Showing 1–2 of 2 results for author: Großmann, C

KVC-onGoing: Keystroke Verification Challenge

Authors: Giuseppe Stragapede, Ruben Vera-Rodriguez, Ruben Tolosana, Aythami Morales, Ivan DeAndres-Tame, Naser Damer, Julian Fierrez, Javier Ortega-Garcia, Alejandro Acien, Nahuel Gonzalez, Andrei Shadrikov, Dmitrii Gordin, Leon Schmitt, Daniel Wimmer, Christoph Großmann, Joerdis Krieger, Florian Heinz, Ron Krestel, Christoffer Mayer, Simon Haberl, Helena Gschrey, Yosuke Yamagishi, Sanjay Saha, Sanka Rasnayaka, Sandareka Wickramanayake , et al. (5 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: This article presents the Keystroke Verification Challenge - onGoing (KVC-onGoing), on which researchers can easily benchmark their systems in a common platform using large-scale public databases, the Aalto University Keystroke databases, and a standard experimental protocol. The keystroke data consist of tweet-long sequences of variable transcript text from over 185,000 subjects, acquired through… ▽ More This article presents the Keystroke Verification Challenge - onGoing (KVC-onGoing), on which researchers can easily benchmark their systems in a common platform using large-scale public databases, the Aalto University Keystroke databases, and a standard experimental protocol. The keystroke data consist of tweet-long sequences of variable transcript text from over 185,000 subjects, acquired through desktop and mobile keyboards simulating real-life conditions. The results on the evaluation set of KVC-onGoing have proved the high discriminative power of keystroke dynamics, reaching values as low as 3.33% of Equal Error Rate (EER) and 11.96% of False Non-Match Rate (FNMR) @1% False Match Rate (FMR) in the desktop scenario, and 3.61% of EER and 17.44% of FNMR @1% at FMR in the mobile scenario, significantly improving previous state-of-the-art results. Concerning demographic fairness, the analyzed scores reflect the subjects' age and gender to various extents, not negligible in a few cases. The framework runs on CodaLab. △ Less

Submitted 29 December, 2024; originally announced December 2024.

Comments: arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:2401.16559, arXiv:2311.06000

IEEE BigData 2023 Keystroke Verification Challenge (KVC)

Authors: Giuseppe Stragapede, Ruben Vera-Rodriguez, Ruben Tolosana, Aythami Morales, Ivan DeAndres-Tame, Naser Damer, Julian Fierrez, Javier-Ortega Garcia, Nahuel Gonzalez, Andrei Shadrikov, Dmitrii Gordin, Leon Schmitt, Daniel Wimmer, Christoph Grossmann, Joerdis Krieger, Florian Heinz, Ron Krestel, Christoffer Mayer, Simon Haberl, Helena Gschrey, Yosuke Yamagishi, Sanjay Saha, Sanka Rasnayaka, Sandareka Wickramanayake, Terence Sim , et al. (4 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: This paper describes the results of the IEEE BigData 2023 Keystroke Verification Challenge (KVC), that considers the biometric verification performance of Keystroke Dynamics (KD), captured as tweet-long sequences of variable transcript text from over 185,000 subjects. The data are obtained from two of the largest public databases of KD up to date, the Aalto Desktop and Mobile Keystroke Databases,… ▽ More This paper describes the results of the IEEE BigData 2023 Keystroke Verification Challenge (KVC), that considers the biometric verification performance of Keystroke Dynamics (KD), captured as tweet-long sequences of variable transcript text from over 185,000 subjects. The data are obtained from two of the largest public databases of KD up to date, the Aalto Desktop and Mobile Keystroke Databases, guaranteeing a minimum amount of data per subject, age and gender annotations, absence of corrupted data, and avoiding excessively unbalanced subject distributions with respect to the considered demographic attributes. Several neural architectures were proposed by the participants, leading to global Equal Error Rates (EERs) as low as 3.33% and 3.61% achieved by the best team respectively in the desktop and mobile scenario, outperforming the current state of the art biometric verification performance for KD. Hosted on CodaLab, the KVC will be made ongoing to represent a useful tool for the research community to compare different approaches under the same experimental conditions and to deepen the knowledge of the field. △ Less

Submitted 29 January, 2024; originally announced January 2024.

Comments: 9 pages, 10 pages, 2 figures. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:2311.06000