-
Analyzing users' sentiment towards popular consumer industries and brands on Twitter
Authors:
Guoning Hu,
Preeti Bhargava,
Saul Fuhrmann,
Sarah Ellinger,
Nemanja Spasojevic
Abstract:
Social media serves as a unified platform for users to express their thoughts on subjects ranging from their daily lives to their opinion on consumer brands and products. These users wield an enormous influence in shaping the opinions of other consumers and influence brand perception, brand loyalty and brand advocacy. In this paper, we analyze the opinion of 19M Twitter users towards 62 popular in…
▽ More
Social media serves as a unified platform for users to express their thoughts on subjects ranging from their daily lives to their opinion on consumer brands and products. These users wield an enormous influence in shaping the opinions of other consumers and influence brand perception, brand loyalty and brand advocacy. In this paper, we analyze the opinion of 19M Twitter users towards 62 popular industries, encompassing 12,898 enterprise and consumer brands, as well as associated subject matter topics, via sentiment analysis of 330M tweets over a period spanning a month. We find that users tend to be most positive towards manufacturing and most negative towards service industries. In addition, they tend to be more positive or negative when interacting with brands than generally on Twitter. We also find that sentiment towards brands within an industry varies greatly and we demonstrate this using two industries as use cases. In addition, we discover that there is no strong correlation between topic sentiments of different industries, demonstrating that topic sentiments are highly dependent on the context of the industry that they are mentioned in. We demonstrate the value of such an analysis in order to assess the impact of brands on social media. We hope that this initial study will prove valuable for both researchers and companies in understanding users' perception of industries, brands and associated topics and encourage more research in this field.
△ Less
Submitted 21 September, 2017;
originally announced September 2017.
-
Why feature dependencies challenge the requirements engineering of automotive systems: An empirical study
Authors:
Andreas Vogelsang,
Steffen Fuhrmann
Abstract:
Functional dependencies and feature interactions in automotive software systems are a major source of erroneous and deficient behavior. To overcome these problems, many approaches exist that focus on modeling these functional dependencies in early stages of system design. However, there are only few empirical studies that report on the extent of such dependencies in industrial software systems and…
▽ More
Functional dependencies and feature interactions in automotive software systems are a major source of erroneous and deficient behavior. To overcome these problems, many approaches exist that focus on modeling these functional dependencies in early stages of system design. However, there are only few empirical studies that report on the extent of such dependencies in industrial software systems and how they are considered in an industrial development context. In this paper, we analyze the functional architecture of a real automotive software system with the aim to assess the extent, awareness and importance of interactions between features of a future vehicle. Our results show that within the functional architecture at least 85% of the analyzed vehicle features depend on each other. They furthermore show that the developers are not aware of a large number of these dependencies when they are modeled solely on an architectural level. Therefore, the developers mention the need for a more precise specification of feature interactions, e.g., for the execution of comprehensive impact analyses. These results challenge the current development methods and emphasize the need for an extensive modeling of features and their dependencies in requirements engineering.
△ Less
Submitted 29 August, 2017;
originally announced August 2017.
-
Simplification of Multi-Scale Geometry using Adaptive Curvature Fields
Authors:
Patrick Seemann,
Simon Fuhrmann,
Stefan Guthe,
Fabian Langguth,
Michael Goesele
Abstract:
We present a novel algorithm to compute multi-scale curvature fields on triangle meshes. Our algorithm is based on finding robust mean curvatures using the ball neighborhood, where the radius of a ball corresponds to the scale of the features. The essential problem is to find a good radius for each ball to obtain a reliable curvature estimation. We propose an algorithm that finds suitable radii in…
▽ More
We present a novel algorithm to compute multi-scale curvature fields on triangle meshes. Our algorithm is based on finding robust mean curvatures using the ball neighborhood, where the radius of a ball corresponds to the scale of the features. The essential problem is to find a good radius for each ball to obtain a reliable curvature estimation. We propose an algorithm that finds suitable radii in an automatic way. In particular, our algorithm is applicable to meshes produced by image-based reconstruction systems. These meshes often contain geometric features at various scales, for example if certain regions have been captured in greater detail. We also show how such a multi-scale curvature field can be converted to a density field and used to guide applications like mesh simplification.
△ Less
Submitted 31 October, 2016; v1 submitted 24 October, 2016;
originally announced October 2016.
-
Virtual Rephotography: Novel View Prediction Error for 3D Reconstruction
Authors:
Michael Waechter,
Mate Beljan,
Simon Fuhrmann,
Nils Moehrle,
Johannes Kopf,
Michael Goesele
Abstract:
The ultimate goal of many image-based modeling systems is to render photo-realistic novel views of a scene without visible artifacts. Existing evaluation metrics and benchmarks focus mainly on the geometric accuracy of the reconstructed model, which is, however, a poor predictor of visual accuracy. Furthermore, using only geometric accuracy by itself does not allow evaluating systems that either l…
▽ More
The ultimate goal of many image-based modeling systems is to render photo-realistic novel views of a scene without visible artifacts. Existing evaluation metrics and benchmarks focus mainly on the geometric accuracy of the reconstructed model, which is, however, a poor predictor of visual accuracy. Furthermore, using only geometric accuracy by itself does not allow evaluating systems that either lack a geometric scene representation or utilize coarse proxy geometry. Examples include light field or image-based rendering systems. We propose a unified evaluation approach based on novel view prediction error that is able to analyze the visual quality of any method that can render novel views from input images. One of the key advantages of this approach is that it does not require ground truth geometry. This dramatically simplifies the creation of test datasets and benchmarks. It also allows us to evaluate the quality of an unknown scene during the acquisition and reconstruction process, which is useful for acquisition planning. We evaluate our approach on a range of methods including standard geometry-plus-texture pipelines as well as image-based rendering techniques, compare it to existing geometry-based benchmarks, and demonstrate its utility for a range of use cases.
△ Less
Submitted 26 January, 2016;
originally announced January 2016.
