-
Rician likelihood loss for quantitative MRI using self-supervised deep learning
Authors:
Christopher S. Parker,
Anna Schroder,
Sean C. Epstein,
James Cole,
Daniel C. Alexander,
Hui Zhang
Abstract:
Purpose: Previous quantitative MR imaging studies using self-supervised deep learning have reported biased parameter estimates at low SNR. Such systematic errors arise from the choice of Mean Squared Error (MSE) loss function for network training, which is incompatible with Rician-distributed MR magnitude signals. To address this issue, we introduce the negative log Rician likelihood (NLR) loss. M…
▽ More
Purpose: Previous quantitative MR imaging studies using self-supervised deep learning have reported biased parameter estimates at low SNR. Such systematic errors arise from the choice of Mean Squared Error (MSE) loss function for network training, which is incompatible with Rician-distributed MR magnitude signals. To address this issue, we introduce the negative log Rician likelihood (NLR) loss. Methods: A numerically stable and accurate implementation of the NLR loss was developed to estimate quantitative parameters of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) model and intra-voxel incoherent motion (IVIM) model. Parameter estimation accuracy, precision and overall error were evaluated in terms of bias, variance and root mean squared error and compared against the MSE loss over a range of SNRs (5 - 30). Results: Networks trained with NLR loss show higher estimation accuracy than MSE for the ADC and IVIM diffusion coefficients as SNR decreases, with minimal loss of precision or total error. At high effective SNR (high SNR and small diffusion coefficients), both losses show comparable accuracy and precision for all parameters of both models. Conclusion: The proposed NLR loss is numerically stable and accurate across the full range of tested SNRs and improves parameter estimation accuracy of diffusion coefficients using self-supervised deep learning. We expect the development to benefit quantitative MR imaging techniques broadly, enabling more accurate parameter estimation from noisy data.
△ Less
Submitted 13 July, 2023;
originally announced July 2023.
-
Fitting a Directional Microstructure Model to Diffusion-Relaxation MRI Data with Self-Supervised Machine Learning
Authors:
Jason P. Lim,
Stefano B. Blumberg,
Neil Narayan,
Sean C. Epstein,
Daniel C. Alexander,
Marco Palombo,
Paddy J. Slator
Abstract:
Machine learning is a powerful approach for fitting microstructural models to diffusion MRI data. Early machine learning microstructure imaging implementations trained regressors to estimate model parameters in a supervised way, using synthetic training data with known ground truth. However, a drawback of this approach is that the choice of training data impacts fitted parameter values. Self-super…
▽ More
Machine learning is a powerful approach for fitting microstructural models to diffusion MRI data. Early machine learning microstructure imaging implementations trained regressors to estimate model parameters in a supervised way, using synthetic training data with known ground truth. However, a drawback of this approach is that the choice of training data impacts fitted parameter values. Self-supervised learning is emerging as an attractive alternative to supervised learning in this context. Thus far, both supervised and self-supervised learning have typically been applied to isotropic models, such as intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM), as opposed to models where the directionality of anisotropic structures is also estimated. In this paper, we demonstrate self-supervised machine learning model fitting for a directional microstructural model. In particular, we fit a combined T1-ball-stick model to the multidimensional diffusion (MUDI) challenge diffusion-relaxation dataset. Our self-supervised approach shows clear improvements in parameter estimation and computational time, for both simulated and in-vivo brain data, compared to standard non-linear least squares fitting. Code for the artificial neural net constructed for this study is available for public use from the following GitHub repository: https://github.com/jplte/deep-T1-ball-stick
△ Less
Submitted 5 October, 2022;
originally announced October 2022.
-
Choice of training label matters: how to best use deep learning for quantitative MRI parameter estimation
Authors:
Sean C. Epstein,
Timothy J. P. Bray,
Margaret Hall-Craggs,
Hui Zhang
Abstract:
Deep learning (DL) is gaining popularity as a parameter estimation method for quantitative MRI. A range of competing implementations have been proposed, relying on either supervised or self-supervised learning. Self-supervised approaches, sometimes referred to as unsupervised, have been loosely based on auto-encoders, whereas supervised methods have, to date, been trained on groundtruth labels. Th…
▽ More
Deep learning (DL) is gaining popularity as a parameter estimation method for quantitative MRI. A range of competing implementations have been proposed, relying on either supervised or self-supervised learning. Self-supervised approaches, sometimes referred to as unsupervised, have been loosely based on auto-encoders, whereas supervised methods have, to date, been trained on groundtruth labels. These two learning paradigms have been shown to have distinct strengths. Notably, self-supervised approaches have offered lower-bias parameter estimates than their supervised alternatives. This result is counterintuitive - incorporating prior knowledge with supervised labels should, in theory, lead to improved accuracy. In this work, we show that this apparent limitation of supervised approaches stems from the naive choice of groundtruth training labels. By training on labels which are deliberately not groundtruth, we show that the low-bias parameter estimation previously associated with self-supervised methods can be replicated - and improved on - within a supervised learning framework. This approach sets the stage for a single, unifying, deep learning parameter estimation framework, based on supervised learning, where trade-offs between bias and variance are made by careful adjustment of training label.
△ Less
Submitted 23 January, 2024; v1 submitted 11 May, 2022;
originally announced May 2022.
