Artificial intelligence to improve clinical coding practice in Scandinavia: a crossover randomized controlled trial
Authors:
Taridzo Chomutare,
Therese Olsen Svenning,
Miguel Ángel Tejedor Hernández,
Phuong Dinh Ngo,
Andrius Budrionis,
Kaisa Markljung,
Lill Irene Hind,
Torbjørn Torsvik,
Karl Øyvind Mikalsen,
Aleksandar Babic,
Hercules Dalianis
Abstract:
\textbf{Trial design} Crossover randomized controlled trial. \textbf{Methods} An AI tool, Easy-ICD, was developed to assist clinical coders and was tested for improving both accuracy and time in a user study in Norway and Sweden. Participants were randomly assigned to two groups, and crossed over between coding complex (longer) texts versus simple (shorter) texts, while using our tool versus not u…
▽ More
\textbf{Trial design} Crossover randomized controlled trial. \textbf{Methods} An AI tool, Easy-ICD, was developed to assist clinical coders and was tested for improving both accuracy and time in a user study in Norway and Sweden. Participants were randomly assigned to two groups, and crossed over between coding complex (longer) texts versus simple (shorter) texts, while using our tool versus not using our tool. \textbf{Results} Based on Mann-Whitney U test, the median coding time difference for complex clinical text sequences was 123 seconds (\emph{P}\textless.001, 95\% CI: 81 to 164), representing a 46\% reduction in median coding time when our tool is used. There was no significant time difference for simpler text sequences. For coding accuracy, the improvement we noted for both complex and simple texts was not significant. \textbf{Conclusions} This study demonstrates the potential of AI to transform common tasks in clinical workflows, with ostensible positive impacts on work efficiencies for complex clinical coding tasks. Further studies within hospital workflows are required before these presumed impacts can be more clearly understood.
△ Less
Submitted 31 October, 2024;
originally announced October 2024.
Implementing a Nordic-Baltic Federated Health Data Network: a case report
Authors:
Taridzo Chomutare,
Aleksandar Babic,
Laura-Maria Peltonen,
Silja Elunurm,
Peter Lundberg,
Arne Jönsson,
Emma Eneling,
Ciprian-Virgil Gerstenberger,
Troels Siggaard,
Raivo Kolde,
Oskar Jerdhaf,
Martin Hansson,
Alexandra Makhlysheva,
Miroslav Muzny,
Erik Ylipää,
Søren Brunak,
Hercules Dalianis
Abstract:
Background: Centralized collection and processing of healthcare data across national borders pose significant challenges, including privacy concerns, data heterogeneity and legal barriers. To address some of these challenges, we formed an interdisciplinary consortium to develop a feder-ated health data network, comprised of six institutions across five countries, to facilitate Nordic-Baltic cooper…
▽ More
Background: Centralized collection and processing of healthcare data across national borders pose significant challenges, including privacy concerns, data heterogeneity and legal barriers. To address some of these challenges, we formed an interdisciplinary consortium to develop a feder-ated health data network, comprised of six institutions across five countries, to facilitate Nordic-Baltic cooperation on secondary use of health data. The objective of this report is to offer early insights into our experiences developing this network. Methods: We used a mixed-method ap-proach, combining both experimental design and implementation science to evaluate the factors affecting the implementation of our network. Results: Technically, our experiments indicate that the network functions without significant performance degradation compared to centralized simu-lation. Conclusion: While use of interdisciplinary approaches holds a potential to solve challeng-es associated with establishing such collaborative networks, our findings turn the spotlight on the uncertain regulatory landscape playing catch up and the significant operational costs.
△ Less
Submitted 26 September, 2024;
originally announced September 2024.
