Personalised Serious Games and Gamification in Healthcare: Survey and Future Research Directions
Authors:
Stéphanie Carlier,
Femke De Backere,
Filip De Turck
Abstract:
Serious games and gamification (SGG) in eHealth have positive health impacts, but a personalized approach is needed due to diverse user contexts. This introduces challenges in achieving personalization in SGG. A literature search on Web of Science and PubMed identified 31 articles: 22 on serious games and 9 on gamification. These strategies are most applied in behavior change and rehabilitation, w…
▽ More
Serious games and gamification (SGG) in eHealth have positive health impacts, but a personalized approach is needed due to diverse user contexts. This introduces challenges in achieving personalization in SGG. A literature search on Web of Science and PubMed identified 31 articles: 22 on serious games and 9 on gamification. These strategies are most applied in behavior change and rehabilitation, with machine learning and AI showing promise for personalization. Reusability of personalisation algorithms and domain knowledge is underemphasized, reported in only 10 articles. Future research should standardize personalized SGG development, focusing on component reuse to streamline design and enhance evaluation.
△ Less
Submitted 27 November, 2024;
originally announced November 2024.
What Does This Notation Mean Anyway?
Authors:
David Feller,
Joe B. Wells,
Fairouz Kamareddine,
Sebastien Carlier
Abstract:
Following the introduction of BNF notation by Backus for the Algol 60 report and subsequent notational variants, a metalanguage involving formal "grammars" has developed for discussing structured objects in Computer Science and Mathematical Logic. We refer to this offspring of BNF as Math-BNF or MBNF, to the original BNF and its notational variants just as BNF, and to aspects common to both as BNF…
▽ More
Following the introduction of BNF notation by Backus for the Algol 60 report and subsequent notational variants, a metalanguage involving formal "grammars" has developed for discussing structured objects in Computer Science and Mathematical Logic. We refer to this offspring of BNF as Math-BNF or MBNF, to the original BNF and its notational variants just as BNF, and to aspects common to both as BNF-style. What all BNF-style notations share is the use of production rules roughly of this form: $$\bullet \mathrel{::=} \circ_1 \mid \cdots \mid \circ_n $$ Normally, such a rule says "every instance of $\circ_i$ for $i \in \{1, \ldots, n\}$ is also an in stance of $\bullet$". MBNF is distinct from BNF in the entities and operations it allows. Instead of strings, MBNF builds arrangements of symbols that we call math-text. Sometimes "syntax" is defined by interleaving MBNF production rules and other mathematical definitions that can contain chunks of math-text. There is no clear definition of MBNF. Readers do not have a document which tells them how MBNF is to be read and must learn MBNF through a process of cultural initiation. To the extent that MBNF is defined, it is largely through examples scattered throughout the literature and which require readers to guess the mathematical structures underpinning them. This paper gives MBNF examples illustrating some of the differences between MBNF and BNF. We propose a definition of syntactic math text (SMT) which handles many (but far from all) uses of math-text and MBNF in the wild. We aim to balance the goal of being accessible and not requiring too much prerequisite knowledge with the conflicting goal of providing a rich mathematical structure that already supports many uses and has possibilities to be extended to support more challenging cases.
△ Less
Submitted 12 June, 2018;
originally announced June 2018.
