SWIFT: A modern highly-parallel gravity and smoothed particle hydrodynamics solver for astrophysical and cosmological applications
Authors:
Matthieu Schaller,
Josh Borrow,
Peter W. Draper,
Mladen Ivkovic,
Stuart McAlpine,
Bert Vandenbroucke,
Yannick Bahé,
Evgenii Chaikin,
Aidan B. G. Chalk,
Tsang Keung Chan,
Camila Correa,
Marcel van Daalen,
Willem Elbers,
Pedro Gonnet,
Loïc Hausammann,
John Helly,
Filip Huško,
Jacob A. Kegerreis,
Folkert S. J. Nobels,
Sylvia Ploeckinger,
Yves Revaz,
William J. Roper,
Sergio Ruiz-Bonilla,
Thomas D. Sandnes,
Yolan Uyttenhove
, et al. (2 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Numerical simulations have become one of the key tools used by theorists in all the fields of astrophysics and cosmology. The development of modern tools that target the largest existing computing systems and exploit state-of-the-art numerical methods and algorithms is thus crucial. In this paper, we introduce the fully open-source highly-parallel, versatile, and modular coupled hydrodynamics, gra…
▽ More
Numerical simulations have become one of the key tools used by theorists in all the fields of astrophysics and cosmology. The development of modern tools that target the largest existing computing systems and exploit state-of-the-art numerical methods and algorithms is thus crucial. In this paper, we introduce the fully open-source highly-parallel, versatile, and modular coupled hydrodynamics, gravity, cosmology, and galaxy-formation code SWIFT. The software package exploits hybrid shared- and distributed-memory task-based parallelism, asynchronous communications, and domain-decomposition algorithms based on balancing the workload, rather than the data, to efficiently exploit modern high-performance computing cluster architectures. Gravity is solved for using a fast-multipole-method, optionally coupled to a particle mesh solver in Fourier space to handle periodic volumes. For gas evolution, multiple modern flavours of Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics are implemented. SWIFT also evolves neutrinos using a state-of-the-art particle-based method. Two complementary networks of sub-grid models for galaxy formation as well as extensions to simulate planetary physics are also released as part of the code. An extensive set of output options, including snapshots, light-cones, power spectra, and a coupling to structure finders are also included. We describe the overall code architecture, summarise the consistency and accuracy tests that were performed, and demonstrate the excellent weak-scaling performance of the code using a representative cosmological hydrodynamical problem with $\approx$$300$ billion particles. The code is released to the community alongside extensive documentation for both users and developers, a large selection of example test problems, and a suite of tools to aid in the analysis of large simulations run with SWIFT.
△ Less
Submitted 29 March, 2024; v1 submitted 22 May, 2023;
originally announced May 2023.
Detecting Sound Events Using Convolutional Macaron Net With Pseudo Strong Labels
Authors:
Teck Kai Chan,
Cheng Siong Chin
Abstract:
In this paper, we propose addressing the lack of strongly labeled data by using pseudo strongly labeled data approximated using Convolutive Nonnegative Matrix Factorization. Using this set of data, we then train a novel architecture called the Convolutional Macaron Net (CMN), which combines Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) with MN, in a semi-supervised manner. Instead of training only a single m…
▽ More
In this paper, we propose addressing the lack of strongly labeled data by using pseudo strongly labeled data approximated using Convolutive Nonnegative Matrix Factorization. Using this set of data, we then train a novel architecture called the Convolutional Macaron Net (CMN), which combines Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) with MN, in a semi-supervised manner. Instead of training only a single model or using the Mean-teacher approach, we train two different CMNs synchronously using a curriculum consistency cost and a curriculum interpolated consistency cost. In the inference stage, one of the models will provide the frame-level prediction while the other model will provide the clip-level prediction. Our system outperforms the baseline system of the Detection and Classification of Acoustic Scenes and Events (DCASE) 2020 Challenge Task 4 by a margin of over 10% based on our proposed framework. By comparing with the top submission of the DCASE 2019 challenge, our system accuracy is also higher by 1.8%. On the other hand, as compared to the top submission of DCASE 2020, our accuracy is also marginally higher by 0.3%, even with fewer Transformer encoding layers. Our system remains robust on unseen YouTube evaluation dataset and has a winning margin of 0.6% and 6.3% against the top submission of DCASE 2019 and the baseline system.
△ Less
Submitted 2 August, 2021; v1 submitted 21 September, 2020;
originally announced September 2020.
Non-Negative Matrix Factorization-Convolutional Neural Network (NMF-CNN) For Sound Event Detection
Authors:
Teck Kai Chan,
Cheng Siong Chin,
Ye Li
Abstract:
The main scientific question of this year DCASE challenge, Task 4 - Sound Event Detection in Domestic Environments, is to investigate the types of data (strongly labeled synthetic data, weakly labeled data, unlabeled in domain data) required to achieve the best performing system. In this paper, we proposed a deep learning model that integrates Non-Negative Matrix Factorization (NMF) with Convoluti…
▽ More
The main scientific question of this year DCASE challenge, Task 4 - Sound Event Detection in Domestic Environments, is to investigate the types of data (strongly labeled synthetic data, weakly labeled data, unlabeled in domain data) required to achieve the best performing system. In this paper, we proposed a deep learning model that integrates Non-Negative Matrix Factorization (NMF) with Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). The key idea of such integration is to use NMF to provide an approximate strong label to the weakly labeled data. Such integration was able to achieve a higher event-based F1-score as compared to the baseline system (Evaluation Dataset: 30.39% vs. 23.7%, Validation Dataset: 31% vs. 25.8%). By comparing the validation results with other participants, the proposed system was ranked 8th among 19 teams (inclusive of the baseline system) in this year Task 4 challenge.
△ Less
Submitted 21 January, 2020;
originally announced January 2020.
