Large-Scale Experiment on the Importance of Social Learning and Unimodality in the Wisdom of the Crowd
Authors:
Dhaval Adjodah,
Shi Kai Chong,
Yan Leng,
Peter Krafft,
Alex Pentland
Abstract:
In this study, we build on previous research to understand the conditions within which the Wisdom of the Crowd (WoC) improves or worsens as a result of showing individuals the predictions of their peers. Our main novel contributions are: 1) a dataset of unprecedented size and detail; 2) we observe the novel effect of the importance of the unimodality of the social information shown to individuals:…
▽ More
In this study, we build on previous research to understand the conditions within which the Wisdom of the Crowd (WoC) improves or worsens as a result of showing individuals the predictions of their peers. Our main novel contributions are: 1) a dataset of unprecedented size and detail; 2) we observe the novel effect of the importance of the unimodality of the social information shown to individuals: if one does not see only one clear peak in the distribution of the crowd's predictions, the WoC is worsened after social exposure; and 3) we estimate social learning weights that we use to show that there exists individuals who are much better at learning from the crowd and can be filtered to improve collective accuracy.
△ Less
Submitted 29 December, 2017;
originally announced December 2017.
Social Bayesian Learning in the Wisdom of the Crowd
Authors:
Dhaval Adjodah,
Yan Leng,
Shi Kai Chong,
Peter Krafft,
Alex Pentland
Abstract:
Being able to correctly aggregate the beliefs of many people into a single belief is a problem fundamental to many important social, economic and political processes such as policy making, market pricing and voting. Although there exist many models and mechanisms for aggregation, there is a lack of methods and literature regarding the aggregation of opinions when influence and learning between ind…
▽ More
Being able to correctly aggregate the beliefs of many people into a single belief is a problem fundamental to many important social, economic and political processes such as policy making, market pricing and voting. Although there exist many models and mechanisms for aggregation, there is a lack of methods and literature regarding the aggregation of opinions when influence and learning between individuals exist. This is in part because there are not many models of how people update their belief when exposed to the beliefs of others, and so it is hard to quantify the dependencies between people's mental models which is essential to minimizing redundancies in the aggregation. In this paper, we explore many models of how users influence and learn from each other, and we benchmark our models against the well-known DeGroot model. Our main contributions are: 1) we collect a new dataset of unprecedented size and detail to be posted online; 2) we develop a new Social Bayesian model of how people update their mental models, 3) we compare of our model to other well-known social learning models. Specifically, we show that our new Social Bayesian model is superior to the other models tested.
△ Less
Submitted 28 December, 2017;
originally announced December 2017.
