Showing 1–2 of 2 results for author: Cobo, M L

Dealing with Qualitative and Quantitative Features in Legal Domains

Authors: Maximiliano C. D. Budán, María Laura Cobo, Diego I. Martínez, Antonino Rotolo

Abstract: In this work, we enrich a formalism for argumentation by including a formal characterization of features related to the knowledge, in order to capture proper reasoning in legal domains. We add meta-data information to the arguments in the form of labels representing quantitative and qualitative data about them. These labels are propagated through an argumentative graph according to the relations o… ▽ More In this work, we enrich a formalism for argumentation by including a formal characterization of features related to the knowledge, in order to capture proper reasoning in legal domains. We add meta-data information to the arguments in the form of labels representing quantitative and qualitative data about them. These labels are propagated through an argumentative graph according to the relations of support, conflict, and aggregation between arguments. △ Less

Submitted 5 March, 2019; originally announced March 2019.

Comments: arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1903.01865

Journal ref: International Conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems - 2018

Bipolar in Temporal Argumentation Framework

Authors: Maximiliano C. D. Budán, Maria Laura Cobo, Diego C. Martinez, Guillermo R. Simari

Abstract: A Timed Argumentation Framework (TAF) is a formalism where arguments are only valid for consideration in a given period of time, called availability intervals, which are defined for every individual argument. The original proposal is based on a single, abstract notion of attack between arguments that remains static and permanent in time. Thus, in general, when identifying the set of acceptable arg… ▽ More A Timed Argumentation Framework (TAF) is a formalism where arguments are only valid for consideration in a given period of time, called availability intervals, which are defined for every individual argument. The original proposal is based on a single, abstract notion of attack between arguments that remains static and permanent in time. Thus, in general, when identifying the set of acceptable arguments, the outcome associated with a TAF will vary over time. In this work we introduce an extension of TAF adding the capability of modeling a support relation between arguments. In this sense, the resulting framework provides a suitable model for different time-dependent issues. Thus, the main contribution here is to provide an enhanced framework for modeling a positive (support) and negative (attack) interaction varying over time, which are relevant in many real-world situations. This leads to a Timed Bipolar Argumentation Framework (T-BAF), where classical argument extensions can be defined. The proposal aims at advancing in the integration of temporal argumentation in different application domain. △ Less

Submitted 5 March, 2019; originally announced March 2019.

Journal ref: Internation Journal of Approximate Reassoning - 2017