Corruption in Auctions: Social Welfare Loss in Hybrid Multi-Unit Auctions
Authors:
Andries van Beek,
Ruben Brokkelkamp,
Guido Schäfer
Abstract:
We initiate the study of the social welfare loss caused by corrupt auctioneers, both in single-item and multi-unit auctions. In our model, the auctioneer may collude with the winning bidders by letting them lower their bids in exchange for a (possibly bidder-dependent) fraction $γ$ of the surplus. We consider different corruption schemes. In the most basic one, all winning bidders lower their bid…
▽ More
We initiate the study of the social welfare loss caused by corrupt auctioneers, both in single-item and multi-unit auctions. In our model, the auctioneer may collude with the winning bidders by letting them lower their bids in exchange for a (possibly bidder-dependent) fraction $γ$ of the surplus. We consider different corruption schemes. In the most basic one, all winning bidders lower their bid to the highest losing bid. We show that this setting is equivalent to a $γ$-hybrid auction in which the payments are a convex combination of first-price and the second-price payments. More generally, we consider corruption schemes that can be related to $γ$-approximate first-price auctions ($γ$-FPA), where the payments recover at least a $γ$-fraction of the first-price payments. Our goal is to obtain a precise understanding of the robust price of anarchy (POA) of such auctions. If no restrictions are imposed on the bids, we prove a bound on the robust POA of $γ$-FPA which is tight (over the entire range of $γ$) for the single-item and the multi-unit auction setting. On the other hand, if the bids satisfy the no-overbidding assumption a more fine-grained landscape of the price of anarchy emerges, depending on the auction setting and the equilibrium notion. Albeit being more challenging, we derive (almost) tight bounds for both auction settings and several equilibrium notions, basically leaving open some (small) gaps for the coarse-correlated price of anarchy only.
△ Less
Submitted 9 May, 2022; v1 submitted 3 June, 2021;
originally announced June 2021.
