Skip to main content

Showing 1–3 of 3 results for author: Griesmayer, A

Searching in archive cs. Search in all archives.
.
  1. arXiv:1609.00169  [pdf, ps, other

    cs.SE cs.LO

    Equivalence Checking a Floating-point Unit against a High-level C Model (Extended Version)

    Authors: Rajdeep Mukherjee, Saurabh Joshi, Andreas Griesmayer, Daniel Kroening, Tom Melham

    Abstract: Semiconductor companies have increasingly adopted a methodology that starts with a system-level design specification in C/C++/SystemC. This model is extensively simulated to ensure correct functionality and performance. Later, a Register Transfer Level (RTL) implementation is created in Verilog, either manually by a designer or automatically by a high-level synthesis tool. It is essential to check… ▽ More

    Submitted 1 September, 2016; originally announced September 2016.

    Comments: 14 pages

  2. arXiv:1306.4624  [pdf, other

    cs.CR cs.LO

    Automated Certification of Authorisation Policy Resistance

    Authors: Andreas Griesmayer, Charles Morisset

    Abstract: Attribute-based Access Control (ABAC) extends traditional Access Control by considering an access request as a set of pairs attribute name-value, making it particularly useful in the context of open and distributed systems, where security relevant information can be collected from different sources. However, ABAC enables attribute hiding attacks, allowing an attacker to gain some access by withhol… ▽ More

    Submitted 20 June, 2013; v1 submitted 19 June, 2013; originally announced June 2013.

    Comments: 20 pages, 4 figures, version including proofs of the paper that will be presented at ESORICS 2013

    ACM Class: D.4.6; K.6.5

  3. arXiv:1112.0215  [pdf, other

    cs.SE

    A Framework for Automated and Certified Refinement Steps

    Authors: Andreas Griesmayer, Zhiming Liu, Charles Morisset, Shuling Wang

    Abstract: The refinement calculus provides a methodology for transforming an abstract specification into a concrete implementation, by following a succession of refinement rules. These rules have been mechanized in theorem-provers, thus providing a formal and rigorous way to prove that a given program refines another one. In a previous work, we have extended this mechanization for object-oriented programs,… ▽ More

    Submitted 1 December, 2011; originally announced December 2011.

    Comments: 24 pages, submitted to Innovations in Systems and Software Engineering