Showing 1–3 of 3 results for author: Cochran, A

Cited Half-Life of the Journal Literature

Authors: Philip M. Davis, Angela Cochran

Abstract: Analyzing 13,455 journals listed in the Journal Citation Report (Thomson Reuters) from 1997 through 2013, we report that the mean cited half-life of the scholarly literature is 6.5 years and growing at a rate of 0.13 years per annum. Focusing on a subset of journals (N=4,937) for which we have a continuous series of half-life observations, 209 of 229 (91%) subject categories experienced increasing… ▽ More Analyzing 13,455 journals listed in the Journal Citation Report (Thomson Reuters) from 1997 through 2013, we report that the mean cited half-life of the scholarly literature is 6.5 years and growing at a rate of 0.13 years per annum. Focusing on a subset of journals (N=4,937) for which we have a continuous series of half-life observations, 209 of 229 (91%) subject categories experienced increasing cited half-lives. Contrary to the overall trend, engineering and chemistry journals experienced declining cited half-lives. Last, as journals attracted more citations, a larger proportion of them were directed toward older papers. The trend to cite older papers is not fully explained by technology (digital publishing, search and retrieval, etc.), but may be the result of a structural shift to fund incremental and applied research over fundamental science. △ Less

Submitted 29 April, 2015; v1 submitted 28 April, 2015; originally announced April 2015.

Comments: Table 1 is replaced to fix a sorting error

An Online Environment for Democratic Deliberation: Motivations, Principles, and Design

Authors: Todd Davies, Brendan O'Connor, Alex Cochran, Jonathan J. Effrat, Andrew Parker, Benjamin Newman, Aaron Tam

Abstract: We have created a platform for online deliberation called Deme (which rhymes with 'team'). Deme is designed to allow groups of people to engage in collaborative drafting, focused discussion, and decision making using the Internet. The Deme project has evolved greatly from its beginning in 2003. This chapter outlines the thinking behind Deme's initial design: our motivations for creating it, the pr… ▽ More We have created a platform for online deliberation called Deme (which rhymes with 'team'). Deme is designed to allow groups of people to engage in collaborative drafting, focused discussion, and decision making using the Internet. The Deme project has evolved greatly from its beginning in 2003. This chapter outlines the thinking behind Deme's initial design: our motivations for creating it, the principles that guided its construction, and its most important design features. The version of Deme described here was written in PHP and was deployed in 2004 and used by several groups (including organizers of the 2005 Online Deliberation Conference). Other papers describe later developments in the Deme project (see Davies et al. 2005, 2008; Davies and Mintz 2009). △ Less

Submitted 15 February, 2013; originally announced February 2013.

Comments: Appeared in Todd Davies and Seeta Peña Gangadharan (Editors), Online Deliberation: Design, Research, and Practice, CSLI Publications/University of Chicago Press, October 2009, pp. 275-292; 18 pages, 3 figures

ACM Class: H.5.3; K.4.1; K.4.3

"Groupware for Groups": Problem-Driven Design in Deme

Authors: Todd Davies, Brendan O'Connor, Alex Cochran, Andrew Parker

Abstract: Design choices can be clarified when group interaction software is directed at solving the interaction needs of particular groups that pre-date the groupware. We describe an example: the Deme platform for online deliberation. Traditional threaded conversation systems are insufficient for solving the problem at which Deme is aimed, namely, that the democratic process in grassroots community groups… ▽ More Design choices can be clarified when group interaction software is directed at solving the interaction needs of particular groups that pre-date the groupware. We describe an example: the Deme platform for online deliberation. Traditional threaded conversation systems are insufficient for solving the problem at which Deme is aimed, namely, that the democratic process in grassroots community groups is undermined both by the limited availability of group members for face-to-face meetings and by constraints on the use of information in real-time interactions. We describe and motivate design elements, either implemented or planned for Deme, that addresses this problem. We believe that "problem focused" design of software for preexisting groups provides a useful framework for evaluating the appropriateness of design elements in groupware generally. △ Less

Submitted 13 February, 2013; originally announced February 2013.

Comments: Position paper from the Beyond Threaded Conversation Workshop at CHI 2005, Portland, Oregon, April 3, 2005; 3 pages, 2 figures

ACM Class: H.4.1; H.5.3; I.5.2; H.5.2