Showing 1–7 of 7 results for author: Cyphert, J

A Novel Wideband and Wide Beam High Gain Unidirectional Dipole Antenna for Next Generation WLAN Applications

Authors: Sivadeep R. Kalavakuru, Navid P. Gandji, Jonathan P. Cyphert

Abstract: In this paper, a novel wideband and widebeam unidirectional magneto-electric (ME) dipole antenna for Wi-Fi-7 (5.18-7.125GHz) applications is presented. The element is printed on low-cost substrate and is showing wide-band characteristics with impedance matching over 50% of fractional bandwidth. A tilted ME antenna with a tilted parasitic scatterer is radiating across wide frequency, while meeting… ▽ More In this paper, a novel wideband and widebeam unidirectional magneto-electric (ME) dipole antenna for Wi-Fi-7 (5.18-7.125GHz) applications is presented. The element is printed on low-cost substrate and is showing wide-band characteristics with impedance matching over 50% of fractional bandwidth. A tilted ME antenna with a tilted parasitic scatterer is radiating across wide frequency, while meeting over 100° angular width in both E-plane and H-plane across the wide bandwidth from 5GHz to >8GHz. Adding one parasitic scatterer on each side of dipole, broaden bandwidth of the antenna as well. △ Less

Submitted 2 May, 2024; originally announced May 2024.

Solvable Polynomial Ideals: The Ideal Reflection for Program Analysis

Authors: John Cyphert, Zachary Kincaid

Abstract: This paper presents a program analysis method that generates program summaries involving polynomial arithmetic. Our approach builds on prior techniques that use solvable polynomial maps for summarizing loops. These techniques are able to generate all polynomial invariants for a restricted class of programs, but cannot be applied to programs outside of this class -- for instance, programs with nest… ▽ More This paper presents a program analysis method that generates program summaries involving polynomial arithmetic. Our approach builds on prior techniques that use solvable polynomial maps for summarizing loops. These techniques are able to generate all polynomial invariants for a restricted class of programs, but cannot be applied to programs outside of this class -- for instance, programs with nested loops, conditional branching, unstructured control flow, etc. There currently lacks approaches to apply these prior methods to the case of general programs. This paper bridges that gap. Instead of restricting the kinds of programs we can handle, our method abstracts every loop into a model that can be solved with prior techniques, bringing to bear prior work on solvable polynomial maps to general programs. While no method can generate all polynomial invariants for arbitrary programs, our method establishes its merit through a monotonicty result. We have implemented our techniques, and tested them on a suite of benchmarks from the literature. Our experiments indicate our techniques show promise on challenging verification tasks requiring non-linear reasoning. △ Less

Submitted 6 December, 2023; v1 submitted 7 November, 2023; originally announced November 2023.

Comments: Long version of an article to appear at the 51st ACM SIGPLAN Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages (POPL 2024). This version is a replacement of an earlier long version where typos have been fixed, DOI's have been added to references when able, and a data availability statement has been added

Optimal Symbolic Bound Synthesis

Authors: John Cyphert, Yotam Feldman, Zachary Kincaid, Thomas Reps

Abstract: The problem of finding a constant bound on a term given a set of assumptions has wide applications in optimization as well as program analysis. However, in many contexts the objective term may be unbounded. Still, some sort of symbolic bound may be useful. In this paper we introduce the optimal symbolic-bound synthesis problem, and a technique that tackles this problem for non-linear arithmetic wi… ▽ More The problem of finding a constant bound on a term given a set of assumptions has wide applications in optimization as well as program analysis. However, in many contexts the objective term may be unbounded. Still, some sort of symbolic bound may be useful. In this paper we introduce the optimal symbolic-bound synthesis problem, and a technique that tackles this problem for non-linear arithmetic with function symbols. This allows us to automatically produce symbolic bounds on complex arithmetic expressions from a set of both equality and inequality assumptions. Our solution employs a novel combination of powerful mathematical objects -- Gröbner bases together with polyhedral cones -- to represent an infinite set of implied inequalities. We obtain a sound symbolic bound by reducing the objective term by this infinite set. We implemented our method in a tool, AutoBound, which we tested on problems originating from real Solidity programs. We find that AutoBound yields relevant bounds in each case, matching or nearly-matching upper bounds produced by a human analyst on the same set of programs. △ Less

Submitted 19 October, 2023; originally announced October 2023.

Synthesis with Asymptotic Resource Bounds

Authors: Qinheping Hu, John Cyphert, Loris D'Antoni, Thomas Reps

Abstract: We present a method for synthesizing recursive functions that satisfy both a functional specification and an asymptotic resource bound. Prior methods for synthesis with a resource metric require the user to specify a concrete expression exactly describing resource usage, whereas our method uses big-O notation to specify the asymptotic resource usage. Our method can synthesize programs with complex… ▽ More We present a method for synthesizing recursive functions that satisfy both a functional specification and an asymptotic resource bound. Prior methods for synthesis with a resource metric require the user to specify a concrete expression exactly describing resource usage, whereas our method uses big-O notation to specify the asymptotic resource usage. Our method can synthesize programs with complex resource bounds, such as a sort function that has complexity O(nlog(n)). Our synthesis procedure uses a type system that is able to assign an asymptotic complexity to terms, and can track recurrence relations of functions. These typing rules are justified by theorems used in analysis of algorithms, such as the Master Theorem and the Akra-Bazzi method. We implemented our method as an extension of prior type-based synthesis work. Our tool, SynPlexity, was able to synthesize complex divide-and-conquer programs that cannot be synthesized by prior solvers. △ Less

Submitted 26 May, 2021; v1 submitted 6 March, 2021; originally announced March 2021.

Exact and Approximate Methods for Proving Unrealizability of Syntax-Guided Synthesis Problems

Authors: Qinheping Hu, John Cyphert, Loris D'Antoni, Thomas Reps

Abstract: We consider the problem of automatically establishing that a given syntax-guided-synthesis (SyGuS) problem is unrealizable (i.e., has no solution). We formulate the problem of proving that a SyGuS problem is unrealizable over a finite set of examples as one of solving a set of equations: the solution yields an overapproximation of the set of possible outputs that any term in the search space can p… ▽ More We consider the problem of automatically establishing that a given syntax-guided-synthesis (SyGuS) problem is unrealizable (i.e., has no solution). We formulate the problem of proving that a SyGuS problem is unrealizable over a finite set of examples as one of solving a set of equations: the solution yields an overapproximation of the set of possible outputs that any term in the search space can produce on the given examples. If none of the possible outputs agrees with all of the examples, our technique has proven that the given SyGuS problem is unrealizable. We then present an algorithm for exactly solving the set of equations that result from SyGuS problems over linear integer arithmetic (LIA) and LIA with conditionals (CLIA), thereby showing that LIA and CLIA SyGuS problems over finitely many examples are decidable. We implement the proposed technique and algorithms in a tool called Nay. Nay can prove unrealizability for 70/132 existing SyGuS benchmarks, with running times comparable to those of the state-of-the-art tool Nope. Moreover, Nay can solve 11 benchmarks that Nope cannot solve. △ Less

Submitted 2 April, 2020; originally announced April 2020.

Journal ref: PLDI 2020

Templates and Recurrences: Better Together

Authors: Jason Breck, John Cyphert, Zachary Kincaid, Thomas Reps

Abstract: This paper is the confluence of two streams of ideas in the literature on generating numerical invariants, namely: (1) template-based methods, and (2) recurrence-based methods. A template-based method begins with a template that contains unknown quantities, and finds invariants that match the template by extracting and solving constraints on the unknowns. A disadvantage of template-based methods i… ▽ More This paper is the confluence of two streams of ideas in the literature on generating numerical invariants, namely: (1) template-based methods, and (2) recurrence-based methods. A template-based method begins with a template that contains unknown quantities, and finds invariants that match the template by extracting and solving constraints on the unknowns. A disadvantage of template-based methods is that they require fixing the set of terms that may appear in an invariant in advance. This disadvantage is particularly prominent for non-linear invariant generation, because the user must supply maximum degrees on polynomials, bases for exponents, etc. On the other hand, recurrence-based methods are able to find sophisticated non-linear mathematical relations, including polynomials, exponentials, and logarithms, because such relations arise as the solutions to recurrences. However, a disadvantage of past recurrence-based invariant-generation methods is that they are primarily loop-based analyses: they use recurrences to relate the pre-state and post-state of a loop, so it is not obvious how to apply them to a recursive procedure, especially if the procedure is non-linearly recursive (e.g., a tree-traversal algorithm). In this paper, we combine these two approaches and obtain a technique that uses templates in which the unknowns are functions rather than numbers, and the constraints on the unknowns are recurrences. The technique synthesizes invariants involving polynomials, exponentials, and logarithms, even in the presence of arbitrary control-flow, including any combination of loops, branches, and (possibly non-linear) recursion. For instance, it is able to show that (i) the time taken by merge-sort is $O(n \log(n))$, and (ii) the time taken by Strassen's algorithm is $O(n^{\log_2(7)})$. △ Less

Submitted 30 March, 2020; originally announced March 2020.

Comments: 20 pages, 3 figures

Proving Unrealizability for Syntax-Guided Synthesis

Authors: Qinheping Hu, Jason Breck, John Cyphert, Loris D'Antoni, Thomas Reps

Abstract: Proving Unrealizability for Syntax-Guided Synthesis We consider the problem of automatically establishing that a given syntax-guided-synthesis (SyGuS) problem is unrealizable (i.e., has no solution). Existing techniques have quite limited ability to establish unrealizability for general SyGuS instances in which the grammar describing the search space contains infinitely many programs. By encodin… ▽ More Proving Unrealizability for Syntax-Guided Synthesis We consider the problem of automatically establishing that a given syntax-guided-synthesis (SyGuS) problem is unrealizable (i.e., has no solution). Existing techniques have quite limited ability to establish unrealizability for general SyGuS instances in which the grammar describing the search space contains infinitely many programs. By encoding the synthesis problem's grammar G as a nondeterministic program P_G, we reduce the unrealizability problem to a reachability problem such that, if a standard program-analysis tool can establish that a certain assertion in P_G always holds, then the synthesis problem is unrealizable. Our method can be used to augment any existing SyGus tool so that it can establish that a successfully synthesized program q is optimal with respect to some syntactic cost -- e.g., q has the fewest possible if-then-else operators. Using known techniques, grammar G can be automatically transformed to generate exactly all programs with lower cost than q -- e.g., fewer conditional expressions. Our algorithm can then be applied to show that the resulting synthesis problem is unrealizable. We implemented the proposed technique in a tool called NOPE. NOPE can prove unrealizability for 59/134 variants of existing linear-integer-arithmetic SyGus benchmarks, whereas all existing SyGus solvers lack the ability to prove that these benchmarks are unrealizable, and time out on them. △ Less

Submitted 23 July, 2019; v1 submitted 14 May, 2019; originally announced May 2019.