From Event-B to Verified C via HLL
Authors:
Ning Ge,
Arnaud Dieumegard,
Eric Jenn,
Laurent Voisin
Abstract:
This work addresses the correct translation of an Event-B model to C code via an intermediate formal language, HLL. The proof of correctness follows two main steps. First, the final refinement of the Event-B model, including invariants, is translated to HLL. At that point, additional properties (e.g., deadlock-freeness, liveness properties, etc.) are added to the HLL model. The proof of the invari…
▽ More
This work addresses the correct translation of an Event-B model to C code via an intermediate formal language, HLL. The proof of correctness follows two main steps. First, the final refinement of the Event-B model, including invariants, is translated to HLL. At that point, additional properties (e.g., deadlock-freeness, liveness properties, etc.) are added to the HLL model. The proof of the invariants and additional properties at the HLL level guarantees the correctness of the translation. Second, the C code is automatically generated from the HLL model for most of the system functions and manually for the remaining ones; in this case, the HLL model provides formal contracts to the software developer. An equivalence proof between the C code and the HLL model guarantees the correctness of the code.
△ Less
Submitted 24 October, 2016;
originally announced October 2016.
From Design to Implementation: an Automated, Credible Autocoding Chain for Control Systems
Authors:
Timothy Wang,
Romain Jobredeaux,
Heber Herencia,
Pierre-Loic Garoche,
Arnaud Dieumegard,
Eric Feron,
Marc Pantel
Abstract:
This article describes a fully automated, credible autocoding chain for control systems. The framework generates code, along with guarantees of high level functional properties which can be independently verified. It relies on domain specific knowledge and fomal methods of analysis to address a context of heightened safety requirements for critical embedded systems and ever-increasing costs of ver…
▽ More
This article describes a fully automated, credible autocoding chain for control systems. The framework generates code, along with guarantees of high level functional properties which can be independently verified. It relies on domain specific knowledge and fomal methods of analysis to address a context of heightened safety requirements for critical embedded systems and ever-increasing costs of verification and validation. The platform strives to bridge the semantic gap between domain expert and code verification expert. First, a graphical dataflow language is extended with annotation symbols enabling the control engineer to express high level properties of its control law within the framework of a familiar language. An existing autocoder is enhanced to both generate the code implementing the initial design, but also to carry high level properties down to annotations at the level of the code. Finally, using customized code analysis tools, certificates are generated which guarantee the correctness of the annotations with respect to the code, and can be verified using existing static analysis tools. Only a subset of properties and controllers are handled at this point.
△ Less
Submitted 25 August, 2013; v1 submitted 9 July, 2013;
originally announced July 2013.
