-
Photonic Networks-on-Chip Employing Multilevel Signaling: A Cross-Layer Comparative Study
Authors:
Venkata Sai Praneeth Karempudi,
Febin Sunny,
Ishan G Thakkar,
Sai Vineel Reddy Chittamuru,
Mahdi Nikdast,
Sudeep Pasricha
Abstract:
Photonic network-on-chip (PNoC) architectures employ photonic links with dense wavelength-division multiplexing (DWDM) to enable high throughput on-chip transfers. Unfortunately, increasing the DWDM degree (i.e., using a larger number of wavelengths) to achieve higher aggregated datarate in photonic links, and hence higher throughput in PNoCs, requires sophisticated and costly laser sources along…
▽ More
Photonic network-on-chip (PNoC) architectures employ photonic links with dense wavelength-division multiplexing (DWDM) to enable high throughput on-chip transfers. Unfortunately, increasing the DWDM degree (i.e., using a larger number of wavelengths) to achieve higher aggregated datarate in photonic links, and hence higher throughput in PNoCs, requires sophisticated and costly laser sources along with extra photonic hardware. This extra hardware can introduce undesired noise to the photonic link and increase the bit-error-rate (BER), power, and area consumption of PNoCs. To mitigate these issues, the use of 4-pulse amplitude modulation (4-PAM) signaling, instead of the conventional on-off keying (OOK) signaling, can halve the wavelength signals utilized in photonic links for achieving the target aggregate datarate while reducing the overhead of crosstalk noise, BER, and photonic hardware. There are various designs of 4- PAM modulators reported in the literature. For example, the signal superposition (SS), electrical digital-to-analog converter (EDAC), and optical digital-to-analog converter (ODAC) based designs of 4-PAM modulators have been reports. However, it is yet to be explored how these SS, EDAC, and ODAC based 4-PAM modulators can be utilized to design DWDM-based photonic links and PNoC architectures. In this paper, we provide an extensive link-level and system-level of the SS, EDAC, and ODAC types of 4-PAM modulators from prior work with regards to their applicability and utilization overheads. From our link-level and PNoC-level evaluation, we have observed that the 4-PAM EDAC based variants of photonic links and PNoCs exhibit better performance and energy-efficiency compared to the OOK, 4-PAM SS, and 4-PAM ODAC based links and PNoCs.
△ Less
Submitted 12 October, 2021;
originally announced October 2021.
-
BPLight-CNN: A Photonics-based Backpropagation Accelerator for Deep Learning
Authors:
D. Dang,
S. V. R. Chittamuru,
S. Pasricha,
R. Mahapatra,
D. Sahoo
Abstract:
Training deep learning networks involves continuous weight updates across the various layers of the deep network while using a backpropagation algorithm (BP). This results in expensive computation overheads during training. Consequently, most deep learning accelerators today employ pre-trained weights and focus only on improving the design of the inference phase. The recent trend is to build a com…
▽ More
Training deep learning networks involves continuous weight updates across the various layers of the deep network while using a backpropagation algorithm (BP). This results in expensive computation overheads during training. Consequently, most deep learning accelerators today employ pre-trained weights and focus only on improving the design of the inference phase. The recent trend is to build a complete deep learning accelerator by incorporating the training module. Such efforts require an ultra-fast chip architecture for executing the BP algorithm. In this article, we propose a novel photonics-based backpropagation accelerator for high performance deep learning training. We present the design for a convolutional neural network, BPLight-CNN, which incorporates the silicon photonics-based backpropagation accelerator. BPLight-CNN is a first-of-its-kind photonic and memristor-based CNN architecture for end-to-end training and prediction. We evaluate BPLight-CNN using a photonic CAD framework (IPKISS) on deep learning benchmark models including LeNet and VGG-Net. The proposed design achieves (i) at least 34x speedup, 34x improvement in computational efficiency, and 38.5x energy savings, during training; and (ii) 29x speedup, 31x improvement in computational efficiency, and 38.7x improvement in energy savings, during inference compared to the state-of-the-art designs. All these comparisons are done at a 16-bit resolution; and BPLight-CNN achieves these improvements at a cost of approximately 6% lower accuracy compared to the state-of-the-art.
△ Less
Submitted 19 February, 2021;
originally announced February 2021.
-
Exploiting Process Variations to Secure Photonic NoC Architectures from Snooping Attacks
Authors:
Sai Vineel Reddy Chittamuru,
Ishan G Thakkar,
Sudeep Pasricha,
Sairam Sri Vatsavai,
Varun Bhat
Abstract:
The compact size and high wavelength-selectivity of microring resonators (MRs) enable photonic networks-on-chip (PNoCs) to utilize dense-wavelength-division-multiplexing (DWDM) in their photonic waveguides, and as a result, attain high bandwidth on-chip data transfers. Unfortunately, a Hardware Trojan in a PNoC can manipulate the electrical driving circuit of its MRs to cause the MRs to snoop data…
▽ More
The compact size and high wavelength-selectivity of microring resonators (MRs) enable photonic networks-on-chip (PNoCs) to utilize dense-wavelength-division-multiplexing (DWDM) in their photonic waveguides, and as a result, attain high bandwidth on-chip data transfers. Unfortunately, a Hardware Trojan in a PNoC can manipulate the electrical driving circuit of its MRs to cause the MRs to snoop data from the neighboring wavelength channels in a shared photonic waveguide, which introduces a serious security threat. This paper presents a framework that utilizes process variation-based authentication signatures along with architecture-level enhancements to protect against data-snooping Hardware Trojans during unicast as well as multicast transfers in PNoCs. Evaluation results indicate that our framework can improve hardware security across various PNoC architectures with minimal overheads of up to 14.2% in average latency and of up to 14.6% in energy-delay-product (EDP).
△ Less
Submitted 20 July, 2020;
originally announced July 2020.
