Showing 1–2 of 2 results for author: Drey, T

Questionnaires and Qualitative Feedback Methods to Measure User Experience in Mixed Reality

Authors: Tobias Drey, Michael Rietzler, Enrico Rukzio

Abstract: Evaluating the user experience of a software system is an essential final step of every research. Several concepts such as flow, affective state, presences, or immersion exist to measure user experience. Typical measurement techniques analyze physiological data, gameplay data, and questionnaires. Qualitative feedback methods are another approach to collect detailed user insights. In this position… ▽ More Evaluating the user experience of a software system is an essential final step of every research. Several concepts such as flow, affective state, presences, or immersion exist to measure user experience. Typical measurement techniques analyze physiological data, gameplay data, and questionnaires. Qualitative feedback methods are another approach to collect detailed user insights. In this position paper, we will discuss how we used questionnaires and qualitative feedback methods in previous mixed reality work to measure user experience. We will present several measurement examples, discuss their current limitations, and provide guideline propositions to support comparable mixed reality user experience research in the future. △ Less

Submitted 13 April, 2021; originally announced April 2021.

Discussing the Risks of Adaptive Virtual Environments for User Autonomy

Authors: Tobias Drey, Enrico Rukzio

Abstract: Adaptive virtual environments are an opportunity to support users and increase their flow, presence, immersion, and overall experience. Possible fields of application are adaptive individual education, gameplay adjustment, professional work, and personalized content. But who benefits more from this adaptivity, the users who can enjoy a greater user experience or the companies or governments who ar… ▽ More Adaptive virtual environments are an opportunity to support users and increase their flow, presence, immersion, and overall experience. Possible fields of application are adaptive individual education, gameplay adjustment, professional work, and personalized content. But who benefits more from this adaptivity, the users who can enjoy a greater user experience or the companies or governments who are completely in control of the provided content. While the user autonomy decreases for individuals, the power of institutions raises, and the risk exists that personal opinions are precisely controlled. In this position paper, we will argue that researchers should not only propose the benefits of their work but also critically discuss what are possible abusive use cases. Therefore, we will examine two use cases in the fields of professional work and personalized content and show possible abusive use. △ Less

Submitted 7 January, 2021; originally announced January 2021.

Comments: Presented at the workshop "Exploring Potentially Abusive Ethical, Social and Political Implications of Mixed Reality Research in HCI", CHI '20, April 25-30, Honolulu, HI, USA