Delay Sensitivity Classification of Cloud Gaming Content
Authors:
Saeed Shafiee Sabet,
Steven Schmidt,
Saman Zadtootaghaj,
Carsten Griwodz,
Sebastian Moller
Abstract:
Cloud Gaming is an emerging service that catches growing interest in the research community as well as industry. While the paradigm shift from a game execution on clients to streaming games from the cloud offers a variety of benefits, the new services also require a highly reliable and low latency network to achieve a satisfying Quality of Experience (QoE) for its users. Using a cloud gaming servi…
▽ More
Cloud Gaming is an emerging service that catches growing interest in the research community as well as industry. While the paradigm shift from a game execution on clients to streaming games from the cloud offers a variety of benefits, the new services also require a highly reliable and low latency network to achieve a satisfying Quality of Experience (QoE) for its users. Using a cloud gaming service with high latency would harm the interaction of the user with the game, leading to a decrease in playing performance and thus frustration of players. However, the negative effect of delay on gaming QoE depends strongly on the game content. At a certain level of delay, a slow-paced card game is typically not as delay sensitive as a shooting game. For optimal resource allocation and quality estimation, it is highly important for cloud providers, game developers, and network planners to consider the impact of the game content. This paper contributes to a better understanding of the delay impact on QoE for cloud gaming applications by identifying game characteristics influencing the delay perception of users. In addition, an expert evaluation methodology to quantify these characteristics, as well as a delay sensitivity classification based on a decision tree is presented. The ratings of 14 experts for the quantification indicated an excellent level of agreement which demonstrates the reliability of the proposed method. Additionally, the decision tree reached an accuracy of 86.6 % on determining the delay sensitivity classes which were derived from a large dataset of subjective input quality ratings during a series of experiments.
△ Less
Submitted 7 January, 2021; v1 submitted 12 April, 2020;
originally announced April 2020.
MONROE-Nettest: A Configurable Tool for Dissecting Speed Measurements in Mobile Broadband Networks
Authors:
Cise Midoglu,
Leonhard Wimmer,
Andra Lutu,
Ozgu Alay,
Carsten Griwodz
Abstract:
As the demand for mobile connectivity continues to grow, there is a strong need to evaluate the performance of Mobile Broadband (MBB) networks. In the last years, mobile "speed", quantified most commonly by data rate, gained popularity as the widely accepted metric to describe their performance. However, there is a lack of consensus on how mobile speed should be measured. In this paper, we design…
▽ More
As the demand for mobile connectivity continues to grow, there is a strong need to evaluate the performance of Mobile Broadband (MBB) networks. In the last years, mobile "speed", quantified most commonly by data rate, gained popularity as the widely accepted metric to describe their performance. However, there is a lack of consensus on how mobile speed should be measured. In this paper, we design and implement MONROE-Nettest to dissect mobile speed measurements, and investigate the effect of different factors on speed measurements in the complex mobile ecosystem. MONROE-Nettest is built as an Experiment as a Service (EaaS) on top of the MONROE platform, an open dedicated platform for experimentation in operational MBB networks. Using MONROE-Nettest, we conduct a large scale measurement campaign and quantify the effects of measurement duration, number of TCP flows, and server location on measured downlink data rate in 6 operational MBB networks in Europe. Our results indicate that differences in parameter configuration can significantly affect the measurement results. We provide the complete MONROE-Nettest toolset as open source and our measurements as open data.
△ Less
Submitted 30 January, 2018; v1 submitted 21 October, 2017;
originally announced October 2017.
