Showing 1–4 of 4 results for author: Goldblatt, R

Canonicity in power and modal logics of finite achronal width

Authors: Robert Goldblatt, Ian Hodkinson

Abstract: We develop a method for showing that various modal logics that are valid in their countably generated canonical Kripke frames must also be valid in their uncountably generated ones. This is applied to many systems, including the logics of finite width, and a broader class of multimodal logics of `finite achronal width' that are introduced here. We develop a method for showing that various modal logics that are valid in their countably generated canonical Kripke frames must also be valid in their uncountably generated ones. This is applied to many systems, including the logics of finite width, and a broader class of multimodal logics of `finite achronal width' that are introduced here. △ Less

Submitted 25 July, 2022; originally announced July 2022.

MSC Class: 03B45; 06E25

Journal ref: The Review of Symbolic Logic 17 (2024) 705-735

Strong completeness of modal logics over 0-dimensional metric spaces

Authors: Robert Goldblatt, Ian Hodkinson

Abstract: We prove strong completeness results for some modal logics with the universal modality, with respect to their topological semantics over 0-dimensional dense-in-themselves metric spaces. We also use failure of compactness to show that, for some languages and spaces, no standard modal deductive system is strongly complete. We prove strong completeness results for some modal logics with the universal modality, with respect to their topological semantics over 0-dimensional dense-in-themselves metric spaces. We also use failure of compactness to show that, for some languages and spaces, no standard modal deductive system is strongly complete. △ Less

Submitted 28 November, 2019; v1 submitted 9 May, 2019; originally announced May 2019.

MSC Class: 03B45; 54E35

Journal ref: The Review of Symbolic Logic 13 (2020) 611-632

Spatial logic of modal mu-calculus and tangled closure operators

Authors: Robert Goldblatt, Ian Hodkinson

Abstract: There has been renewed interest in recent years in McKinsey and Tarski's interpretation of modal logic in topological spaces and their proof that S4 is the logic of any separable dense-in-itself metric space. Here we extend this work to the modal mu-calculus and to a logic of tangled closure operators that was developed by Fernández-Duque after these two languages had been shown by Dawar and Otto… ▽ More There has been renewed interest in recent years in McKinsey and Tarski's interpretation of modal logic in topological spaces and their proof that S4 is the logic of any separable dense-in-itself metric space. Here we extend this work to the modal mu-calculus and to a logic of tangled closure operators that was developed by Fernández-Duque after these two languages had been shown by Dawar and Otto to have the same expressive power over finite transitive Kripke models. We prove that this equivalence remains true over topological spaces. We establish the finite model property in Kripke semantics for various tangled closure logics with and without the universal modality $\forall$. We also extend the McKinsey--Tarski topological `dissection lemma'. These results are used to construct a representation map (also called a d-p-morphism) from any dense-in-itself metric space $X$ onto any finite connected locally connected serial transitive Kripke frame. This yields completeness theorems over $X$ for a number of languages: (i) the modal mu-calculus with the closure operator $\Diamond$; (ii) $\Diamond$ and the tangled closure operators $\langle t \rangle$; (iii) $\Diamond,\forall$; (iv) $\Diamond,\forall,\langle t \rangle$; (v) the derivative operator $\langle d \rangle$; (vi) $\langle d \rangle$ and the associated tangled closure operators $\langle dt \rangle$; (vii) $\langle d \rangle,\forall$; (viii) $\langle d \rangle,\forall,\langle dt \rangle$. Soundness also holds, if: (a) for languages with $\forall$, $X$ is connected; and (b) for languages with $\langle d \rangle$, $X$ validates the well known axiom $\mathrm{G}_1$. For countable languages without $\forall$, we prove strong completeness. We also show that in the presence of $\forall$, strong completeness fails if $X$ is compact and locally connected. △ Less

Submitted 5 March, 2016; originally announced March 2016.

MSC Class: 03B45; 54E35 ACM Class: F.4.1; I.2.4

Journal ref: Part I: Studia Logica, Volume 106, Issue 1, February 2018, 131-166; Part II: Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, Volume 168, Issue 5, May 2017, 1032-1090

Well structured program equivalence is highly undecidable

Authors: Robert Goldblatt, Marcel Jackson

Abstract: We show that strict deterministic propositional dynamic logic with intersection is highly undecidable, solving a problem in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. In fact we show something quite a bit stronger. We introduce the construction of program equivalence, which returns the value $\mathsf{T}$ precisely when two given programs are equivalent on halting computations. We show that virtually… ▽ More We show that strict deterministic propositional dynamic logic with intersection is highly undecidable, solving a problem in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. In fact we show something quite a bit stronger. We introduce the construction of program equivalence, which returns the value $\mathsf{T}$ precisely when two given programs are equivalent on halting computations. We show that virtually any variant of propositional dynamic logic has $Π_1^1$-hard validity problem if it can express even just the equivalence of well-structured programs with the empty program \texttt{skip}. We also show, in these cases, that the set of propositional statements valid over finite models is not recursively enumerable, so there is not even an axiomatisation for finitely valid propositions. △ Less

Submitted 7 March, 2011; originally announced March 2011.

Comments: 8 pages

Journal ref: ACM Transactions on Computational Logic, Volume 13 Issue 3, Article 26, August 2012