-
Closing the complexity gap of the double distance problem
Authors:
Luís Cunha,
Thiago Lopes,
Uéverton Souza,
Marília D. V. Braga,
Jens Stoye
Abstract:
Genome rearrangement has been an active area of research in computational comparative genomics for the last three decades. While initially mostly an interesting algorithmic endeavor, now the practical application by applying rearrangement distance methods and more advanced phylogenetic tasks is becoming common practice, given the availability of many completely sequenced genomes. Several genome re…
▽ More
Genome rearrangement has been an active area of research in computational comparative genomics for the last three decades. While initially mostly an interesting algorithmic endeavor, now the practical application by applying rearrangement distance methods and more advanced phylogenetic tasks is becoming common practice, given the availability of many completely sequenced genomes. Several genome rearrangement models have been developed over time, sometimes with surprising computational properties. A prominent example is the fact that computing the reversal distance of two signed permutations is possible in linear time, while for two unsigned permutations it is NP-hard. Therefore one has always to be careful about the precise problem formulation and complexity analysis of rearrangement problems in order not to be fooled. The double distance is the minimum number of genomic rearrangements between a singular and a duplicated genome that, in addition to rearrangements, are separated by a whole genome duplication. At the same time it allows to assign the genes of the duplicated genome to the two paralogous chromosome copies that existed right after the duplication event. Computing the double distance is another example of a tricky hardness landscape: If the distance measure underlying the double distance is the simple breakpoint distance, the problem can be solved in linear time, while with the more elaborate DCJ distance it is NP-hard. Indeed, there is a family of distance measures, parameterized by an even number k, between the breakpoint distance (k=2) and the DCJ distance (k=\infty). Little was known about the hardness border between these extremes; the problem complexity was known only for k=4 and k=6. In this paper, we close the gap, providing a full picture of the hardness landscape when computing the double distance.
△ Less
Submitted 3 November, 2024;
originally announced November 2024.
-
Investigating the complexity of the double distance problems
Authors:
Marilia D. V. Braga,
Leonie R. Brockmann,
Katharina Klerx,
Jens Stoye
Abstract:
Two genomes over the same set of gene families form a canonical pair when each of them has exactly one gene from each family. Different distances of canonical genomes can be derived from a structure called breakpoint graph, which represents the relation between the two given genomes as a collection of cycles of even length and paths. Then, the breakpoint distance is equal to n - (c_2 + p_0/2), whe…
▽ More
Two genomes over the same set of gene families form a canonical pair when each of them has exactly one gene from each family. Different distances of canonical genomes can be derived from a structure called breakpoint graph, which represents the relation between the two given genomes as a collection of cycles of even length and paths. Then, the breakpoint distance is equal to n - (c_2 + p_0/2), where n is the number of genes, c_2 is the number of cycles of length 2 and p_0 is the number of paths of length 0. Similarly, when the considered rearrangements are those modeled by the double-cut-and-join (DCJ) operation, the rearrangement distance is n - (c + p_e/2), where c is the total number of cycles and p_e is the total number of even paths.
The distance formulation is a basic unit for several other combinatorial problems related to genome evolution and ancestral reconstruction, such as median or double distance. Interestingly, both median and double distance problems can be solved in polynomial time for the breakpoint distance, while they are NP-hard for the rearrangement distance. One way of exploring the complexity space between these two extremes is to consider the σ_k distance, defined to be n - [c_2 + c_4 + ... + c_k + (p_0 + p_2 + ... +p_k)/2], and increasingly investigate the complexities of median and double distance for the σ_4 distance, then the σ_6 distance, and so on. While for the median much effort was done in our and in other research groups but no progress was obtained even for the σ_4 distance, for solving the double distance under σ_4 and σ_6 distances we could devise linear time algorithms, which we present here.
△ Less
Submitted 1 April, 2023; v1 submitted 7 March, 2023;
originally announced March 2023.
-
Natural family-free genomic distance
Authors:
Diego P. Rubert,
Fábio V. Martinez,
Marília D. V. Braga
Abstract:
A classical problem in comparative genomics is to compute the rearrangement distance, that is the minimum number of large-scale rearrangements required to transform a given genome into another given genome.
While the most traditional approaches in this area are family-based, i.e., require the classification of DNA fragments into families, more recently an alternative family-free approach was pro…
▽ More
A classical problem in comparative genomics is to compute the rearrangement distance, that is the minimum number of large-scale rearrangements required to transform a given genome into another given genome.
While the most traditional approaches in this area are family-based, i.e., require the classification of DNA fragments into families, more recently an alternative family-free approach was proposed, and consists of studying the rearrangement distances without prior family assignment. On the one hand the computation of genomic distances in the family-free setting helps to match occurrences of duplicated genes and find homologies, but on the other hand this computation is NP-hard. In this paper, by letting structural rearrangements be represented by the generic double cut and join (DCJ) operation and also allowing insertions and deletions of DNA segments, we propose a new and more general family-free genomic distance, providing an efficient ILP formulation to solve it.
Our experiments show that the ILP produces accurate results and can handle not only bacterial genomes, but also fungi and insects, or subsets of chromosomes of mammals and plants.
△ Less
Submitted 14 July, 2020; v1 submitted 7 July, 2020;
originally announced July 2020.
-
Computing the rearrangement distance of natural genomes
Authors:
Leonard Bohnenkämper,
Marília D. V. Braga,
Daniel Doerr,
Jens Stoye
Abstract:
The computation of genomic distances has been a very active field of computational comparative genomics over the last 25 years. Substantial results include the polynomial-time computability of the inversion distance by Hannenhalli and Pevzner in 1995 and the introduction of the double-cut and join (DCJ) distance by Yancopoulos et al. in 2005. Both results, however, rely on the assumption that the…
▽ More
The computation of genomic distances has been a very active field of computational comparative genomics over the last 25 years. Substantial results include the polynomial-time computability of the inversion distance by Hannenhalli and Pevzner in 1995 and the introduction of the double-cut and join (DCJ) distance by Yancopoulos et al. in 2005. Both results, however, rely on the assumption that the genomes under comparison contain the same set of unique markers (syntenic genomic regions, sometimes also referred to as genes). In 2015, Shao, Lin and Moret relax this condition by allowing for duplicate markers in the analysis. This generalized version of the genomic distance problem is NP-hard, and they give an ILP solution that is efficient enough to be applied to real-world datasets. A restriction of their approach is that it can be applied only to balanced genomes, that have equal numbers of duplicates of any marker. Therefore it still needs a delicate preprocessing of the input data in which excessive copies of unbalanced markers have to be removed.
In this paper we present an algorithm solving the genomic distance problem for natural genomes, in which any marker may occur an arbitrary number of times. Our method is based on a new graph data structure, the multi-relational diagram, that allows an elegant extension of the ILP by Shao, Lin and Moret to count runs of markers that are under- or over-represented in one genome with respect to the other and need to be inserted or deleted, respectively. With this extension, previous restrictions on the genome configurations are lifted, for the first time enabling an uncompromising rearrangement analysis. Any marker sequence can directly be used for the distance calculation.
The evaluation of our approach shows that it can be used to analyze genomes with up to a few ten thousand markers, which we demonstrate on simulated and real data.
△ Less
Submitted 2 October, 2020; v1 submitted 7 January, 2020;
originally announced January 2020.
-
Computing the Inversion-Indel Distance
Authors:
Eyla Willing,
Jens Stoye,
Marília D. V. Braga
Abstract:
The inversion distance, that is the distance between two unichromosomal genomes with the same content allowing only inversions of DNA segments, can be exactly computed thanks to a pioneering approach of Hannenhalli and Pevzner from 1995. In 2000, El-Mabrouk extended the inversion model to perform the comparison of unichromosomal genomes with unequal contents, combining inversions with insertions a…
▽ More
The inversion distance, that is the distance between two unichromosomal genomes with the same content allowing only inversions of DNA segments, can be exactly computed thanks to a pioneering approach of Hannenhalli and Pevzner from 1995. In 2000, El-Mabrouk extended the inversion model to perform the comparison of unichromosomal genomes with unequal contents, combining inversions with insertions and deletions (indels) of DNA segments, giving rise to the inversion-indel distance. However, only a heuristic was provided for its computation. In 2005, Yancopoulos, Attie and Friedberg started a new branch of research by introducing the generic double cut and join (DCJ) operation, that can represent several genome rearrangements (including inversions). In 2006, Bergeron, Mixtacki and Stoye showed that the DCJ distance can be computed in linear time with a very simple procedure. As a consequence, in 2010 we gave a linear-time algorithm to compute the DCJ-indel distance. This result allowed the inversion-indel model to be revisited from another angle. In 2013, we could show that, when the diagram that represents the relation between the two compared genomes has no bad components, the inversion-indel distance is equal to the DCJ-indel distance. In the present work we complete the study of the inversion-indel distance by giving the first algorithm to compute it exactly even in the presence of bad components.
△ Less
Submitted 27 September, 2019;
originally announced September 2019.
