cyber defense capabilities, revealing significant research growth from 2015 to 2024. We identify a focus on robustness, reliability, and integration methods, while noting gaps in organizational trust and governance frameworks. Our study employs two LLM-assisted literature survey methodologies: (A) ChatGPT 4 for exploration, and (B) Gemma 2:9b for filtering with Claude 3.5 Sonnet for full-text analysis. We discuss the effectiveness and challenges of using LLMs in academic research, providing insights for future researchers.
△ Less
Submitted 20 September, 2024;
originally announced September 2024.
-
Progress: A Post-AI Manifesto
Authors:
Christoforus Yoga Haryanto
Abstract:
This manifesto outlines key principles for progress in the post-AI era, emphasizing non-linear yet cumulative advancement, deep understanding of purpose and context, multi-stakeholder collaboration, and system-level experimentation. It redefines progress as substantial, durable, and replicable advancement, highlighting the importance of balancing technological innovation with human-centric values.…
▽ More
This manifesto outlines key principles for progress in the post-AI era, emphasizing non-linear yet cumulative advancement, deep understanding of purpose and context, multi-stakeholder collaboration, and system-level experimentation. It redefines progress as substantial, durable, and replicable advancement, highlighting the importance of balancing technological innovation with human-centric values. It acknowledges AI's potential to accelerate progress across industries while recognizing its limitations, such as creating illusions of understanding and potentially narrowing problem-solving approaches. It concludes that true progress in the AI age requires a symbiosis of artificial intelligence capabilities and human ingenuity, calling for a holistic, interdisciplinary approach to shape a future that serves all of humanity.
△ Less
Submitted 25 August, 2024;
originally announced August 2024.
-
LLAssist: Simple Tools for Automating Literature Review Using Large Language Models
Authors:
Christoforus Yoga Haryanto
Abstract:
This paper introduces LLAssist, an open-source tool designed to streamline literature reviews in academic research. In an era of exponential growth in scientific publications, researchers face mounting challenges in efficiently processing vast volumes of literature. LLAssist addresses this issue by leveraging Large Language Models (LLMs) and Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques to automate…
▽ More
This paper introduces LLAssist, an open-source tool designed to streamline literature reviews in academic research. In an era of exponential growth in scientific publications, researchers face mounting challenges in efficiently processing vast volumes of literature. LLAssist addresses this issue by leveraging Large Language Models (LLMs) and Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques to automate key aspects of the review process. Specifically, it extracts important information from research articles and evaluates their relevance to user-defined research questions. The goal of LLAssist is to significantly reduce the time and effort required for comprehensive literature reviews, allowing researchers to focus more on analyzing and synthesizing information rather than on initial screening tasks. By automating parts of the literature review workflow, LLAssist aims to help researchers manage the growing volume of academic publications more efficiently.
△ Less
Submitted 20 December, 2024; v1 submitted 18 July, 2024;
originally announced July 2024.
-
SecGenAI: Enhancing Security of Cloud-based Generative AI Applications within Australian Critical Technologies of National Interest
Authors:
Christoforus Yoga Haryanto,
Minh Hieu Vu,
Trung Duc Nguyen,
Emily Lomempow,
Yulia Nurliana,
Sona Taheri
Abstract:
The rapid advancement of Generative AI (GenAI) technologies offers transformative opportunities within Australia's critical technologies of national interest while introducing unique security challenges. This paper presents SecGenAI, a comprehensive security framework for cloud-based GenAI applications, with a focus on Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems. SecGenAI addresses functional, in…
▽ More
The rapid advancement of Generative AI (GenAI) technologies offers transformative opportunities within Australia's critical technologies of national interest while introducing unique security challenges. This paper presents SecGenAI, a comprehensive security framework for cloud-based GenAI applications, with a focus on Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems. SecGenAI addresses functional, infrastructure, and governance requirements, integrating end-to-end security analysis to generate specifications emphasizing data privacy, secure deployment, and shared responsibility models. Aligned with Australian Privacy Principles, AI Ethics Principles, and guidelines from the Australian Cyber Security Centre and Digital Transformation Agency, SecGenAI mitigates threats such as data leakage, adversarial attacks, and model inversion. The framework's novel approach combines advanced machine learning techniques with robust security measures, ensuring compliance with Australian regulations while enhancing the reliability and trustworthiness of GenAI systems. This research contributes to the field of intelligent systems by providing actionable strategies for secure GenAI implementation in industry, fostering innovation in AI applications, and safeguarding national interests.
△ Less
Submitted 1 July, 2024;
originally announced July 2024.
