-
Upper Dominating Set: Tight Algorithms for Pathwidth and Sub-Exponential Approximation
Authors:
Louis Dublois,
Michael Lampis,
Vangelis Th. Paschos
Abstract:
An upper dominating set is a minimal dominating set in a graph. In the \textsc{Upper Dominating Set} problem, the goal is to find an upper dominating set of maximum size. We study the complexity of parameterized algorithms for \textsc{Upper Dominating Set}, as well as its sub-exponential approximation. First, we prove that, under ETH, \textsc{$k$-Upper Dominating Set} cannot be solved in time…
▽ More
An upper dominating set is a minimal dominating set in a graph. In the \textsc{Upper Dominating Set} problem, the goal is to find an upper dominating set of maximum size. We study the complexity of parameterized algorithms for \textsc{Upper Dominating Set}, as well as its sub-exponential approximation. First, we prove that, under ETH, \textsc{$k$-Upper Dominating Set} cannot be solved in time $O(n^{o(k)})$ (improving on $O(n^{o(\sqrt{k})})$), and in the same time we show under the same complexity assumption that for any constant ratio $r$ and any $\varepsilon > 0$, there is no $r$-approximation algorithm running in time $O(n^{k^{1-\varepsilon}})$. Then, we settle the problem's complexity parameterized by pathwidth by giving an algorithm running in time $O^*(6^{pw})$ (improving the current best $O^*(7^{pw})$), and a lower bound showing that our algorithm is the best we can get under the SETH. Furthermore, we obtain a simple sub-exponential approximation algorithm for this problem: an algorithm that produces an $r$-approximation in time $n^{O(n/r)}$, for any desired approximation ratio $r < n$. We finally show that this time-approximation trade-off is tight, up to an arbitrarily small constant in the second exponent: under the randomized ETH, and for any ratio $r > 1$ and $\varepsilon > 0$, no algorithm can output an $r$-approximation in time $n^{(n/r)^{1-\varepsilon}}$. Hence, we completely characterize the approximability of the problem in sub-exponential time.
△ Less
Submitted 19 January, 2021;
originally announced January 2021.
-
(In)approximability of Maximum Minimal FVS
Authors:
Louis Dublois,
Tesshu Hanaka,
Mehdi Khosravian Ghadikolaei,
Michael Lampis,
Nikolaos Melissinos
Abstract:
We study the approximability of the NP-complete \textsc{Maximum Minimal Feedback Vertex Set} problem. Informally, this natural problem seems to lie in an intermediate space between two more well-studied problems of this type: \textsc{Maximum Minimal Vertex Cover}, for which the best achievable approximation ratio is $\sqrt{n}$, and \textsc{Upper Dominating Set}, which does not admit any $n^{1-ε}$…
▽ More
We study the approximability of the NP-complete \textsc{Maximum Minimal Feedback Vertex Set} problem. Informally, this natural problem seems to lie in an intermediate space between two more well-studied problems of this type: \textsc{Maximum Minimal Vertex Cover}, for which the best achievable approximation ratio is $\sqrt{n}$, and \textsc{Upper Dominating Set}, which does not admit any $n^{1-ε}$ approximation. We confirm and quantify this intuition by showing the first non-trivial polynomial time approximation for \textsc{Max Min FVS} with a ratio of $O(n^{2/3})$, as well as a matching hardness of approximation bound of $n^{2/3-ε}$, improving the previous known hardness of $n^{1/2-ε}$. The approximation algorithm also gives a cubic kernel when parameterized by the solution size. Along the way, we also obtain an $O(Δ)$-approximation and show that this is asymptotically best possible, and we improve the bound for which the problem is NP-hard from $Δ\ge 9$ to $Δ\ge 6$.
Having settled the problem's approximability in polynomial time, we move to the context of super-polynomial time. We devise a generalization of our approximation algorithm which, for any desired approximation ratio $r$, produces an $r$-approximate solution in time $n^{O(n/r^{3/2})}$. This time-approximation trade-off is essentially tight: we show that under the ETH, for any ratio $r$ and $ε>0$, no algorithm can $r$-approximate this problem in time $n^{O((n/r^{3/2})^{1-ε})}$, hence we precisely characterize the approximability of the problem for the whole spectrum between polynomial and sub-exponential time, up to an arbitrarily small constant in the second exponent.
△ Less
Submitted 10 February, 2021; v1 submitted 21 September, 2020;
originally announced September 2020.
-
New Algorithms for Mixed Dominating Set
Authors:
Louis Dublois,
Michael Lampis,
Vangelis Th. Paschos
Abstract:
A mixed dominating set is a collection of vertices and edges that dominates all vertices and edges of a graph. We study the complexity of exact and parameterized algorithms for \textsc{Mixed Dominating Set}, resolving some open questions. In particular, we settle the problem's complexity parameterized by treewidth and pathwidth by giving an algorithm running in time $O^*(5^{tw})$ (improving the cu…
▽ More
A mixed dominating set is a collection of vertices and edges that dominates all vertices and edges of a graph. We study the complexity of exact and parameterized algorithms for \textsc{Mixed Dominating Set}, resolving some open questions. In particular, we settle the problem's complexity parameterized by treewidth and pathwidth by giving an algorithm running in time $O^*(5^{tw})$ (improving the current best $O^*(6^{tw})$), as well as a lower bound showing that our algorithm cannot be improved under the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis (SETH), even if parameterized by pathwidth (improving a lower bound of $O^*((2 - \varepsilon)^{pw})$). Furthermore, by using a simple but so far overlooked observation on the structure of minimal solutions, we obtain branching algorithms which improve both the best known FPT algorithm for this problem, from $O^*(4.172^k)$ to $O^*(3.510^k)$, and the best known exponential-time exact algorithm, from $O^*(2^n)$ and exponential space, to $O^*(1.912^n)$ and polynomial space.
△ Less
Submitted 26 April, 2021; v1 submitted 20 November, 2019;
originally announced November 2019.
