Relational Norms for Human-AI Cooperation
Authors:
Brian D. Earp,
Sebastian Porsdam Mann,
Mateo Aboy,
Edmond Awad,
Monika Betzler,
Marietjie Botes,
Rachel Calcott,
Mina Caraccio,
Nick Chater,
Mark Coeckelbergh,
Mihaela Constantinescu,
Hossein Dabbagh,
Kate Devlin,
Xiaojun Ding,
Vilius Dranseika,
Jim A. C. Everett,
Ruiping Fan,
Faisal Feroz,
Kathryn B. Francis,
Cindy Friedman,
Orsolya Friedrich,
Iason Gabriel,
Ivar Hannikainen,
Julie Hellmann,
Arasj Khodadade Jahrome
, et al. (37 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
How we should design and interact with social artificial intelligence depends on the socio-relational role the AI is meant to emulate or occupy. In human society, relationships such as teacher-student, parent-child, neighbors, siblings, or employer-employee are governed by specific norms that prescribe or proscribe cooperative functions including hierarchy, care, transaction, and mating. These nor…
▽ More
How we should design and interact with social artificial intelligence depends on the socio-relational role the AI is meant to emulate or occupy. In human society, relationships such as teacher-student, parent-child, neighbors, siblings, or employer-employee are governed by specific norms that prescribe or proscribe cooperative functions including hierarchy, care, transaction, and mating. These norms shape our judgments of what is appropriate for each partner. For example, workplace norms may allow a boss to give orders to an employee, but not vice versa, reflecting hierarchical and transactional expectations. As AI agents and chatbots powered by large language models are increasingly designed to serve roles analogous to human positions - such as assistant, mental health provider, tutor, or romantic partner - it is imperative to examine whether and how human relational norms should extend to human-AI interactions. Our analysis explores how differences between AI systems and humans, such as the absence of conscious experience and immunity to fatigue, may affect an AI's capacity to fulfill relationship-specific functions and adhere to corresponding norms. This analysis, which is a collaborative effort by philosophers, psychologists, relationship scientists, ethicists, legal experts, and AI researchers, carries important implications for AI systems design, user behavior, and regulation. While we accept that AI systems can offer significant benefits such as increased availability and consistency in certain socio-relational roles, they also risk fostering unhealthy dependencies or unrealistic expectations that could spill over into human-human relationships. We propose that understanding and thoughtfully shaping (or implementing) suitable human-AI relational norms will be crucial for ensuring that human-AI interactions are ethical, trustworthy, and favorable to human well-being.
△ Less
Submitted 17 February, 2025;
originally announced February 2025.
The impact of generative artificial intelligence on socioeconomic inequalities and policy making
Authors:
Valerio Capraro,
Austin Lentsch,
Daron Acemoglu,
Selin Akgun,
Aisel Akhmedova,
Ennio Bilancini,
Jean-François Bonnefon,
Pablo Brañas-Garza,
Luigi Butera,
Karen M. Douglas,
Jim A. C. Everett,
Gerd Gigerenzer,
Christine Greenhow,
Daniel A. Hashimoto,
Julianne Holt-Lunstad,
Jolanda Jetten,
Simon Johnson,
Chiara Longoni,
Pete Lunn,
Simone Natale,
Iyad Rahwan,
Neil Selwyn,
Vivek Singh,
Siddharth Suri,
Jennifer Sutcliffe
, et al. (6 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Generative artificial intelligence has the potential to both exacerbate and ameliorate existing socioeconomic inequalities. In this article, we provide a state-of-the-art interdisciplinary overview of the potential impacts of generative AI on (mis)information and three information-intensive domains: work, education, and healthcare. Our goal is to highlight how generative AI could worsen existing i…
▽ More
Generative artificial intelligence has the potential to both exacerbate and ameliorate existing socioeconomic inequalities. In this article, we provide a state-of-the-art interdisciplinary overview of the potential impacts of generative AI on (mis)information and three information-intensive domains: work, education, and healthcare. Our goal is to highlight how generative AI could worsen existing inequalities while illuminating how AI may help mitigate pervasive social problems. In the information domain, generative AI can democratize content creation and access, but may dramatically expand the production and proliferation of misinformation. In the workplace, it can boost productivity and create new jobs, but the benefits will likely be distributed unevenly. In education, it offers personalized learning, but may widen the digital divide. In healthcare, it might improve diagnostics and accessibility, but could deepen pre-existing inequalities. In each section we cover a specific topic, evaluate existing research, identify critical gaps, and recommend research directions, including explicit trade-offs that complicate the derivation of a priori hypotheses. We conclude with a section highlighting the role of policymaking to maximize generative AI's potential to reduce inequalities while mitigating its harmful effects. We discuss strengths and weaknesses of existing policy frameworks in the European Union, the United States, and the United Kingdom, observing that each fails to fully confront the socioeconomic challenges we have identified. We propose several concrete policies that could promote shared prosperity through the advancement of generative AI. This article emphasizes the need for interdisciplinary collaborations to understand and address the complex challenges of generative AI.
△ Less
Submitted 6 May, 2024; v1 submitted 16 December, 2023;
originally announced January 2024.
