Showing 1–12 of 12 results for author: Courcoubetis, C

On the Effect of Time Preferences on the Price of Anarchy

Authors: Yunpeng Li, Antonis Dimakis, Costas A. Courcoubetis

Abstract: This paper examines the impact of agents' myopic optimization on the efficiency of systems comprised by many selfish agents. In contrast to standard congestion games where agents interact in a one-shot fashion, in our model each agent chooses an infinite sequence of actions and maximizes the total reward stream discounted over time under different ways of computing present values. Our model assume… ▽ More This paper examines the impact of agents' myopic optimization on the efficiency of systems comprised by many selfish agents. In contrast to standard congestion games where agents interact in a one-shot fashion, in our model each agent chooses an infinite sequence of actions and maximizes the total reward stream discounted over time under different ways of computing present values. Our model assumes that actions consume common resources that get congested, and the action choice by an agent affects the completion times of actions chosen by other agents, which in turn affects the time rewards are accrued and their discounted value. This is a mean-field game, where an agent's reward depends on the decisions of the other agents through the resulting action completion times. For this type of game we define stationary equilibria, and analyze their existence and price of anarchy (PoA). Overall, we find that the PoA depends entirely on the type of discounting rather than its specific parameters. For exponential discounting, myopic behaviour leads to extreme inefficiency: the PoA is infinity for any value of the discount parameter. For power law discounting, such inefficiency is greatly reduced and the PoA is 2 whenever stationary equilibria exist. This matches the PoA when there is no discounting and players maximize long-run average rewards. Additionally, we observe that exponential discounting may introduce unstable equilibria in learning algorithms, if action completion times are interdependent. In contrast, under no discounting all equilibria are stable. △ Less

Submitted 29 April, 2025; originally announced April 2025.

Repositioning, Ride-matching, and Abandonment in On-demand Ride-hailing Platforms: A Mean Field Game Approach

Authors: Yunpeng Li, Antonis Dimakis, Costas A. Courcoubetis

Abstract: The on-demand ride-hailing industry has experienced rapid growth, transforming transportation norms worldwide. Despite improvements in efficiency over traditional taxi services, significant challenges remain, including drivers' strategic repositioning behavior, customer abandonment, and inefficiencies in dispatch algorithms. To address these issues, we introduce a comprehensive mean field game mod… ▽ More The on-demand ride-hailing industry has experienced rapid growth, transforming transportation norms worldwide. Despite improvements in efficiency over traditional taxi services, significant challenges remain, including drivers' strategic repositioning behavior, customer abandonment, and inefficiencies in dispatch algorithms. To address these issues, we introduce a comprehensive mean field game model that systematically analyzes the dynamics of ride-hailing platforms by incorporating driver repositioning across multiple regions, customer abandonment behavior, and platform dispatch algorithms. Using this framework, we identify all possible mean field equilibria as the Karush-Kuhn-Tucker (KKT) points of an associated optimization problem. Our analysis reveals the emergence of multiple equilibria, including the inefficient "Wild Goose Chase" one, characterized by drivers pursuing distant requests, leading to suboptimal system performance. To mitigate these inefficiencies, we propose a novel two-matching-radius nearest-neighbor dispatch algorithm that eliminates undesirable equilibria and ensures a unique mean field equilibrium for multi-region systems. The algorithm dynamically adjusts matching radii based on driver supply rates, optimizing pick-up times and waiting times for drivers while maximizing request completion rates. Numerical experiments and simulation results show that our proposed algorithm reduces customer abandonment, minimizes waiting times for both customers and drivers, and improves overall platform efficiency. △ Less

Submitted 9 May, 2025; v1 submitted 3 April, 2025; originally announced April 2025.

The Impact of Autonomous Vehicles on Ride-Hailing Platforms with Strategic Human Drivers

Authors: Shuqin Gao, Xinyuan Wu, Antonis Dimakis, Costas Courcoubetis

Abstract: Motivated by the rapid development of autonomous vehicle technology, this work focuses on the challenges of introducing them in ride-hailing platforms with conventional strategic human drivers. We consider a ride-hailing platform that operates a mixed fleet of autonomous vehicles (AVs) and conventional vehicles (CVs), where AVs are fully controlled by the platform and CVs are operated by self-inte… ▽ More Motivated by the rapid development of autonomous vehicle technology, this work focuses on the challenges of introducing them in ride-hailing platforms with conventional strategic human drivers. We consider a ride-hailing platform that operates a mixed fleet of autonomous vehicles (AVs) and conventional vehicles (CVs), where AVs are fully controlled by the platform and CVs are operated by self-interested human drivers. Each vehicle is modelled as a Markov Decision Process that maximizes long-run average reward by choosing its repositioning actions. The behavior of the CVs corresponds to a large game where agents interact through resource constraints that result in queuing delays. In our fluid model, drivers may wait in queues in the different regions when the supply of drivers tends to exceed the service demand by customers. Our primary objective is to optimize the mixed AV-CV system so that the total profit of the platform generated by AVs and CVs is maximized. To achieve that, we formulate this problem as a bi-level optimization problem OPT where the platform moves first by controlling the actions of the AVs and the demand revealed to CVs, and then the CVs react to the revealed demand by forming an equilibrium that can be characterized by the solution of a convex optimization problem. We prove several interesting structural properties of the optimal solution and analyze simple heuristics such as AV-first where we solve for the optimal dispatch of AVs without taking into account the subsequent reaction of the CVs. We propose three numerical algorithms to solve OPT which is a non-convex problem in the platform decision parameters. We evaluate their performance and use them to show some interesting trends in the optimal AV-CV fleet dimensioning when supply is exogenous and endogenous. △ Less

Submitted 27 June, 2024; originally announced June 2024.

Comments: This is a working paper. 60 pages

Average-Case Analysis of Greedy Matching for Large-Scale D2D Resource Sharing

Authors: Shuqin Gao, Costas A. Courcoubetis, Lingjie Duan

Abstract: Given the proximity of many wireless users and their diversity in consuming local resources (e.g., data-plans, computation and energy resources), device-to-device (D2D) resource sharing is a promising approach towards realizing a sharing economy. This paper adopts an easy-to-implement greedy matching algorithm with distributed fashion and only sub-linear O(log n) parallel complexity (in user numbe… ▽ More Given the proximity of many wireless users and their diversity in consuming local resources (e.g., data-plans, computation and energy resources), device-to-device (D2D) resource sharing is a promising approach towards realizing a sharing economy. This paper adopts an easy-to-implement greedy matching algorithm with distributed fashion and only sub-linear O(log n) parallel complexity (in user number n) for large-scale D2D sharing. Practical cases indicate that the greedy matching's average performance is far better than the worst-case approximation ratio 50% as compared to the optimum. However, there is no rigorous average-case analysis in the literature to back up such encouraging findings and this paper is the first to present such analysis for multiple representative classes of graphs. For 1D linear networks, we prove that our greedy algorithm performs better than 86.5% of the optimum. For 2D grids, though dynamic programming cannot be directly applied, we still prove this average performance ratio to be above 76%. For the more challenging Erdos-Renyi random graphs, we equivalently reduce to the asymptotic analysis of random trees and successfully prove a ratio up to 79%. Finally, we conduct experiments using real data to simulate realistic D2D networks, and show that our analytical performance measure approximates well practical cases. △ Less

Submitted 22 May, 2023; originally announced May 2023.

Comments: Accepted by IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing. arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:2107.12581

Average-Case Analysis of Greedy Matching for D2D Resource Sharing

Authors: Shuqin Gao, Costas Courcoubetis, Lingjie Duan

Abstract: Given the proximity of many wireless users and their diversity in consuming local resources (e.g., data-plans, computation and even energy resources), device-to-device (D2D) resource sharing is a promising approach towards realizing a sharing economy. In the resulting networked economy, $n$ users segment themselves into sellers and buyers that need to be efficiently matched locally. This paper ado… ▽ More Given the proximity of many wireless users and their diversity in consuming local resources (e.g., data-plans, computation and even energy resources), device-to-device (D2D) resource sharing is a promising approach towards realizing a sharing economy. In the resulting networked economy, $n$ users segment themselves into sellers and buyers that need to be efficiently matched locally. This paper adopts an easy-to-implement greedy matching algorithm with distributed fashion and only sub-linear $O(\log n)$ parallel complexity, which offers a great advantage compared to the optimal but computational-expensive centralized matching. But is it efficient compared to the optimal matching? Extensive simulations indicate that in a large number of practical cases the average loss is no more than $10\%$, a far better result than the $50\%$ loss bound in the worst case. However, there is no rigorous average-case analysis in the literature to back up such encouraging findings, which is a fundamental step towards supporting the practical use of greedy matching in D2D sharing. This paper is the first to present the rigorous average analysis of certain representative classes of graphs with random parameters, by proposing a new asymptotic methodology. For typical 2D grids with random matching weights we rigorously prove that our greedy algorithm performs better than $84.9\%$ of the optimal, while for typical Erdos-Renyi random graphs we prove a lower bound of $79\%$ when the graph is neither dense nor sparse. Finally, we use realistic data to show that our random graph models approximate well D2D sharing networks encountered in practice. △ Less

Submitted 30 July, 2021; v1 submitted 27 July, 2021; originally announced July 2021.

Comments: 12 pages, 6 figures, conference

Catastrophe by Design in Population Games: Destabilizing Wasteful Locked-in Technologies

Authors: Stefanos Leonardos, Iosif Sakos, Costas Courcoubetis, Georgios Piliouras

Abstract: In multi-agent environments in which coordination is desirable, the history of play often causes lock-in at sub-optimal outcomes. Notoriously, technologies with a significant environmental footprint or high social cost persist despite the successful development of more environmentally friendly and/or socially efficient alternatives. The displacement of the status quo is hindered by entrenched econ… ▽ More In multi-agent environments in which coordination is desirable, the history of play often causes lock-in at sub-optimal outcomes. Notoriously, technologies with a significant environmental footprint or high social cost persist despite the successful development of more environmentally friendly and/or socially efficient alternatives. The displacement of the status quo is hindered by entrenched economic interests and network effects. To exacerbate matters, the standard mechanism design approaches based on centralized authorities with the capacity to use preferential subsidies to effectively dictate system outcomes are not always applicable to modern decentralized economies. What other types of mechanisms are feasible? In this paper, we develop and analyze a mechanism that induces transitions from inefficient lock-ins to superior alternatives. This mechanism does not exogenously favor one option over another -- instead, the phase transition emerges endogenously via a standard evolutionary learning model, Q-learning, where agents trade-off exploration and exploitation. Exerting the same transient influence to both the efficient and inefficient technologies encourages exploration and results in irreversible phase transitions and permanent stabilization of the efficient one. On a technical level, our work is based on bifurcation and catastrophe theory, a branch of mathematics that deals with changes in the number and stability properties of equilibria. Critically, our analysis is shown to be structurally robust to significant and even adversarially chosen perturbations to the parameters of both our game and our behavioral model. △ Less

Submitted 25 July, 2020; originally announced July 2020.

MSC Class: 91A26; 91A68; 91A80; 37N40; 58K35 ACM Class: G.3

Distributed Double Auctions for Large-Scale Device-to-Device Resource Trading

Authors: Shuqin Gao, Costas Courcoubetis, Lingjie Duan

Abstract: Mobile users in future wireless networks face limited wireless resources such as data plan, computation capacity and energy storage. Given that some of these users may not be utilizing fully their wireless resources, device-to-device (D2D) resource sharing is a promising approach to exploit users' diversity in resource use and for pooling their resources locally. In this paper, we propose a novel… ▽ More Mobile users in future wireless networks face limited wireless resources such as data plan, computation capacity and energy storage. Given that some of these users may not be utilizing fully their wireless resources, device-to-device (D2D) resource sharing is a promising approach to exploit users' diversity in resource use and for pooling their resources locally. In this paper, we propose a novel two-sided D2D trading market model that enables a large number of locally connected users to trade resources. Traditional resource allocation solutions are mostly centralized without considering users' local D2D connectivity constraints, becoming unscalable for large-scale trading. In addition, there may be market failure since selfish users will not truthfully report their actual valuations and quantities for buying or selling resources. To address these two key challenges, we first investigate the distributed resource allocation problem with D2D assignment constraints. Based on the greedy idea of maximum weighted matching, we propose a fast algorithm to achieve near-optimal average allocative efficiency. Then, we combine it with a new pricing mechanism that adjusts the final trading prices for buying and selling resources in a way that buyers and sellers are incentivized to truthfully report their valuations and available resource quantities. Unlike traditional double auctions with a central controller, this pricing mechanism is fully distributed in the sense that the final trading prices between each matched pair of users only depend on their own declarations and hence can be calculated locally. Finally, we analyze the repeated execution of the proposed D2D trading mechanism in multiple rounds and determine the best trading frequency. △ Less

Submitted 30 July, 2020; v1 submitted 20 July, 2020; originally announced July 2020.

Comments: 12 pages, 5 figures, conference

Closed Non-atomic Resource Allocation Games

Authors: Costas Courcoubetis, Antonis Dimakis

Abstract: How is efficiency affected when demand excesses over supply are signalled through waiting in queues? We consider a class of congestion games with a nonatomic set of players of a constant mass, based on a formulation of generic linear programs as sequential resource allocation games. Players continuously select activities such that they maximize linear objectives interpreted as time-average of acti… ▽ More How is efficiency affected when demand excesses over supply are signalled through waiting in queues? We consider a class of congestion games with a nonatomic set of players of a constant mass, based on a formulation of generic linear programs as sequential resource allocation games. Players continuously select activities such that they maximize linear objectives interpreted as time-average of activity rewards, while active resource constraints cause queueing. In turn, the resulting waiting delays enter in the optimization problem of each player. The existence of Wardrop-type equilibria and their properties are investivated by means of a potential function related to proportional fairness. The inefficiency of the equilibria relative to optimal resource allocation is characterized through the price of anarchy which is 2 if all players are of the same type ($\infty$ if not). △ Less

Submitted 17 November, 2020; v1 submitted 16 July, 2020; originally announced July 2020.

Recommending Paths: Follow or Not Follow?

Authors: Yunpeng Li, Costas Courcoubetis, Lingjie Duan

Abstract: Mobile social network applications constitute an important platform for traffic information sharing, helping users collect and share sensor information about the driving conditions they experience on the traveled path in real time. In this paper we analyse the simple but fundamental model of a platform choosing between two paths: one with known deterministic travel cost and the other that alternat… ▽ More Mobile social network applications constitute an important platform for traffic information sharing, helping users collect and share sensor information about the driving conditions they experience on the traveled path in real time. In this paper we analyse the simple but fundamental model of a platform choosing between two paths: one with known deterministic travel cost and the other that alternates over time between a low and a high random cost states, where the low and the high cost states are only partially observable and perform respectively better and worse on average than the fixed cost path. The more users are routed over the stochastic path, the better the platform can infer its actual state and use it efficiently. At the Nash equilibrium, if asked to take the riskier path, in many cases selfish users will myopically disregard the optimal path suggestions of the platform, leading to a suboptimal system without enough exploration on the stochastic path. We prove the interesting result that if the past collected information is hidden from users, the system becomes incentive compatible and even `sophisticated' users (in the sense that they have full capability to reverse-engineer the platform's recommendation and derive the path state distribution conditional on the recommendation) prefer to follow the platform's recommendations. In a more practical setting where the platform implements a model-free Q-learning algorithm to minimise the social travel cost, our analysis suggests that increasing the accuracy of the learning algorithm increases the range of system parameters for which sophisticated users follow ! the recommendations of the platform, becoming in the limit fully incentive compatible. Finally, we extend the two-path model to include more stochastic paths, and show that incentive compatibility holds under our information restriction mechanism. △ Less

Submitted 3 December, 2018; originally announced December 2018.

Optimal pricing for peer-to-peer sharing with network externalities

Authors: Yunpeng Li, Costas Courcoubetis, Lingjie Duan, Richard Weber

Abstract: In this paper, we analyse how a peer-to-peer sharing platform should price its service (when imagined as an excludable public good) to maximize profit, when each user's participation adds value to the platform service by creating a positive externality to other participants. To characterize network externalities as a function of the number of participants, we consider different bounded and unbound… ▽ More In this paper, we analyse how a peer-to-peer sharing platform should price its service (when imagined as an excludable public good) to maximize profit, when each user's participation adds value to the platform service by creating a positive externality to other participants. To characterize network externalities as a function of the number of participants, we consider different bounded and unbounded user utility models. The bounded utility model fits many infrastructure sharing applications with bounded network value, in which complete coverage has a finite user valuation (e.g., WiFi or hotspot). The unbounded utility model fits the large scale data sharing and explosion in social media, where it is expected that the network value follows Metcalfe's or Zipf's law. For both models, we analyze the optimal pricing schemes to select heterogeneous users in the platform under complete and incomplete information of users' service valuations. We propose the concept of price of information (PoI) to characterize the profit loss due to lack of information, and present provable PoI bounds for different utility models. We show that the PoI=2 for the bounded utility model, meaning that just half of profit is lost, whereas the PoI>=2 for the unbounded utility model and increases as for a less concave utility function. We also show that the complicated differentiated pricing scheme which is optimal under incomplete user information, can be replaced by a single uniform price scheme that is asymptotic optimal. Finally, we extend our pricing schemes to a two-sided market by including a new group of `pure' service users contributing no externalities, and show that the platform may charge zero price to the original group of users in order to attract the pure user group. △ Less

Submitted 28 September, 2020; v1 submitted 24 May, 2018; originally announced May 2018.

Dynamic routing for social information sharing

Authors: Yunpeng Li, Costas Courcoubetis, Lingjie Duan

Abstract: Today mobile users are intensively interconnected thanks to the emerging mobile social networks, where they share location-based information with each other when traveling on different routes and visit different areas of the city. In our model the information collected is aggregated over all users' trips and made publicly available as a public good. Due to information overlap, the total useful con… ▽ More Today mobile users are intensively interconnected thanks to the emerging mobile social networks, where they share location-based information with each other when traveling on different routes and visit different areas of the city. In our model the information collected is aggregated over all users' trips and made publicly available as a public good. Due to information overlap, the total useful content amount increases with the diversity in path choices made by the users, and it is crucial to motivate selfish users to choose different paths despite the potentially higher costs associated with their trips. In this paper we combine the benefits from social information sharing with the fundamental routing problem where a unit mass of non-atomic selfish users decide their trips in a non-cooperative game by choosing between a high-cost and a low-cost path. To remedy the inefficient low-content equilibrium where all users choose to explore a single path (the low-cost path), we propose and analyse two new incentive mechanisms that can be used by the social network application, one based on side payments and the other on restricting access to content for users that choose the low cost path. We also obtain interesting price of anarchy results that show some fundamental tradeoffs between achieving path diversity and maintaining greater user participation, motivating a combined mechanism to further increase the social welfare. Our model extends classical dynamic routing in the case of externalities caused from traffic on different paths of the network. △ Less

Submitted 11 August, 2016; originally announced August 2016.

From advertising profits to bandwidth prices-A quantitative methodology for negotiating premium peering

Authors: Laszlo Gyarmati, Nikolaos Laoutaris, Kostas Sdrolias, Pablo Rodriguez, Costas Courcoubetis

Abstract: We have developed a first of its kind methodology for deriving bandwidth prices for premium direct peering between Access ISPs (A-ISPs) and Content and Service Providers (CSPs) that want to deliver content and services in premium quality. Our methodology establishes a direct link between service profitability, e.g., from advertising, user- and subscriber-loyalty, interconnection costs, and finally… ▽ More We have developed a first of its kind methodology for deriving bandwidth prices for premium direct peering between Access ISPs (A-ISPs) and Content and Service Providers (CSPs) that want to deliver content and services in premium quality. Our methodology establishes a direct link between service profitability, e.g., from advertising, user- and subscriber-loyalty, interconnection costs, and finally bandwidth price for peering. Unlike existing work in both the networking and economics literature, our resulting computational model built around Nash bargaining, can be used for deriving quantitative results comparable to actual market prices. We analyze the US market and derive prices for video that compare favorably with existing prices for transit and paid peering. We also observe that the fair prices returned by the model for high-profit/low-volume services such as search, are orders of magnitude higher than current bandwidth prices. This implies that resolving existing (fierce) interconnection tussles may require per service, instead of wholesale, peering between A-ISPs and CSPs. Our model can be used for deriving initial benchmark prices for such negotiations. △ Less

Submitted 7 January, 2015; v1 submitted 16 April, 2014; originally announced April 2014.

Comments: 16 pages, 8 figures