Showing 1–2 of 2 results for author: Friedland, A

Are Mutually Intelligible Languages Easier to Translate?

Authors: Avital Friedland, Jonathan Zeltser, Omer Levy

Abstract: Two languages are considered mutually intelligible if their native speakers can communicate with each other, while using their own mother tongue. How does the fact that humans perceive a language pair as mutually intelligible affect the ability to learn a translation model between them? We hypothesize that the amount of data needed to train a neural ma-chine translation model is anti-proportional… ▽ More Two languages are considered mutually intelligible if their native speakers can communicate with each other, while using their own mother tongue. How does the fact that humans perceive a language pair as mutually intelligible affect the ability to learn a translation model between them? We hypothesize that the amount of data needed to train a neural ma-chine translation model is anti-proportional to the languages' mutual intelligibility. Experiments on the Romance language group reveal that there is indeed strong correlation between the area under a model's learning curve and mutual intelligibility scores obtained by studying human speakers. △ Less

Submitted 31 January, 2022; originally announced January 2022.

Predicting interviewee attitude and body language from speech descriptors

Authors: Yosef Solewicz, Chagay Orenshtein, Avital Friedland

Abstract: This present research investigated the relationship between personal impressions and the acoustic nonverbal communication conveyed by employees being interviewed. First, we investigated the extent to which different conversation topics addressed during the interview induced changes in the interviewees' acoustic parameters. Next, we attempted to predict the observed and self-assessed attitudes and… ▽ More This present research investigated the relationship between personal impressions and the acoustic nonverbal communication conveyed by employees being interviewed. First, we investigated the extent to which different conversation topics addressed during the interview induced changes in the interviewees' acoustic parameters. Next, we attempted to predict the observed and self-assessed attitudes and body language of the interviewees based on the acoustic data. The results showed that topicality caused significant deviations in the acoustic parameters statistics, but the ability to predict the personal perceptions of the interviewees based on their acoustic non-verbal communication was relatively independent of topicality, due to the natural redundancy inherent in acoustic attributes. Our findings suggest that joint modeling of speech and visual cues may improve the assessment of interviewee profiles. △ Less

Submitted 25 September, 2017; originally announced September 2017.