-
In industrial embedded software, are some compilation errors easier to localize and fix than others?
Authors:
Han Fu,
Sigrid Eldh,
Kristian Wiklund,
Andreas Ermedahl,
Philipp Haller,
Cyrille Artho
Abstract:
Industrial embedded systems often require specialized hardware. However, software engineers have access to such domain-specific hardware only at the continuous integration (CI) stage and have to use simulated hardware otherwise. This results in a higher proportion of compilation errors at the CI stage than in other types of systems, warranting a deeper study.
To this end, we create a CI diagnost…
▽ More
Industrial embedded systems often require specialized hardware. However, software engineers have access to such domain-specific hardware only at the continuous integration (CI) stage and have to use simulated hardware otherwise. This results in a higher proportion of compilation errors at the CI stage than in other types of systems, warranting a deeper study.
To this end, we create a CI diagnostics solution called ``Shadow Job'' that analyzes our industrial CI system. We collected over 40000 builds from 4 projects from the product source code and categorized the compilation errors into 14 error types, showing that the five most common ones comprise 89 % of all compilation errors. Additionally, we analyze the resolution time, size, and distance for each error type, to see if different types of compilation errors are easier to localize or repair than others.
Our results show that the resolution time, size, and distance are independent of each other. Our research also provides insights into the human effort required to fix the most common industrial compilation errors. We also identify the most promising directions for future research on fault localization.
△ Less
Submitted 23 April, 2024;
originally announced April 2024.
-
Software Test Automation Maturity -- A Survey of the State of the Practice
Authors:
Yuqing Wang,
Mika V. Mäntylä,
Serge Demeyer,
Kristian Wiklund,
Sigrid Eldh,
Tatu Kairi
Abstract:
The software industry has seen an increasing interest in test automation. In this paper, we present a test automation maturity survey serving as a self-assessment for practitioners. Based on responses of 151 practitioners coming from above 101 organizations in 25 countries, we make observations regarding the state of the practice of test automation maturity: a) The level of test automation maturit…
▽ More
The software industry has seen an increasing interest in test automation. In this paper, we present a test automation maturity survey serving as a self-assessment for practitioners. Based on responses of 151 practitioners coming from above 101 organizations in 25 countries, we make observations regarding the state of the practice of test automation maturity: a) The level of test automation maturity in different organizations is differentiated by the practices they adopt; b) Practitioner reported the quite diverse situation with respect to different practices, e.g., 85\% practitioners agreed that their test teams have enough test automation expertise and skills, while 47\% of practitioners admitted that there is lack of guidelines on designing and executing automated tests; c) Some practices are strongly correlated and/or closely clustered; d) The percentage of automated test cases and the use of Agile and/or DevOps development models are good indicators for a higher test automation maturity level; (e) The roles of practitioners may affect response variation, e.g., QA engineers give the most optimistic answers, consultants give the most pessimistic answers. Our results give an insight into present test automation processes and practices and indicate chances for further improvement in the present industry.
△ Less
Submitted 20 April, 2020;
originally announced April 2020.
-
A self-assessment Instrument for assessing test automation maturity
Authors:
Yuqing Wang,
Mika Mäntylä,
Sigrid Eldh,
Jouni Markkula,
Kristian Wiklund,
Tatu Kairi,
Päivi Raulamo-Jurvanen,
Antti Haukinen
Abstract:
Test automation is important in software industry but self-assessment instruments for assessing its maturity are not sufficient. The two objectives of this study are to synthesize what an organization should focus to assess its test automation; develop a self-assessment instrument (a survey) for assessing test automation maturity and scientifically evaluate it. We carried out the study in four sta…
▽ More
Test automation is important in software industry but self-assessment instruments for assessing its maturity are not sufficient. The two objectives of this study are to synthesize what an organization should focus to assess its test automation; develop a self-assessment instrument (a survey) for assessing test automation maturity and scientifically evaluate it. We carried out the study in four stages. First, a literature review of 25 sources was conducted. Second, the initial instrument was developed. Third, seven experts from five companies evaluated the initial instrument. Content Validity Index and Cognitive Interview methods were used. Fourth, we revised the developed instrument. Our contributions are as follows: (a) we collected practices mapped into 15 KAs that indicate where an organization should focus to assess its test automation; (b) we developed and evaluated a self-assessment instrument for assessing test automation maturity; (c) we discuss important topics such as response bias that threatens self-assessment instruments. Our results help companies and researchers to understand and improve test automation practices and processes.
△ Less
Submitted 11 April, 2019;
originally announced April 2019.
-
Automatic Quality Assurance and Release (Report from Dagstuhl Seminar 18122)
Authors:
Bram Adams,
Benoit Baudry,
Sigrid Eldh,
Andy Zaidman,
Gerald Schermann
Abstract:
This report documents the program and the outcomes of Dagstuhl Seminar 18122 "Automatic Quality Assurance and Release". The main goal of this seminar was to bridge the knowledge divide on how researchers and industry professionals reason about and implement DevOps for automatic quality assurance. Through the seminar, we have built up a common understanding of DevOps tools and practices, but we hav…
▽ More
This report documents the program and the outcomes of Dagstuhl Seminar 18122 "Automatic Quality Assurance and Release". The main goal of this seminar was to bridge the knowledge divide on how researchers and industry professionals reason about and implement DevOps for automatic quality assurance. Through the seminar, we have built up a common understanding of DevOps tools and practices, but we have also identified major academic and educational challenges for this field of research.
△ Less
Submitted 20 December, 2018;
originally announced December 2018.
