-
From Consumption to Collaboration: Measuring Interaction Patterns to Augment Human Cognition in Open-Ended Tasks
Authors:
Joshua Holstein,
Moritz Diener,
Philipp Spitzer
Abstract:
The rise of Generative AI, and Large Language Models (LLMs) in particular, is fundamentally changing cognitive processes in knowledge work, raising critical questions about their impact on human reasoning and problem-solving capabilities. As these AI systems become increasingly integrated into workflows, they offer unprecedented opportunities for augmenting human thinking while simultaneously risk…
▽ More
The rise of Generative AI, and Large Language Models (LLMs) in particular, is fundamentally changing cognitive processes in knowledge work, raising critical questions about their impact on human reasoning and problem-solving capabilities. As these AI systems become increasingly integrated into workflows, they offer unprecedented opportunities for augmenting human thinking while simultaneously risking cognitive erosion through passive consumption of generated answers. This tension is particularly pronounced in open-ended tasks, where effective solutions require deep contextualization and integration of domain knowledge. Unlike structured tasks with established metrics, measuring the quality of human-LLM interaction in such open-ended tasks poses significant challenges due to the absence of ground truth and the iterative nature of solution development. To address this, we present a framework that analyzes interaction patterns along two dimensions: cognitive activity mode (exploration vs. exploitation) and cognitive engagement mode (constructive vs. detrimental). This framework provides systematic measurements to evaluate when LLMs are effective tools for thought rather than substitutes for human cognition, advancing theoretical understanding and practical guidance for developing AI systems that protect and augment human cognitive capabilities.
△ Less
Submitted 3 April, 2025;
originally announced April 2025.
-
Thread and Data Mapping in Software Transactional Memory: An Overview
Authors:
Douglas Pereira Pasqualin,
Matthias Diener,
André Rauber Du Bois,
Maurício Lima Pilla
Abstract:
In current microarchitectures, due to the complex memory hierarchies and different latencies on memory accesses, thread and data mapping are important issues to improve application performance. Software transactional memory (STM) is an abstraction used for thread synchronization, replacing the use of locks in parallel programming. Regarding thread and data mapping, STM presents new challenges and…
▽ More
In current microarchitectures, due to the complex memory hierarchies and different latencies on memory accesses, thread and data mapping are important issues to improve application performance. Software transactional memory (STM) is an abstraction used for thread synchronization, replacing the use of locks in parallel programming. Regarding thread and data mapping, STM presents new challenges and mapping opportunities, since (1) STM can use different conflict detection and resolution strategies, making the behavior of the application less predictable and; (2) the STM runtime has precise information about shared data and the intensity with each thread accesses them. These unique characteristics provide many opportunities for low-overhead, but precise statistics to guide mapping strategies for STM applications. The main objective of this paper is to survey the existing work about thread and data mapping that uses solely information gathered from the STM runtime to guide thread and data mapping decisions. We also discuss future research directions within this research area.
△ Less
Submitted 25 February, 2025; v1 submitted 2 June, 2022;
originally announced June 2022.
-
Performance Evaluation of Python Parallel Programming Models: Charm4Py and mpi4py
Authors:
Zane Fink,
Simeng Liu,
Jaemin Choi,
Matthias Diener,
Laxmikant V. Kale
Abstract:
Python is rapidly becoming the lingua franca of machine learning and scientific computing. With the broad use of frameworks such as Numpy, SciPy, and TensorFlow, scientific computing and machine learning are seeing a productivity boost on systems without a requisite loss in performance. While high-performance libraries often provide adequate performance within a node, distributed computing is requ…
▽ More
Python is rapidly becoming the lingua franca of machine learning and scientific computing. With the broad use of frameworks such as Numpy, SciPy, and TensorFlow, scientific computing and machine learning are seeing a productivity boost on systems without a requisite loss in performance. While high-performance libraries often provide adequate performance within a node, distributed computing is required to scale Python across nodes and make it genuinely competitive in large-scale high-performance computing. Many frameworks, such as Charm4Py, DaCe, Dask, Legate Numpy, mpi4py, and Ray, scale Python across nodes. However, little is known about these frameworks' relative strengths and weaknesses, leaving practitioners and scientists without enough information about which frameworks are suitable for their requirements. In this paper, we seek to narrow this knowledge gap by studying the relative performance of two such frameworks: Charm4Py and mpi4py.
We perform a comparative performance analysis of Charm4Py and mpi4py using CPU and GPU-based microbenchmarks other representative mini-apps for scientific computing.
△ Less
Submitted 11 November, 2021; v1 submitted 8 November, 2021;
originally announced November 2021.
