Prototyping with Prompts: Emerging Approaches and Challenges in Generative AI Design for Collaborative Software Teams
Authors:
Hari Subramonyam,
Divy Thakkar,
Andrew Ku,
Jürgen Dieber,
Anoop Sinha
Abstract:
Generative AI models are increasingly being integrated into human task workflows, enabling the production of expressive content across a wide range of contexts. Unlike traditional human-AI design methods, the new approach to designing generative capabilities focuses heavily on prompt engineering strategies. This shift requires a deeper understanding of how collaborative software teams establish an…
▽ More
Generative AI models are increasingly being integrated into human task workflows, enabling the production of expressive content across a wide range of contexts. Unlike traditional human-AI design methods, the new approach to designing generative capabilities focuses heavily on prompt engineering strategies. This shift requires a deeper understanding of how collaborative software teams establish and apply design guidelines, iteratively prototype prompts, and evaluate them to achieve specific outcomes. To explore these dynamics, we conducted design studies with 39 industry professionals, including UX designers, AI engineers, and product managers. Our findings highlight emerging practices and role shifts in AI system prototyping among multistakeholder teams. We observe various prompting and prototyping strategies, highlighting the pivotal role of to-be-generated content characteristics in enabling rapid, iterative prototyping with generative AI. By identifying associated challenges, such as the limited model interpretability and overfitting the design to specific example content, we outline considerations for generative AI prototyping.
△ Less
Submitted 30 March, 2025; v1 submitted 27 February, 2024;
originally announced February 2024.
Why model why? Assessing the strengths and limitations of LIME
Authors:
Jürgen Dieber,
Sabrina Kirrane
Abstract:
When it comes to complex machine learning models, commonly referred to as black boxes, understanding the underlying decision making process is crucial for domains such as healthcare and financial services, and also when it is used in connection with safety critical systems such as autonomous vehicles. As such interest in explainable artificial intelligence (xAI) tools and techniques has increased…
▽ More
When it comes to complex machine learning models, commonly referred to as black boxes, understanding the underlying decision making process is crucial for domains such as healthcare and financial services, and also when it is used in connection with safety critical systems such as autonomous vehicles. As such interest in explainable artificial intelligence (xAI) tools and techniques has increased in recent years. However, the effectiveness of existing xAI frameworks, especially concerning algorithms that work with data as opposed to images, is still an open research question. In order to address this gap, in this paper we examine the effectiveness of the Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations (LIME) xAI framework, one of the most popular model agnostic frameworks found in the literature, with a specific focus on its performance in terms of making tabular models more interpretable. In particular, we apply several state of the art machine learning algorithms on a tabular dataset, and demonstrate how LIME can be used to supplement conventional performance assessment methods. In addition, we evaluate the understandability of the output produced by LIME both via a usability study, involving participants who are not familiar with LIME, and its overall usability via an assessment framework, which is derived from the International Organisation for Standardisation 9241-11:1998 standard.
△ Less
Submitted 30 November, 2020;
originally announced December 2020.
