Showing 1–3 of 3 results for author: Cleland, G

A Transformer-based survival model for prediction of all-cause mortality in heart failure patients: a multi-cohort study

Authors: Shishir Rao, Nouman Ahmed, Gholamreza Salimi-Khorshidi, Christopher Yau, Huimin Su, Nathalie Conrad, Folkert W Asselbergs, Mark Woodward, Rod Jackson, John GF Cleland, Kazem Rahimi

Abstract: We developed and validated TRisk, a Transformer-based AI model predicting 36-month mortality in heart failure patients by analysing temporal patient journeys from UK electronic health records (EHR). Our study included 403,534 heart failure patients (ages 40-90) from 1,418 English general practices, with 1,063 practices for model derivation and 355 for external validation. TRisk was compared agains… ▽ More We developed and validated TRisk, a Transformer-based AI model predicting 36-month mortality in heart failure patients by analysing temporal patient journeys from UK electronic health records (EHR). Our study included 403,534 heart failure patients (ages 40-90) from 1,418 English general practices, with 1,063 practices for model derivation and 355 for external validation. TRisk was compared against the MAGGIC-EHR model across various patient subgroups. With median follow-up of 9 months, TRisk achieved a concordance index of 0.845 (95% confidence interval: [0.841, 0.849]), significantly outperforming MAGGIC-EHR's 0.728 (0.723, 0.733) for predicting 36-month all-cause mortality. TRisk showed more consistent performance across sex, age, and baseline characteristics, suggesting less bias. We successfully adapted TRisk to US hospital data through transfer learning, achieving a C-index of 0.802 (0.789, 0.816) with 21,767 patients. Explainability analyses revealed TRisk captured established risk factors while identifying underappreciated predictors like cancers and hepatic failure that were important across both cohorts. Notably, cancers maintained strong prognostic value even a decade after diagnosis. TRisk demonstrated well-calibrated mortality prediction across both healthcare systems. Our findings highlight the value of tracking longitudinal health profiles and revealed risk factors not included in previous expert-driven models. △ Less

Submitted 15 March, 2025; originally announced March 2025.

Consensus of state of the art mortality prediction models: From all-cause mortality to sudden death prediction

Authors: Yola Jones, Fani Deligianni, Jeff Dalton, Pierpaolo Pellicori, John G F Cleland

Abstract: Worldwide, many millions of people die suddenly and unexpectedly each year, either with or without a prior history of cardiovascular disease. Such events are sparse (once in a lifetime), many victims will not have had prior investigations for cardiac disease and many different definitions of sudden death exist. Accordingly, sudden death is hard to predict. This analysis used NHS Electronic Healt… ▽ More Worldwide, many millions of people die suddenly and unexpectedly each year, either with or without a prior history of cardiovascular disease. Such events are sparse (once in a lifetime), many victims will not have had prior investigations for cardiac disease and many different definitions of sudden death exist. Accordingly, sudden death is hard to predict. This analysis used NHS Electronic Health Records (EHRs) for people aged $\geq$50 years living in the Greater Glasgow and Clyde (GG\&C) region in 2010 (n = 380,000) to try to overcome these challenges. We investigated whether medical history, blood tests, prescription of medicines, and hospitalisations might, in combination, predict a heightened risk of sudden death. We compared the performance of models trained to predict either sudden death or all-cause mortality. We built six models for each outcome of interest: three taken from state-of-the-art research (BEHRT, Deepr and Deep Patient), and three of our own creation. We trained these using two different data representations: a language-based representation, and a sparse temporal matrix. We used global interpretability to understand the most important features of each model, and compare how much agreement there was amongst models using Rank Biased Overlap. It is challenging to account for correlated variables without increasing the complexity of the interpretability technique. We overcame this by clustering features into groups and comparing the most important groups for each model. We found the agreement between models to be much higher when accounting for correlated variables. Our analysis emphasises the challenge of predicting sudden death and emphasises the need for better understanding and interpretation of machine learning models applied to healthcare applications. △ Less

Submitted 30 August, 2023; originally announced August 2023.

FedComm: Understanding Communication Protocols for Edge-based Federated Learning

Authors: Gary Cleland, Di Wu, Rehmat Ullah, Blesson Varghese

Abstract: Federated learning (FL) trains machine learning (ML) models on devices using locally generated data and exchanges models without transferring raw data to a distant server. This exchange incurs a communication overhead and impacts the performance of FL training. There is limited understanding of how communication protocols specifically contribute to the performance of FL. Such an understanding is e… ▽ More Federated learning (FL) trains machine learning (ML) models on devices using locally generated data and exchanges models without transferring raw data to a distant server. This exchange incurs a communication overhead and impacts the performance of FL training. There is limited understanding of how communication protocols specifically contribute to the performance of FL. Such an understanding is essential for selecting the right communication protocol when designing an FL system. This paper presents FedComm, a benchmarking methodology to quantify the impact of optimized application layer protocols, namely Message Queue Telemetry Transport (MQTT), Advanced Message Queuing Protocol (AMQP), and ZeroMQ Message Transport Protocol (ZMTP), and non-optimized application layer protocols, namely as TCP and UDP, on the performance of FL. FedComm measures the overall performance of FL in terms of communication time and accuracy under varying computational and network stress and packet loss rates. Experiments on a lab-based testbed demonstrate that TCP outperforms UDP as a non-optimized application layer protocol with higher accuracy and shorter communication times for 4G and Wi-Fi networks. Optimized application layer protocols such as AMQP, MQTT, and ZMTP outperformed non-optimized application layer protocols in most network conditions, resulting in a 2.5x reduction in communication time compared to TCP while maintaining accuracy. The experimental results enable us to highlight a number of open research issues for further investigation. FedComm is available for download from https://github.com/qub-blesson/FedComm. △ Less

Submitted 18 August, 2022; originally announced August 2022.