Learning from FITS: Limitations in use in modern astronomical research
Authors:
Brian Thomas,
Tim Jenness,
Frossie Economou,
Perry Greenfield,
Paul Hirst,
David S. Berry,
Erik Bray,
Norman Gray,
Demitri Muna,
James Turner,
Miguel de Val-Borro,
Juande Santander-Vela,
David Shupe,
John Good,
G. Bruce Berriman,
Slava Kitaeff,
Jonathan Fay,
Omar Laurino,
Anastasia Alexov,
Walter Landry,
Joe Masters,
Adam Brazier,
Reinhold Schaaf,
Kevin Edwards,
Russell O. Redman
, et al. (13 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The Flexible Image Transport System (FITS) standard has been a great boon to astronomy, allowing observatories, scientists and the public to exchange astronomical information easily. The FITS standard, however, is showing its age. Developed in the late 1970s, the FITS authors made a number of implementation choices that, while common at the time, are now seen to limit its utility with modern data.…
▽ More
The Flexible Image Transport System (FITS) standard has been a great boon to astronomy, allowing observatories, scientists and the public to exchange astronomical information easily. The FITS standard, however, is showing its age. Developed in the late 1970s, the FITS authors made a number of implementation choices that, while common at the time, are now seen to limit its utility with modern data. The authors of the FITS standard could not anticipate the challenges which we are facing today in astronomical computing. Difficulties we now face include, but are not limited to, addressing the need to handle an expanded range of specialized data product types (data models), being more conducive to the networked exchange and storage of data, handling very large datasets, and capturing significantly more complex metadata and data relationships.
There are members of the community today who find some or all of these limitations unworkable, and have decided to move ahead with storing data in other formats. If this fragmentation continues, we risk abandoning the advantages of broad interoperability, and ready archivability, that the FITS format provides for astronomy. In this paper we detail some selected important problems which exist within the FITS standard today. These problems may provide insight into deeper underlying issues which reside in the format and we provide a discussion of some lessons learned. It is not our intention here to prescribe specific remedies to these issues; rather, it is to call attention of the FITS and greater astronomical computing communities to these problems in the hope that it will spur action to address them.
△ Less
Submitted 10 February, 2015; v1 submitted 3 February, 2015;
originally announced February 2015.
RuleCNL: A Controlled Natural Language for Business Rule Specifications
Authors:
Paul Brillant Feuto Njonko,
Sylviane Cardey,
Peter Greenfield,
Walid El Abed
Abstract:
Business rules represent the primary means by which companies define their business, perform their actions in order to reach their objectives. Thus, they need to be expressed unambiguously to avoid inconsistencies between business stakeholders and formally in order to be machine-processed. A promising solution is the use of a controlled natural language (CNL) which is a good mediator between natur…
▽ More
Business rules represent the primary means by which companies define their business, perform their actions in order to reach their objectives. Thus, they need to be expressed unambiguously to avoid inconsistencies between business stakeholders and formally in order to be machine-processed. A promising solution is the use of a controlled natural language (CNL) which is a good mediator between natural and formal languages. This paper presents RuleCNL, which is a CNL for defining business rules. Its core feature is the alignment of the business rule definition with the business vocabulary which ensures traceability and consistency with the business domain. The RuleCNL tool provides editors that assist end-users in the writing process and automatic mappings into the Semantics of Business Vocabulary and Business Rules (SBVR) standard. SBVR is grounded in first order logic and includes constructs called semantic formulations that structure the meaning of rules.
△ Less
Submitted 9 June, 2014;
originally announced June 2014.
Isolation Support for Service-based Applications: A Position Paper
Authors:
Paul Greenfield,
Alan Fekete,
Julian Jang,
Dean Kuo,
Surya Nepal
Abstract:
In this paper, we propose an approach to providing the benefits of isolation in service-oriented applications where it is not feasible to hold traditional locks for ACID transactions. Our technique, called "Promises", provides an uniform view for clients which covers a wide range of implementation techniques on the service side, all allowing the client to check a condition and then later rely on…
▽ More
In this paper, we propose an approach to providing the benefits of isolation in service-oriented applications where it is not feasible to hold traditional locks for ACID transactions. Our technique, called "Promises", provides an uniform view for clients which covers a wide range of implementation techniques on the service side, all allowing the client to check a condition and then later rely on that condition still holding.
△ Less
Submitted 21 December, 2006;
originally announced December 2006.
