-
Honey, I shrunk the hypothesis space (through logical preprocessing)
Authors:
Andrew Cropper,
Filipe Gouveia,
David M. Cerna
Abstract:
Inductive logic programming (ILP) is a form of logical machine learning. The goal is to search a hypothesis space for a hypothesis that generalises training examples and background knowledge. We introduce an approach that 'shrinks' the hypothesis space before an ILP system searches it. Our approach uses background knowledge to find rules that cannot be in an optimal hypothesis regardless of the tr…
▽ More
Inductive logic programming (ILP) is a form of logical machine learning. The goal is to search a hypothesis space for a hypothesis that generalises training examples and background knowledge. We introduce an approach that 'shrinks' the hypothesis space before an ILP system searches it. Our approach uses background knowledge to find rules that cannot be in an optimal hypothesis regardless of the training examples. For instance, our approach discovers relationships such as "even numbers cannot be odd" and "prime numbers greater than 2 are odd". It then removes violating rules from the hypothesis space. We implement our approach using answer set programming and use it to shrink the hypothesis space of a constraint-based ILP system. Our experiments on multiple domains, including visual reasoning and game playing, show that our approach can substantially reduce learning times whilst maintaining predictive accuracies. For instance, given just 10 seconds of preprocessing time, our approach can reduce learning times from over 10 hours to only 2 seconds.
△ Less
Submitted 7 June, 2025;
originally announced June 2025.
-
Efficient rule induction by ignoring pointless rules
Authors:
Andrew Cropper,
David M. Cerna
Abstract:
The goal of inductive logic programming (ILP) is to find a set of logical rules that generalises training examples and background knowledge. We introduce an ILP approach that identifies pointless rules. A rule is pointless if it contains a redundant literal or cannot discriminate against negative examples. We show that ignoring pointless rules allows an ILP system to soundly prune the hypothesis s…
▽ More
The goal of inductive logic programming (ILP) is to find a set of logical rules that generalises training examples and background knowledge. We introduce an ILP approach that identifies pointless rules. A rule is pointless if it contains a redundant literal or cannot discriminate against negative examples. We show that ignoring pointless rules allows an ILP system to soundly prune the hypothesis space. Our experiments on multiple domains, including visual reasoning and game playing, show that our approach can reduce learning times by 99% whilst maintaining predictive accuracies.
△ Less
Submitted 3 February, 2025;
originally announced February 2025.
-
A Note On Square-free Sequences and Anti-unification Type
Authors:
David M. Cerna
Abstract:
Error: Peer-review process exposed an error in Theorem 1 that, unfourtunately, is not repairable. Idempotent semigroups are always finite. See Green and Rees [1952], Siekmann and Szabó [1981] for details Anti-unification is a fundamental operation used for inductive inference. It is abstractly defined as a process deriving from a set of symbolic expressions a new symbolic expression possessing cer…
▽ More
Error: Peer-review process exposed an error in Theorem 1 that, unfourtunately, is not repairable. Idempotent semigroups are always finite. See Green and Rees [1952], Siekmann and Szabó [1981] for details Anti-unification is a fundamental operation used for inductive inference. It is abstractly defined as a process deriving from a set of symbolic expressions a new symbolic expression possessing certain commonalities shared between its members. We consider anti-unification over term algebras where some function symbols are interpreted as associative-idempotent $(f (x, f (y, z)) = f (f (x, y), z)$ and $f (x, x) = x$, respectively) and show that there exists generalization problems for which a minimal complete set of solutions does not exist (Nullary), that is every complete set must contain comparable elements with respect to the generality relation. In contrast to earlier techniques for showing the nullarity of a generalization problem, we exploit combinatorial properties of complete sets of solutions to show that comparable elements are not avoidable. We show that every complete set of solutions contains an infinite chain of comparable generalizations whose structure is isomorphic to a subsequence of an infinite square-free sequence over three symbols.
△ Less
Submitted 3 March, 2025; v1 submitted 13 December, 2024;
originally announced December 2024.
-
Learning Rules Explaining Interactive Theorem Proving Tactic Prediction
Authors:
Liao Zhang,
David M. Cerna,
Cezary Kaliszyk
Abstract:
Formally verifying the correctness of mathematical proofs is more accessible than ever, however, the learning curve remains steep for many of the state-of-the-art interactive theorem provers (ITP). Deriving the most appropriate subsequent proof step, and reasoning about it, given the multitude of possibilities, remains a daunting task for novice users. To improve the situation, several investigati…
▽ More
Formally verifying the correctness of mathematical proofs is more accessible than ever, however, the learning curve remains steep for many of the state-of-the-art interactive theorem provers (ITP). Deriving the most appropriate subsequent proof step, and reasoning about it, given the multitude of possibilities, remains a daunting task for novice users. To improve the situation, several investigations have developed machine learning based guidance for tactic selection. Such approaches struggle to learn non-trivial relationships between the chosen tactic and the structure of the proof state and represent them as symbolic expressions. To address these issues we (i) We represent the problem as an Inductive Logic Programming (ILP) task, (ii) Using the ILP representation we enriched the feature space by encoding additional, computationally expensive properties as background knowledge predicates, (iii) We use this enriched feature space to learn rules explaining when a tactic is applicable to a given proof state, (iv) we use the learned rules to filter the output of an existing tactic selection approach and empirically show improvement over the non-filtering approaches.
△ Less
Submitted 2 November, 2024;
originally announced November 2024.
-
Scalable Knowledge Refactoring using Constrained Optimisation
Authors:
Minghao Liu,
David M. Cerna,
Filipe Gouveia,
Andrew Cropper
Abstract:
Knowledge refactoring compresses a logic program by introducing new rules. Current approaches struggle to scale to large programs. To overcome this limitation, we introduce a constrained optimisation refactoring approach. Our first key idea is to encode the problem with decision variables based on literals rather than rules. Our second key idea is to focus on linear invented rules. Our empirical r…
▽ More
Knowledge refactoring compresses a logic program by introducing new rules. Current approaches struggle to scale to large programs. To overcome this limitation, we introduce a constrained optimisation refactoring approach. Our first key idea is to encode the problem with decision variables based on literals rather than rules. Our second key idea is to focus on linear invented rules. Our empirical results on multiple domains show that our approach can refactor programs quicker and with more compression than the previous state-of-the-art approach, sometimes by 60%.
△ Less
Submitted 21 August, 2024;
originally announced August 2024.
-
One is all you need: Second-order Unification without First-order Variables
Authors:
David M. Cerna,
Julian Parsert
Abstract:
We introduce a fragment of second-order unification, referred to as \emph{Second-Order Ground Unification (SOGU)}, with the following properties: (i) only one second-order variable is allowed, and (ii) first-order variables do not occur. We study an equational variant of SOGU where the signature contains \textit{associative} binary function symbols (ASOGU) and show that Hilbert's 10$^{th}$ problem…
▽ More
We introduce a fragment of second-order unification, referred to as \emph{Second-Order Ground Unification (SOGU)}, with the following properties: (i) only one second-order variable is allowed, and (ii) first-order variables do not occur. We study an equational variant of SOGU where the signature contains \textit{associative} binary function symbols (ASOGU) and show that Hilbert's 10$^{th}$ problem is reducible to ASOGU unifiability, thus proving undecidability. Our reduction provides a new lower bound for the undecidability of second-order unification, as previous results required first-order variable occurrences, multiple second-order variables, and/or equational theories involving \textit{length-reducing} rewrite systems. Furthermore, our reduction holds even in the case when associativity of the binary function symbol is restricted to \emph{power associative}, i.e. f(f(x,x),x)= f(x,f(x,x)), as our construction requires a single constant.
△ Less
Submitted 30 May, 2025; v1 submitted 16 April, 2024;
originally announced April 2024.
-
Equational Anti-Unification over Absorption Theories
Authors:
Mauricio Ayala-Rincon,
David M. Cerna,
Andres Felipe Gonzalez Barragan,
Temur Kutsia
Abstract:
Interest in anti-unification, the dual problem of unification, is on the rise due to applications within the field of software analysis and related areas. For example, anti-unification-based techniques have found uses within clone detection and automatic program repair methods. While syntactic forms of anti-unification are enough for many applications, some aspects of software analysis methods are…
▽ More
Interest in anti-unification, the dual problem of unification, is on the rise due to applications within the field of software analysis and related areas. For example, anti-unification-based techniques have found uses within clone detection and automatic program repair methods. While syntactic forms of anti-unification are enough for many applications, some aspects of software analysis methods are more appropriately modeled by reasoning modulo an equational theory. Thus, extending existing anti-unification methods to deal with important equational theories is the natural step forward. This paper considers anti-unification modulo pure absorption theories, i.e., some operators are associated with a special constant satisfying the axiom $f(x,\varepsilon_f) \approx f(\varepsilon_f,x) \approx \varepsilon_f$. We provide a sound and complete rule-based algorithm for such theories. Furthermore, we show that anti-unification modulo absorption is infinitary. Despite this, our algorithm terminates and produces a finitary algorithmic representation of the minimal complete set of solutions. We also show that the linear variant is finitary.
△ Less
Submitted 17 October, 2023;
originally announced October 2023.
-
Schematic Unification
Authors:
David M. Cerna
Abstract:
We present a generalization of first-order unification to a term algebra where variable indexing is part of the object language. We exploit variable indexing by associating some sequences of variables ($X_0,\ X_1,\ X_2,\dots$) with a mapping $σ$ whose domain is the variable sequence and whose range consist of terms that may contain variables from the sequence. From a given term $t$, an infinite se…
▽ More
We present a generalization of first-order unification to a term algebra where variable indexing is part of the object language. We exploit variable indexing by associating some sequences of variables ($X_0,\ X_1,\ X_2,\dots$) with a mapping $σ$ whose domain is the variable sequence and whose range consist of terms that may contain variables from the sequence. From a given term $t$, an infinite sequence of terms may be produced by iterative application of $σ$. Given a unification problem $U$ and mapping $σ$, the \textit{schematic unification problem} asks whether all unification problems $U$, $σ(U)$, $σ(σ(U))$, $\dots$ are unifiable. We provide a terminating and sound algorithm. Our algorithm is \textit{complete} if we further restrict ourselves to so-called $\infty$-stable problems. We conjecture that this additional requirement is unnecessary for completeness. Schematic unification is related to methods of inductive proof transformation by resolution and inductive reasoning.
△ Less
Submitted 9 March, 2024; v1 submitted 15 June, 2023;
originally announced June 2023.
-
Anti-unification and Generalization: A Survey
Authors:
David M. Cerna,
Temur Kutsia
Abstract:
Anti-unification (AU) is a fundamental operation for generalization computation used for inductive inference. It is the dual operation to unification, an operation at the foundation of automated theorem proving. Interest in AU from the AI and related communities is growing, but without a systematic study of the concept nor surveys of existing work, investigations often resort to developing applica…
▽ More
Anti-unification (AU) is a fundamental operation for generalization computation used for inductive inference. It is the dual operation to unification, an operation at the foundation of automated theorem proving. Interest in AU from the AI and related communities is growing, but without a systematic study of the concept nor surveys of existing work, investigations often resort to developing application-specific methods that existing approaches may cover. We provide the first survey of AU research and its applications and a general framework for categorizing existing and future developments.
△ Less
Submitted 3 June, 2023; v1 submitted 1 February, 2023;
originally announced February 2023.
-
Generalisation Through Negation and Predicate Invention
Authors:
David M. Cerna,
Andrew Cropper
Abstract:
The ability to generalise from a small number of examples is a fundamental challenge in machine learning. To tackle this challenge, we introduce an inductive logic programming (ILP) approach that combines negation and predicate invention. Combining these two features allows an ILP system to generalise better by learning rules with universally quantified body-only variables. We implement our idea i…
▽ More
The ability to generalise from a small number of examples is a fundamental challenge in machine learning. To tackle this challenge, we introduce an inductive logic programming (ILP) approach that combines negation and predicate invention. Combining these two features allows an ILP system to generalise better by learning rules with universally quantified body-only variables. We implement our idea in NOPI, which can learn normal logic programs with predicate invention, including Datalog programs with stratified negation. Our experimental results on multiple domains show that our approach can improve predictive accuracies and learning times.
△ Less
Submitted 27 December, 2023; v1 submitted 18 January, 2023;
originally announced January 2023.
-
Differentiable Inductive Logic Programming in High-Dimensional Space
Authors:
Stanisław J. Purgał,
David M. Cerna,
Cezary Kaliszyk
Abstract:
Synthesizing large logic programs through symbolic Inductive Logic Programming (ILP) typically requires intermediate definitions. However, cluttering the hypothesis space with intensional predicates typically degrades performance. In contrast, gradient descent provides an efficient way to find solutions within such high-dimensional spaces. Neuro-symbolic ILP approaches have not fully exploited thi…
▽ More
Synthesizing large logic programs through symbolic Inductive Logic Programming (ILP) typically requires intermediate definitions. However, cluttering the hypothesis space with intensional predicates typically degrades performance. In contrast, gradient descent provides an efficient way to find solutions within such high-dimensional spaces. Neuro-symbolic ILP approaches have not fully exploited this so far. We propose extending the δILP approach to inductive synthesis with large-scale predicate invention, thus allowing us to exploit the efficacy of high-dimensional gradient descent. We show that large-scale predicate invention benefits differentiable inductive synthesis through gradient descent and allows one to learn solutions for tasks beyond the capabilities of existing neuro-symbolic ILP systems. Furthermore, we achieve these results without specifying the precise structure of the solution within the language bias.
△ Less
Submitted 8 January, 2025; v1 submitted 13 August, 2022;
originally announced August 2022.
-
One or Nothing: Anti-unification over the Simply-Typed Lambda Calculus
Authors:
David M. Cerna,
Michal Buran
Abstract:
Generalization techniques have many applications, including template construction, argument generalization, and indexing. Modern interactive provers can exploit advancement in generalization methods over expressive type theories to further develop proof generalization techniques and other transformations. So far, investigations concerned with anti-unification (AU) over $λ$-terms and similar type t…
▽ More
Generalization techniques have many applications, including template construction, argument generalization, and indexing. Modern interactive provers can exploit advancement in generalization methods over expressive type theories to further develop proof generalization techniques and other transformations. So far, investigations concerned with anti-unification (AU) over $λ$-terms and similar type theories have focused on developing algorithms for well-studied variants. These variants forbid the nesting of generalization variables, restrict the structure of their arguments, and are \textit{unitary}. Extending these methods to more expressive variants is important to applications. We consider the case of nested generalization variables and show that the AU problem is \textit{nullary} (using \textit{capture-avoiding} substitutions), even when the arguments to free variables are severely restricted.
△ Less
Submitted 15 March, 2024; v1 submitted 18 July, 2022;
originally announced July 2022.
-
A Special Case of Schematic Syntactic Unification
Authors:
David M. Cerna
Abstract:
We present a unification problem based on first-order syntactic unification which ask whether every problem in a schematically-defined sequence of unification problems is unifiable, so called loop unification. Alternatively, our problem may be formulated as a recursive procedure calling first-order syntactic unification on certain bindings occurring in the solved form resulting from unification. L…
▽ More
We present a unification problem based on first-order syntactic unification which ask whether every problem in a schematically-defined sequence of unification problems is unifiable, so called loop unification. Alternatively, our problem may be formulated as a recursive procedure calling first-order syntactic unification on certain bindings occurring in the solved form resulting from unification. Loop unification is closely related to Narrowing as the schematic constructions can be seen as a rewrite rule applied during unification, and primal grammars, as we deal with recursive term constructions. However, loop unification relaxes the restrictions put on variables as fresh as well as used extra variables may be introduced by rewriting. In this work we consider an important special case, so called semiloop unification. We provide a sufficient condition for unifiability of the entire sequence based on the structure of a sufficiently long initial segment. It remains an open question whether this condition is also necessary for semiloop unification and how it may be extended to loop unification.
△ Less
Submitted 25 January, 2022;
originally announced January 2022.
-
Learning Higher-Order Programs without Meta-Interpretive Learning
Authors:
Stanisław J. Purgał,
David M. Cerna,
Cezary Kaliszyk
Abstract:
Learning complex programs through inductive logic programming (ILP) remains a formidable challenge. Existing higher-order enabled ILP systems show improved accuracy and learning performance, though remain hampered by the limitations of the underlying learning mechanism. Experimental results show that our extension of the versatile Learning From Failures paradigm by higher-order definitions signifi…
▽ More
Learning complex programs through inductive logic programming (ILP) remains a formidable challenge. Existing higher-order enabled ILP systems show improved accuracy and learning performance, though remain hampered by the limitations of the underlying learning mechanism. Experimental results show that our extension of the versatile Learning From Failures paradigm by higher-order definitions significantly improves learning performance without the burdensome human guidance required by existing systems. Our theoretical framework captures a class of higher-order definitions preserving soundness of existing subsumption-based pruning methods.
△ Less
Submitted 15 May, 2022; v1 submitted 29 December, 2021;
originally announced December 2021.
-
A Mobile Application for Self-Guided Study of Formal Reasoning
Authors:
David M. Cerna,
Rafael P. D. Kiesel,
Alexandra Dzhiganskaya
Abstract:
In this work, we introduce AXolotl, a self-study aid designed to guide students through the basics of formal reasoning and term manipulation. Unlike most of the existing study aids for formal reasoning, AXolotl is an Android-based application with a simple touch-based interface. Part of the design goal was to minimize the possibility of user errors which distract from the learning process. Such a…
▽ More
In this work, we introduce AXolotl, a self-study aid designed to guide students through the basics of formal reasoning and term manipulation. Unlike most of the existing study aids for formal reasoning, AXolotl is an Android-based application with a simple touch-based interface. Part of the design goal was to minimize the possibility of user errors which distract from the learning process. Such as typos or inconsistent application of the provided rules. The system includes a zoomable proof viewer which displays the progress made so far and allows for storage of the completed proofs as a JPEG or LaTeX file. The software is available on the google play store and comes with a small library of problems. Additional problems may be opened in AXolotl using a simple input language. Currently, AXolotl supports problems that can be solved using rules which transform a single expression into a set of expressions. This covers educational scenarios found in our first-semester introduction to logic course and helps bridge the gap between propositional and first-order reasoning. Future developments will include rewrite rules which take a set of expressions and return a set of expressions, as well as a quantified first-order extension.
△ Less
Submitted 28 February, 2020;
originally announced February 2020.
-
Higher-Order Equational Pattern Anti-Unification [Preprint]
Authors:
David M. Cerna,
Temur Kutsia
Abstract:
We consider anti-unification for simply typed lambda terms in associative, commutative, and associative-commutative theories and develop a sound and complete algorithm which takes two lambda terms and computes their generalizations in the form of higher-order patterns. The problem is finitary: the minimal complete set of generalizations contains finitely many elements. We define the notion of opti…
▽ More
We consider anti-unification for simply typed lambda terms in associative, commutative, and associative-commutative theories and develop a sound and complete algorithm which takes two lambda terms and computes their generalizations in the form of higher-order patterns. The problem is finitary: the minimal complete set of generalizations contains finitely many elements. We define the notion of optimal solution and investigate special fragments of the problem for which the optimal solution can be computed in linear or polynomial time.
△ Less
Submitted 23 January, 2018;
originally announced January 2018.
-
Integrating a Global Induction Mechanism into a Sequent Calculus
Authors:
David M. Cerna,
Michael Peter Lettmann
Abstract:
Most interesting proofs in mathematics contain an inductive argument which requires an extension of the LK-calculus to formalize. The most commonly used calculi for induction contain a separate rule or axiom which reduces the valid proof theoretic properties of the calculus. To the best of our knowledge, there are no such calculi which allow cut-elimination to a normal form with the subformula pro…
▽ More
Most interesting proofs in mathematics contain an inductive argument which requires an extension of the LK-calculus to formalize. The most commonly used calculi for induction contain a separate rule or axiom which reduces the valid proof theoretic properties of the calculus. To the best of our knowledge, there are no such calculi which allow cut-elimination to a normal form with the subformula property, i.e. every formula occurring in the proof is a subformula of the end sequent. Proof schemata are a variant of LK-proofs able to simulate induction by linking proofs together. There exists a schematic normal form which has comparable proof theoretic behaviour to normal forms with the subformula property. However, a calculus for the construction of proof schemata does not exist. In this paper, we introduce a calculus for proof schemata and prove soundness and completeness with respect to a fragment of the inductive arguments formalizable in Peano arithmetic.
△ Less
Submitted 12 May, 2017;
originally announced May 2017.
-
Clausal Analysis of First-order Proof Schemata
Authors:
David M. Cerna,
Michael Lettmann
Abstract:
Proof schemata are a variant of LK-proofs able to simulate various induction schemes in first-order logic by adding so called proof links to the standard first-order LK-calculus. Proof links allow proofs to reference proofs thus giving proof schemata a recursive structure. Unfortunately, applying reductive cut- elimination is non-trivial in the presence of proof links. Borrowing the concept of laz…
▽ More
Proof schemata are a variant of LK-proofs able to simulate various induction schemes in first-order logic by adding so called proof links to the standard first-order LK-calculus. Proof links allow proofs to reference proofs thus giving proof schemata a recursive structure. Unfortunately, applying reductive cut- elimination is non-trivial in the presence of proof links. Borrowing the concept of lazy instantiation from functional programming, we evaluate proof links locally allowing reductive cut-elimination to proceed past them. Though, this method cannot be used to obtain cut-free proof schemata, we nonetheless obtain important results concerning the schematic CERES method, that is a method of cut-elimination for proof schemata based on resolution. In "Towards a clausal analysis of cut-elimination", it was shown that reductive cut-elimination transforms a given LK-proof in such a way that a subsumption relation holds between the pre- and post-transformation characteristic clause sets, i.e. the clause set representing the cut-structure of an LK-proof. Let CL(A') be the characteristic clause set of a normal form A' of an LK-proof A that is reached by performing reductive cut-elimination on A without atomic cut elimination. Then CL(A') is subsumed by all characteristic clause sets extractable from any application of reductive cut-elimination to A. Such a normal form is referred to as an ACNF top and plays an essential role in methods of cut-elimination by resolution. These results can be extended to proof schemata through our "lazy instantiation" of proof links, and provides an essential step toward a complete cut-elimination method for proof schemata.
△ Less
Submitted 8 February, 2017;
originally announced February 2017.
-
Taking a Detour to Zero: An Alternative Formalization of Functions Beyond PR
Authors:
David M. Cerna
Abstract:
There are two well known systems formalizing total recursion beyond primitive recursion (\textbf{PR}), system \textbf{T} by Gödel and system \textbf{F} by Girard and Reynolds. system \textbf{T} defines recursion on typed objects and can construct every function of Heyting arithmetic (\textbf{HA}). System \textbf{F} introduces type variables which can define the recursion of system \textbf{T}. The…
▽ More
There are two well known systems formalizing total recursion beyond primitive recursion (\textbf{PR}), system \textbf{T} by Gödel and system \textbf{F} by Girard and Reynolds. system \textbf{T} defines recursion on typed objects and can construct every function of Heyting arithmetic (\textbf{HA}). System \textbf{F} introduces type variables which can define the recursion of system \textbf{T}. The result is a system as expressive as second-order Heyting arithmetic (\textbf{HA}$_{2}$). Though, both are able to express unimaginably fast growing functions, in some applications a more flexible formalism is needed. One such application is CERES cut-elimination for schematic \textbf{LK}-proofs ($CERES_{s}$) where the shape of the recursion is important. In this paper we introduce a formalism for fast growing functions without a type theory foundation. The recursion is indexed by ordered sets of natural numbers. We highlight the relationship between our recursion and the Wainer hierarchy to provide an comparison to existing systems. We can show that our formalism expresses the functions expressible using system \textbf{T}. We leave comparison to system \textbf{F} and beyond to future work.
△ Less
Submitted 3 January, 2018; v1 submitted 23 September, 2016;
originally announced September 2016.
-
A Generalized Resolution Proof Schema and the Pigeonhole Principle
Authors:
David M. Cerna
Abstract:
The schematic CERES method is a method of cut elimination for proof schemata, that is a sequence of proofs with a recursive construction. Proof schemata can be thought of as a way to circumvent the addition of an induction rule to the LK-calculus. In this work, we formalize a schematic version of the Infinitary Pigeonhole Principle (IPP), in the LKS-calculus, and analyse the extracted clause set s…
▽ More
The schematic CERES method is a method of cut elimination for proof schemata, that is a sequence of proofs with a recursive construction. Proof schemata can be thought of as a way to circumvent the addition of an induction rule to the LK-calculus. In this work, we formalize a schematic version of the Infinitary Pigeonhole Principle (IPP), in the LKS-calculus, and analyse the extracted clause set schema. However, the refutation we find cannot be expressed as a resolution proof schema because there is no clear ordering of the terms indexing the recursion, every ordering is used in the refutation. Interesting enough, the clause set and its refutation is very close to a canonical form found in cut elimination of LK-proofs. Not being able to handle refutations of this form is problematic in that proof schema, when instantiated, are LK-proofs. Based on the structure of our refutation and structural results, we develop a generalized resolution proof schema based on recursion over a special type of list, and provide a refutation, using our generalization, of the clause set extracted from our formal proof of IPP. We also extract a Herbrand System from the refutation.
△ Less
Submitted 28 August, 2016;
originally announced August 2016.
