-
Expressiveness Results for Timed Modal Mu-Calculi
Authors:
Rance Cleaveland,
Jeroen J. A. Keiren,
Peter Fontana
Abstract:
This paper establishes relative expressiveness results for several modal mu-calculi interpreted over timed automata. These mu-calculi combine modalities for expressing passage of (real) time with a general framework for defining formulas recursively; several variants have been proposed in the literature. We show that one logic, which we call $L^{rel}_{ν,μ}$, is strictly more expressive than the ot…
▽ More
This paper establishes relative expressiveness results for several modal mu-calculi interpreted over timed automata. These mu-calculi combine modalities for expressing passage of (real) time with a general framework for defining formulas recursively; several variants have been proposed in the literature. We show that one logic, which we call $L^{rel}_{ν,μ}$, is strictly more expressive than the other mu-calculi considered. It is also more expressive than the temporal logic TCTL, while the other mu-calculi are incomparable with TCTL in the setting of general timed automata.
△ Less
Submitted 6 October, 2023;
originally announced October 2023.
-
Tutela: An Open-Source Tool for Assessing User-Privacy on Ethereum and Tornado Cash
Authors:
Mike Wu,
Will McTighe,
Kaili Wang,
Istvan A. Seres,
Nick Bax,
Manuel Puebla,
Mariano Mendez,
Federico Carrone,
Tomás De Mattey,
Herman O. Demaestri,
Mariano Nicolini,
Pedro Fontana
Abstract:
A common misconception among blockchain users is that pseudonymity guarantees privacy. The reality is almost the opposite. Every transaction one makes is recorded on a public ledger and reveals information about one's identity. Mixers, such as Tornado Cash, were developed to preserve privacy through "mixing" transactions with those of others in an anonymity pool, making it harder to link deposits…
▽ More
A common misconception among blockchain users is that pseudonymity guarantees privacy. The reality is almost the opposite. Every transaction one makes is recorded on a public ledger and reveals information about one's identity. Mixers, such as Tornado Cash, were developed to preserve privacy through "mixing" transactions with those of others in an anonymity pool, making it harder to link deposits and withdrawals from the pool. Unfortunately, it is still possible to reveal information about those in the anonymity pool if users are not careful. We introduce Tutela, an application built on expert heuristics to report the true anonymity of an Ethereum address. In particular, Tutela has three functionalities: first, it clusters together Ethereum addresses based on interaction history such that for an Ethereum address, we can identify other addresses likely owned by the same entity; second, it shows Ethereum users their potentially compromised transactions; third, Tutela computes the true size of the anonymity pool of each Tornado Cash mixer by excluding potentially compromised transactions. A public implementation of Tutela can be found at https://github.com/TutelaLabs/tutela-app. To use Tutela, visit https://www.tutela.xyz.
△ Less
Submitted 18 January, 2022;
originally announced January 2022.
-
Timed Automata Benchmark Description
Authors:
Peter Fontana,
Rance Cleaveland
Abstract:
This report contains the descriptions of the timed automata (models) and the properties (specifications) that are used as the "benchmark examples in Data structure choices for on-the-fly model checking of real-time systems" and "The power of proofs: New algorithms for timed automata model checking." The four models from those sources are: CSMA, FISCHER, LEADER, and GRC. Additionally we include in…
▽ More
This report contains the descriptions of the timed automata (models) and the properties (specifications) that are used as the "benchmark examples in Data structure choices for on-the-fly model checking of real-time systems" and "The power of proofs: New algorithms for timed automata model checking." The four models from those sources are: CSMA, FISCHER, LEADER, and GRC. Additionally we include in this report two additional models: FDDI and PATHOS. These six models are often used to benchmark timed automata model checker speed throughout timed automata model checking papers.
△ Less
Submitted 27 May, 2020;
originally announced May 2020.
-
Corrections to A Menagerie of Timed Automata
Authors:
Jeroen J. A. Keiren,
Peter Fontana,
Rance Cleaveland
Abstract:
This note corrects a technical error in the ACM Computing Surveys paper mentioned in the title. The flaw involved constructions for showing that timed automata with urgent locations have the same expressiveness as timed automata that allow false location invariants. Corrected con- structions are presented in this note, and the affected results are reproved.
This note corrects a technical error in the ACM Computing Surveys paper mentioned in the title. The flaw involved constructions for showing that timed automata with urgent locations have the same expressiveness as timed automata that allow false location invariants. Corrected con- structions are presented in this note, and the affected results are reproved.
△ Less
Submitted 23 February, 2016;
originally announced February 2016.
-
The Power of Proofs: New Algorithms for Timed Automata Model Checking (with Appendix)
Authors:
Peter Fontana,
Rance Cleaveland
Abstract:
This paper presents the first model-checking algorithm for an expressive modal mu-calculus over timed automata, $L^{\mathit{rel}, \mathit{af}}_{ν,μ}$, and reports performance results for an implementation. This mu-calculus contains extended time-modality operators and can express all of TCTL. Our algorithmic approach uses an "on-the-fly" strategy based on proof search as a means of ensuring high p…
▽ More
This paper presents the first model-checking algorithm for an expressive modal mu-calculus over timed automata, $L^{\mathit{rel}, \mathit{af}}_{ν,μ}$, and reports performance results for an implementation. This mu-calculus contains extended time-modality operators and can express all of TCTL. Our algorithmic approach uses an "on-the-fly" strategy based on proof search as a means of ensuring high performance for both positive and negative answers to model-checking questions. In particular, a set of proof rules for solving model-checking problems are given and proved sound and complete; we encode our algorithm in these proof rules and model-check a property by constructing a proof (or showing none exists) using these rules. One noteworthy aspect of our technique is that we show that verification performance can be improved with \emph{derived rules}, whose correctness can be inferred from the more primitive rules on which they are based. In this paper, we give the basic proof rules underlying our method, describe derived proof rules to improve performance, and compare our implementation of this model checker to the UPPAAL tool.
△ Less
Submitted 28 August, 2014; v1 submitted 26 August, 2014;
originally announced August 2014.
