-
Fixed and adaptive landmark sets for finite pseudometric spaces
Authors:
Jason Cory Brunson,
Yara Skaf
Abstract:
Topological data analysis (TDA) is an expanding field that leverages principles and tools from algebraic topology to quantify structural features of data sets or transform them into more manageable forms. As its theoretical foundations have been developed, TDA has shown promise in extracting useful information from high-dimensional, noisy, and complex data such as those used in biomedicine. To imp…
▽ More
Topological data analysis (TDA) is an expanding field that leverages principles and tools from algebraic topology to quantify structural features of data sets or transform them into more manageable forms. As its theoretical foundations have been developed, TDA has shown promise in extracting useful information from high-dimensional, noisy, and complex data such as those used in biomedicine. To improve efficiency, these techniques may employ landmark samplers. The heuristic maxmin procedure obtains a roughly even distribution of sample points by implicitly constructing a cover comprising sets of uniform radius. However, issues arise with data that vary in density or include points with multiplicities, as are common in biomedicine. We propose an analogous procedure, "lastfirst" based on ranked distances, which implies a cover comprising sets of uniform cardinality. We first rigorously define the procedure and prove that it obtains landmarks with desired properties. We then perform benchmark tests and compare its performance to that of maxmin, on feature detection and class prediction tasks involving simulated and real-world biomedical data. Lastfirst is more general than maxmin in that it can be applied to any data on which arbitrary (and not necessarily symmetric) pairwise distances can be computed. Lastfirst is more computationally costly, but our implementation scales at the same rate as maxmin. We find that lastfirst achieves comparable performance on prediction tasks and outperforms maxmin on homology detection tasks. Where the numerical values of similarity measures are not meaningful, as in many biomedical contexts, lastfirst sampling may also improve interpretability.
△ Less
Submitted 13 January, 2023; v1 submitted 19 December, 2022;
originally announced December 2022.
-
Triadic analysis of affiliation networks
Authors:
Jason Cory Brunson
Abstract:
Triadic closure has been conceptualized and measured in a variety of ways, most famously the clustering coefficient. Existing extensions to affiliation networks, however, are sensitive to repeat group attendance, which manifests in bipartite models as biclique proliferation. Whereas this sensitivity does not reflect common interpretations of triadic closure in social networks, this paper proposes…
▽ More
Triadic closure has been conceptualized and measured in a variety of ways, most famously the clustering coefficient. Existing extensions to affiliation networks, however, are sensitive to repeat group attendance, which manifests in bipartite models as biclique proliferation. Whereas this sensitivity does not reflect common interpretations of triadic closure in social networks, this paper proposes a measure of triadic closure in affiliation networks designed to control for it. To avoid arbitrariness, the paper introduces a triadic framework for affiliation networks, within which a range of measures can be defined; it then presents a set of basic axioms that suffice to narrow this range to the one measure. An instrumental assessment compares the proposed and two existing measures for reliability, validity, redundancy, and practicality. All three measures then take part in an investigation of three empirical social networks, which illustrates their differences.
△ Less
Submitted 23 June, 2016; v1 submitted 24 February, 2015;
originally announced February 2015.
-
The S-metric, the Beichl-Cloteaux approximation, and preferential attachment
Authors:
Jason Cory Brunson
Abstract:
The S-metric has grown popular in network studies, as a measure of ``scale-freeness'' restricted to the collection G(D) of connected graphs with a common degree sequence D=(d_1,\ldots,d_n). The calculation of S depends on the maximum possible degree assortativity r among graphs in G(D). The original method involves a heuristic construction of a maximally assortative graph g*. The approximation by…
▽ More
The S-metric has grown popular in network studies, as a measure of ``scale-freeness'' restricted to the collection G(D) of connected graphs with a common degree sequence D=(d_1,\ldots,d_n). The calculation of S depends on the maximum possible degree assortativity r among graphs in G(D). The original method involves a heuristic construction of a maximally assortative graph g*. The approximation by Beichl and Cloteaux involves constructing a possibly disconnected graph g' with r(g') >= r(g*) and requires O(n^2) tests for the graphicality of a degree sequence. The present paper uses the Tripathi-Vijay test to streamline this approximation, and thereby to investigate two collections of graphs: Barabasi-Albert trees and coauthorship graphs of mathematical sciences researchers. Long-term trends in the coauthorship graphs are discussed, and contextualized by insights derived from the BA trees. It is known that greater degree-based preferential attachment produces greater variance in degree sequences, and these trees exhibited assortativities restricted to a narrow band. In contrast, variance in degree rose over time in the coauthorship graphs in spite of weakening degree-based preferential attachment. These observations and their implications are discussed and avenues of future work are suggested.
△ Less
Submitted 19 August, 2013;
originally announced August 2013.
-
Evolutionary Events in a Mathematical Sciences Research Collaboration Network
Authors:
Jason Cory Brunson,
Steve Fassino,
Antonio McInnes,
Monisha Narayan,
Brianna Richardson,
Christopher Franck,
Patrick Ion,
Reinhard Laubenbacher
Abstract:
This study examines long-term trends and shifting behavior in the collaboration network of mathematics literature, using a subset of data from Mathematical Reviews spanning 1985-2009. Rather than modeling the network cumulatively, this study traces the evolution of the "here and now" using fixed-duration sliding windows. The analysis uses a suite of common network diagnostics, including the distri…
▽ More
This study examines long-term trends and shifting behavior in the collaboration network of mathematics literature, using a subset of data from Mathematical Reviews spanning 1985-2009. Rather than modeling the network cumulatively, this study traces the evolution of the "here and now" using fixed-duration sliding windows. The analysis uses a suite of common network diagnostics, including the distributions of degrees, distances, and clustering, to track network structure. Several random models that call these diagnostics as parameters help tease them apart as factors from the values of others. Some behaviors are consistent over the entire interval, but most diagnostics indicate that the network's structural evolution is dominated by occasional dramatic shifts in otherwise steady trends. These behaviors are not distributed evenly across the network; stark differences in evolution can be observed between two major subnetworks, loosely thought of as "pure" and "applied", which approximately partition the aggregate. The paper characterizes two major events along the mathematics network trajectory and discusses possible explanatory factors.
△ Less
Submitted 4 February, 2015; v1 submitted 22 March, 2012;
originally announced March 2012.
