Skip to main content

Showing 1–3 of 3 results for author: Cattabriga, P

Searching in archive cs. Search in all archives.
.
  1. arXiv:2409.05903  [pdf, ps, other

    math.LO cs.LO

    Reflections on Russell's antinomy

    Authors: Paola Cattabriga

    Abstract: We present Russell's antinomy using three distinct deductive systems, which are then compared to deepen the logical deductions that lead to the contradiction. Some inferential paths are then presented, alternative to the commonly accepted one, that allow for the formal assertion of the antinomy without deriving the contradiction, thus preserving the coherence of the system. In light of this, the p… ▽ More

    Submitted 20 November, 2024; v1 submitted 6 September, 2024; originally announced September 2024.

    Comments: 15 pages, 7 figures

    MSC Class: 03Bxx; 03Exx; 03Axx

  2. arXiv:2404.04038  [pdf, ps, other

    cs.LO math.LO

    Refutability as Recursive as Provability

    Authors: Paola Cattabriga

    Abstract: Godel numbering is an arithmetization of sintax which defines provability by coding a primitive recursive predicate, Pf(x,v). A multiplicity of researches and results all around this well-known recursive predicate are today widespread in many areas of logic and AI. Not equally investigated is the refutability predicate defined by Godel numbering within the same primitive recursive status. Rf(x,v)… ▽ More

    Submitted 5 April, 2024; originally announced April 2024.

    Comments: 10 pages, presented at 100 Years of Refutation in Logic Workshop, UNILOG 2022. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:math/0606713

    MSC Class: 03D99 03B70 68Q01

  3. arXiv:1308.0497  [pdf, ps, other

    cs.CC cs.LO

    A note on Turing's 1936

    Authors: Paola Cattabriga

    Abstract: To a close reading of the original Turing article of 1936, we can learn it is based on the claim to have defined a number which is not computable, arguing that there can be no machine computing the diagonal on the enumeration of the computable sequences. This article carefully analyses the original 1936 argument, displaying how it cannot be considered a demonstration, and that there is indeed no e… ▽ More

    Submitted 15 May, 2023; v1 submitted 31 July, 2013; originally announced August 2013.

    Comments: 10 pages, for more information see http://paolacattabriga.wordpress.com/

    MSC Class: 03D10; 68Qxx