-
arXiv:2206.14560 [pdf, ps, other]
A note on a Code-Based Signature Scheme
Abstract: In this work, we exploit a serious security flaw in a code-based signature scheme from a 2019 work by Liu, Yang, Han and Wang. They adapt the McEliece cryptosystem to obtain a new scheme and, on top of this, they design an efficient digital signature. We show that the new encryption scheme based on McEliece, even if it has longer public keys, is not more secure than the standard one. Moreover, the… ▽ More
Submitted 29 June, 2022; originally announced June 2022.
Comments: 8 pages
-
arXiv:2202.13810 [pdf, ps, other]
A Note on the Hardness of Problems from Cryptographic Group Actions
Abstract: Given a cryptographic group action, we show that the Group Action Inverse Problem (GAIP) and other related problems cannot be NP-hard unless the Polynomial Hierarchy collapses. We show this via random self-reductions and the design of interactive proofs. Since cryptographic group actions are the building block of many security protocols, this result serves both as an upper bound on the worst-case… ▽ More
Submitted 28 February, 2022; originally announced February 2022.
-
arXiv:2112.00429 [pdf, ps, other]
Security issues of CFS-like digital signature algorithms
Abstract: We analyse the security of some variants of the CFS code-based digital signature scheme. We show how the adoption of some code-based hash-functions to improve the efficiency of CFS leads to the ability of an attacker to produce a forgery compatible to the rightful user's public key.
Submitted 1 December, 2021; originally announced December 2021.