-
Dividing sums of cycles in the semiring of functional digraphs
Authors:
Florian Bridoux,
Christophe Crespelle,
Thi Ha Duong Phan,
Adrien Richard
Abstract:
Functional digraphs are unlabelled finite digraphs where each vertex has exactly one out-neighbor. They are isomorphic classes of finite discrete-time dynamical systems. Endowed with the direct sum and product, functional digraphs form a semiring with an interesting multiplicative structure. For instance, we do not know if the following division problem can be solved in polynomial time: given two…
▽ More
Functional digraphs are unlabelled finite digraphs where each vertex has exactly one out-neighbor. They are isomorphic classes of finite discrete-time dynamical systems. Endowed with the direct sum and product, functional digraphs form a semiring with an interesting multiplicative structure. For instance, we do not know if the following division problem can be solved in polynomial time: given two functional digraphs $A$ and $B$, does $A$ divide $B$? That $A$ divides $B$ means that there exists a functional digraph $X$ such that $AX$ is isomorphic to $B$, and many such $X$ can exist. We can thus ask for the number of solutions $X$. In this paper, we focus on the case where $B$ is a sum of cycles (a disjoint union of cycles, corresponding to the limit behavior of finite discrete-time dynamical systems). There is then a naïve sub-exponential algorithm to compute the non-isomorphic solutions $X$, and our main result is an improvement of this algorithm which has the property to be polynomial when $A$ is fixed. It uses a divide-and-conquer technique that should be useful for further developments on the division problem.
△ Less
Submitted 16 April, 2025;
originally announced April 2025.
-
Interaction graphs of isomorphic automata networks II: universal dynamics
Authors:
Florian Bridoux,
Aymeric Picard Marchetto,
Adrien Richard
Abstract:
An automata network with $n$ components over a finite alphabet $Q$ of size $q$ is a discrete dynamical system described by the successive iterations of a function $f:Q^n\to Q^n$. In most applications, the main parameter is the interaction graph of $f$: the digraph with vertex set $[n]$ that contains an arc from $j$ to $i$ if $f_i$ depends on input $j$. What can be said on the set $\mathbb{G}(f)$ o…
▽ More
An automata network with $n$ components over a finite alphabet $Q$ of size $q$ is a discrete dynamical system described by the successive iterations of a function $f:Q^n\to Q^n$. In most applications, the main parameter is the interaction graph of $f$: the digraph with vertex set $[n]$ that contains an arc from $j$ to $i$ if $f_i$ depends on input $j$. What can be said on the set $\mathbb{G}(f)$ of the interaction graphs of the automata networks isomorphic to $f$? It seems that this simple question has never been studied. In a previous paper, we prove that the complete digraph $K_n$, with $n^2$ arcs, is universal in that $K_n\in \mathbb{G}(f)$ whenever $f$ is not constant nor the identity (and $n\geq 5$). In this paper, taking the opposite direction, we prove that there exists universal automata networks $f$, in that $\mathbb{G}(f)$ contains all the digraphs on $[n]$, excepted the empty one. Actually, we prove that the presence of only three specific digraphs in $\mathbb{G}(f)$ implies the universality of $f$, and we prove that this forces the alphabet size $q$ to have at least $n$ prime factors (with multiplicity). However, we prove that for any fixed $q\geq 3$, there exists almost universal functions, that is, functions $f:Q^n\to Q^n$ such that the probability that a random digraph belongs to $\mathbb{G}(f)$ tends to $1$ as $n\to\infty$. We do not know if this holds in the binary case $q=2$, providing only partial results.
△ Less
Submitted 12 September, 2024;
originally announced September 2024.
-
Asynchronous dynamics of isomorphic Boolean networks
Authors:
Florian Bridoux,
Aymeric Picard Marchetto,
Adrien Richard
Abstract:
A Boolean network is a function $f:\{0,1\}^n\to\{0,1\}^n$ from which several dynamics can be derived, depending on the context. The most classical ones are the synchronous and asynchronous dynamics. Both are digraphs on $\{0,1\}^n$, but the synchronous dynamics (which is identified with $f$) has an arc from $x$ to $f(x)$ while the asynchronous dynamics $\mathcal{A}(f)$ has an arc from $x$ to…
▽ More
A Boolean network is a function $f:\{0,1\}^n\to\{0,1\}^n$ from which several dynamics can be derived, depending on the context. The most classical ones are the synchronous and asynchronous dynamics. Both are digraphs on $\{0,1\}^n$, but the synchronous dynamics (which is identified with $f$) has an arc from $x$ to $f(x)$ while the asynchronous dynamics $\mathcal{A}(f)$ has an arc from $x$ to $x+e_i$ whenever $x_i\neq f_i(x)$. Clearly, $f$ and $\mathcal{A}(f)$ share the same information, but what can be said on these objects up to isomorphism? We prove that if $\mathcal{A}(f)$ is only known up to isomorphism then, with high probability, $f$ can be fully reconstructed up to isomorphism. We then show that the converse direction is far from being true. In particular, if $f$ is only known up to isomorphism, very little can be said on the attractors of $\mathcal{A}(f)$. For instance, if $f$ has $p$ fixed points, then $\mathcal{A}(f)$ has at least $\max(1,p)$ attractors, and we prove that this trivial lower bound is tight: there always exists $h\sim f$ such that $\mathcal{A}(h)$ has exactly $\max(1,p)$ attractors. But $\mathcal{A}(f)$ may often have much more attractors since we prove that, with high probability, there exists $h\sim f$ such that $\mathcal{A}(h)$ has $Ω(2^n)$ attractors.
△ Less
Submitted 5 February, 2024;
originally announced February 2024.
-
Interaction graphs of isomorphic automata networks I: complete digraph and minimum in-degree
Authors:
Florian Bridoux,
Kévin Perrot,
Aymeric Picard Marchetto,
Adrien Richard
Abstract:
An automata network with $n$ components over a finite alphabet $Q$ of size $q$ is a discrete dynamical system described by the successive iterations of a function $f:Q^n\to Q^n$. In most applications, the main parameter is the interaction graph of $f$: the digraph with vertex set $[n]$ that contains an arc from $j$ to $i$ if $f_i$ depends on input $j$. What can be said on the set $\mathbb{G}(f)$ o…
▽ More
An automata network with $n$ components over a finite alphabet $Q$ of size $q$ is a discrete dynamical system described by the successive iterations of a function $f:Q^n\to Q^n$. In most applications, the main parameter is the interaction graph of $f$: the digraph with vertex set $[n]$ that contains an arc from $j$ to $i$ if $f_i$ depends on input $j$. What can be said on the set $\mathbb{G}(f)$ of the interaction graphs of the automata networks isomorphic to $f$? It seems that this simple question has never been studied. Here, we report some basic facts. First, we prove that if $n\geq 5$ or $q\geq 3$ and $f$ is neither the identity nor constant, then $\mathbb{G}(f)$ always contains the complete digraph $K_n$, with $n^2$ arcs. Then, we prove that $\mathbb{G}(f)$ always contains a digraph whose minimum in-degree is bounded as a function of $q$. Hence, if $n$ is large with respect to $q$, then $\mathbb{G}(f)$ cannot only contain $K_n$. However, we prove that $\mathbb{G}(f)$ can contain only dense digraphs, with at least $\lfloor n^2/4 \rfloor$ arcs.
△ Less
Submitted 5 January, 2023;
originally announced January 2023.
-
Complexity of limit cycles with block-sequential update schedules in conjunctive networks
Authors:
Julio Aracena,
Florian Bridoux,
Luis Gómez,
Lilian Salinas
Abstract:
In this paper, we deal the following decision problem: given a conjunctive Boolean network defined by its interaction digraph, does it have a limit cycle of a given length k? We prove that this problem is NP-complete in general if k is a parameter of the problem and in P if the interaction digraph is strongly connected. The case where $k$ is a constant, but the interaction digraph is not strongly…
▽ More
In this paper, we deal the following decision problem: given a conjunctive Boolean network defined by its interaction digraph, does it have a limit cycle of a given length k? We prove that this problem is NP-complete in general if k is a parameter of the problem and in P if the interaction digraph is strongly connected. The case where $k$ is a constant, but the interaction digraph is not strongly connected remains open. Furthermore, we study the variation of the decision problem: given a conjunctive Boolean network, does there exist a block-sequential (resp. sequential) update schedule such that there exists a limit cycle of length k? We prove that this problem is NP-complete for any constant k >= 2.
△ Less
Submitted 21 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
-
Complexity of fixed point counting problems in Boolean Networks
Authors:
Florian Bridoux,
Amélia Durbec,
Kévin Perrot,
Adrien Richard
Abstract:
A Boolean network (BN) with $n$ components is a discrete dynamical system described by the successive iterations of a function $f:\{0,1\}^n \to \{0,1\}^n$. This model finds applications in biology, where fixed points play a central role. For example, in genetic regulations, they correspond to cell phenotypes. In this context, experiments reveal the existence of positive or negative influences amon…
▽ More
A Boolean network (BN) with $n$ components is a discrete dynamical system described by the successive iterations of a function $f:\{0,1\}^n \to \{0,1\}^n$. This model finds applications in biology, where fixed points play a central role. For example, in genetic regulations, they correspond to cell phenotypes. In this context, experiments reveal the existence of positive or negative influences among components: component $i$ has a positive (resp. negative) influence on component $j$ meaning that $j$ tends to mimic (resp. negate) $i$. The digraph of influences is called signed interaction digraph (SID), and one SID may correspond to a large number of BNs (which is, in average, doubly exponential according to $n$). The present work opens a new perspective on the well-established study of fixed points in BNs. When biologists discover the SID of a BN they do not know, they may ask: given that SID, can it correspond to a BN having at least/at most $k$ fixed points? Depending on the input, we prove that these problems are in $\textrm{P}$ or complete for $\textrm{NP}$, $\textrm{NP}^{\textrm{NP}}$, $\textrm{NP}^{\textrm{#P}}$ or $\textrm{NEXPTIME}$. In particular, we prove that it is $\textrm{NP}$-complete (resp. $\textrm{NEXPTIME}$-complete) to decide if a given SID can correspond to a BN having at least two fixed points (resp. no fixed point).
△ Less
Submitted 9 February, 2022; v1 submitted 4 December, 2020;
originally announced December 2020.
-
Commutative automata networks
Authors:
Florian Bridoux,
Maximilien Gadouleau,
Guillaume Theyssier
Abstract:
Automata networks are mappings of the form f : Q Z $\rightarrow$ Q Z , where Q is a finite alphabet and Z is a set of entities; they generalise Cellular Automata and Boolean networks. An update schedule dictates when each entity updates its state according to its local function fi : Q Z $\rightarrow$ Q. One major question is to study the behaviour of a given automata networks under different updat…
▽ More
Automata networks are mappings of the form f : Q Z $\rightarrow$ Q Z , where Q is a finite alphabet and Z is a set of entities; they generalise Cellular Automata and Boolean networks. An update schedule dictates when each entity updates its state according to its local function fi : Q Z $\rightarrow$ Q. One major question is to study the behaviour of a given automata networks under different update schedules. In this paper, we study automata networks that are invariant under many different update schedules. This gives rise to two definitions, locally commutative and globally commu-tative networks. We investigate the relation between commutativity and different forms of locality of update functions; one main conclusion is that globally commutative networks have strong dynamical properties, while locally commutative networks are much less constrained. We also give a complete classification of all globally commutative Boolean networks.
△ Less
Submitted 21 April, 2020;
originally announced April 2020.
-
On simulation in automata networks
Authors:
Florian Bridoux,
Maximilien Gadouleau,
Guillaume Theyssier
Abstract:
An automata network is a finite graph where each node holds a state from some finite alphabet and is equipped with an update function that changes its state according to the configuration of neighboring states. More concisely, it is given by a finite map $f:Q^n\rightarrow Q^n$. In this paper we study how some (sets of) automata networks can be simulated by some other (set of) automata networks wit…
▽ More
An automata network is a finite graph where each node holds a state from some finite alphabet and is equipped with an update function that changes its state according to the configuration of neighboring states. More concisely, it is given by a finite map $f:Q^n\rightarrow Q^n$. In this paper we study how some (sets of) automata networks can be simulated by some other (set of) automata networks with prescribed update mode or interaction graph. Our contributions are the following. For non-Boolean alphabets and for any network size, there are intrinsically non-sequential transformations (i.e. that can not be obtained as composition of sequential updates of some network). Moreover there is no universal automaton network that can produce all non-bijective functions via compositions of asynchronous updates. On the other hand, we show that there are universal automata networks for sequential updates if one is allowed to use a larger alphabet and then use either projection onto or restriction to the original alphabet. We also characterize the set of functions that are generated by non-bijective sequential updates. Following Tchuente, we characterize the interaction graphs $D$ whose semigroup of transformations is the full semigroup of transformations on $Q^n$, and we show that they are the same if we force either sequential updates only, or all asynchronous updates.
△ Less
Submitted 27 April, 2020; v1 submitted 24 January, 2020;
originally announced January 2020.
-
Complexity of limit-cycle problems in Boolean networks
Authors:
Florian Bridoux,
Caroline Gaze-Maillot,
Kévin Perrot,
Sylvain Sené
Abstract:
Boolean networks are a general model of interacting entities, with applications to biological phenomena such as gene regulation. Attractors play a central role, and the schedule of entities update is a priori unknown. This article presents results on the computational complexity of problems related to the existence of update schedules such that some limit-cycle lengths are possible or not. We firs…
▽ More
Boolean networks are a general model of interacting entities, with applications to biological phenomena such as gene regulation. Attractors play a central role, and the schedule of entities update is a priori unknown. This article presents results on the computational complexity of problems related to the existence of update schedules such that some limit-cycle lengths are possible or not. We first prove that given a Boolean network updated in parallel, knowing whether it has at least one limit-cycle of length $k$ is $\text{NP}$-complete. Adding an existential quantification on the block-sequential update schedule does not change the complexity class of the problem, but the following alternation brings us one level above in the polynomial hierarchy: given a Boolean network, knowing whether there exists a block-sequential update schedule such that it has no limit-cycle of length $k$ is $Σ_2^\text{P}$-complete.
△ Less
Submitted 21 January, 2020;
originally announced January 2020.
-
Expansive Automata Networks
Authors:
Florian Bridoux,
Maximilien Gadouleau,
Guillaume Theyssier
Abstract:
An Automata Network is a map ${f:Q^n\rightarrow Q^n}$ where $Q$ is a finite alphabet. It can be viewed as a network of $n$ entities, each holding a state from $Q$, and evolving according to a deterministic synchronous update rule in such a way that each entity only depends on its neighbors in the network's graph, called interaction graph. A major trend in automata network theory is to understand h…
▽ More
An Automata Network is a map ${f:Q^n\rightarrow Q^n}$ where $Q$ is a finite alphabet. It can be viewed as a network of $n$ entities, each holding a state from $Q$, and evolving according to a deterministic synchronous update rule in such a way that each entity only depends on its neighbors in the network's graph, called interaction graph. A major trend in automata network theory is to understand how the interaction graph affects dynamical properties of $f$. In this work we introduce the following property called expansivity: the observation of the sequence of states at any given node is sufficient to determine the initial configuration of the whole network. Our main result is a characterization of interaction graphs that allow expansivity. Moreover, we show that this property is generic among linear automata networks over such graphs with large enough alphabet. We show however that the situation is more complex when the alphabet is fixed independently of the size of the interaction graph: no alphabet is sufficient to obtain expansivity on all admissible graphs, and only non-linear solutions exist in some cases. Finally, among other results, we consider a stronger version of expansivity where we ask to determine the initial configuration from any large enough observation of the system. We show that it can be achieved for any number of nodes and naturally gives rise to maximum distance separable codes.
△ Less
Submitted 21 February, 2019;
originally announced February 2019.
-
Sequentialization and Procedural Complexity in Automata Networks
Authors:
Florian Bridoux
Abstract:
In this article we consider finite automata networks (ANs) with two kinds of update schedules: the parallel one (all automata are updated all together) and the sequential ones (the automata are updated periodically one at a time according to a total order w). The cost of sequentialization of a given AN h is the number of additional automata required to simulate h by a sequential AN with the same a…
▽ More
In this article we consider finite automata networks (ANs) with two kinds of update schedules: the parallel one (all automata are updated all together) and the sequential ones (the automata are updated periodically one at a time according to a total order w). The cost of sequentialization of a given AN h is the number of additional automata required to simulate h by a sequential AN with the same alphabet. We construct, for any n and q, an AN h of size n and alphabet size q whose cost of sequentialization is at least n/3. We also show that, if q $\ge$ 4, we can find one whose cost is at least n/2 -- log q (n). We prove that n/2 + log q (n/2 + 1) is an upper bound for the cost of sequentialization of any AN h of size n and alphabet size q. Finally, we exhibit the exact relation between the cost of sequentialization of h and its procedural complexity with unlimited memory and prove that its cost of sequentialization is less than or equal to the pathwidth of its interaction graph.
△ Less
Submitted 1 March, 2018;
originally announced March 2018.
-
On the cost of simulating a parallel Boolean automata network by a block-sequential one
Authors:
Florian Bridoux,
Pierre Guillon,
Kévin Perrot,
Sylvain Sené,
Guillaume Theyssier
Abstract:
In this article we study the minimum number $κ$ of additional automata that a Boolean automata network (BAN) associated with a given block-sequential update schedule needs in order to simulate a given BAN with a parallel update schedule. We introduce a graph that we call $\mathsf{NECC}$ graph built from the BAN and the update schedule. We show the relation between $κ$ and the chromatic number of t…
▽ More
In this article we study the minimum number $κ$ of additional automata that a Boolean automata network (BAN) associated with a given block-sequential update schedule needs in order to simulate a given BAN with a parallel update schedule. We introduce a graph that we call $\mathsf{NECC}$ graph built from the BAN and the update schedule. We show the relation between $κ$ and the chromatic number of the $\mathsf{NECC}$ graph. Thanks to this $\mathsf{NECC}$ graph, we bound $κ$ in the worst case between $n/2$ and $2n/3+2$ ($n$ being the size of the BAN simulated) and we conjecture that this number equals $n/2$. We support this conjecture with two results: the clique number of a $\mathsf{NECC}$ graph is always less than or equal to $n/2$ and, for the subclass of bijective BANs, $κ$ is always less than or equal to $n/2+1$.
△ Less
Submitted 10 February, 2017;
originally announced February 2017.
-
Complete Simulation of Automata Networks
Authors:
Florian Bridoux,
Alonso Castillo-Ramirez,
Maximilien Gadouleau
Abstract:
Consider a finite set $A$ and an integer $n \geq 1$. This paper studies the concept of complete simulation in the context of semigroups of transformations of $A^n$, also known as finite state-homogeneous automata networks. For $m \geq n$, a transformation of $A^m$ is \emph{$n$-complete of size $m$} if it may simulate every transformation of $A^n$ by updating one coordinate (or register) at a time.…
▽ More
Consider a finite set $A$ and an integer $n \geq 1$. This paper studies the concept of complete simulation in the context of semigroups of transformations of $A^n$, also known as finite state-homogeneous automata networks. For $m \geq n$, a transformation of $A^m$ is \emph{$n$-complete of size $m$} if it may simulate every transformation of $A^n$ by updating one coordinate (or register) at a time. Using tools from memoryless computation, it is established that there is no $n$-complete transformation of size $n$, but there is such a transformation of size $n+1$. By studying the the time of simulation of various $n$-complete transformations, it is conjectured that the maximal time of simulation of any $n$-complete transformation is at least $2n$. A transformation of $A^m$ is \emph{sequentially $n$-complete of size $m$} if it may sequentially simulate every finite sequence of transformations of $A^n$; in this case, minimal examples and bounds for the size and time of simulation are determined. It is also shown that there is no $n$-complete transformation that updates all the registers in parallel, but that there exists a sequentally $n$-complete transformation that updates all but one register in parallel. This illustrates the strengths and weaknesses of parallel models of computation, such as cellular automata.
△ Less
Submitted 9 March, 2018; v1 submitted 1 April, 2015;
originally announced April 2015.
