-
Differential Privacy: What is all the noise about?
Authors:
Roxana Danger
Abstract:
Differential Privacy (DP) is a formal definition of privacy that provides rigorous guarantees against risks of privacy breaches during data processing. It makes no assumptions about the knowledge or computational power of adversaries, and provides an interpretable, quantifiable and composable formalism. DP has been actively researched during the last 15 years, but it is still hard to master for ma…
▽ More
Differential Privacy (DP) is a formal definition of privacy that provides rigorous guarantees against risks of privacy breaches during data processing. It makes no assumptions about the knowledge or computational power of adversaries, and provides an interpretable, quantifiable and composable formalism. DP has been actively researched during the last 15 years, but it is still hard to master for many Machine Learning (ML)) practitioners. This paper aims to provide an overview of the most important ideas, concepts and uses of DP in ML, with special focus on its intersection with Federated Learning (FL).
△ Less
Submitted 19 May, 2022;
originally announced May 2022.
-
ProvAbs: model, policy, and tooling for abstracting PROV graphs
Authors:
Paolo Missier,
Jeremy Bryans,
Carl Gamble,
Vasa Curcin,
Roxana Danger
Abstract:
Provenance metadata can be valuable in data sharing settings, where it can be used to help data consumers form judgements regarding the reliability of the data produced by third parties. However, some parts of provenance may be sensitive, requiring access control, or they may need to be simplified for the intended audience. Both these issues can be addressed by a single mechanism for creating abst…
▽ More
Provenance metadata can be valuable in data sharing settings, where it can be used to help data consumers form judgements regarding the reliability of the data produced by third parties. However, some parts of provenance may be sensitive, requiring access control, or they may need to be simplified for the intended audience. Both these issues can be addressed by a single mechanism for creating abstractions over provenance, coupled with a policy model to drive the abstraction. Such mechanism, which we refer to as abstraction by grouping, simultaneously achieves partial disclosure of provenance, and facilitates its consumption. In this paper we introduce a formal foundation for this type of abstraction, grounded in the W3C PROV model; describe the associated policy model; and briefly present its implementation, the Provabs tool for interactive experimentation with policies and abstractions.
△ Less
Submitted 8 June, 2014;
originally announced June 2014.
-
The Management and Integration of Biomedical Knowledge: Application in the Health-e-Child Project (Position Paper)
Authors:
E. Jimenez-Ruiz,
R. Berlanga,
I. Sanz,
R. McClatchey,
R. Danger,
D. Manset,
J. Paraire,
A. Rios
Abstract:
The Health-e-Child project aims to develop an integrated healthcare platform for European paediatrics. In order to achieve a comprehensive view of childrens health, a complex integration of biomedical data, information, and knowledge is necessary. Ontologies will be used to formally define this domain knowledge and will form the basis for the medical knowledge management system. This paper intro…
▽ More
The Health-e-Child project aims to develop an integrated healthcare platform for European paediatrics. In order to achieve a comprehensive view of childrens health, a complex integration of biomedical data, information, and knowledge is necessary. Ontologies will be used to formally define this domain knowledge and will form the basis for the medical knowledge management system. This paper introduces an innovative methodology for the vertical integration of biomedical knowledge. This approach will be largely clinician-centered and will enable the definition of ontology fragments, connections between them (semantic bridges) and enriched ontology fragments (views). The strategy for the specification and capture of fragments, bridges and views is outlined with preliminary examples demonstrated in the collection of biomedical information from hospital databases, biomedical ontologies, and biomedical public databases.
△ Less
Submitted 26 September, 2006;
originally announced September 2006.
