-
Random-Order Interval Selection
Authors:
Allan Borodin,
Christodoulos Karavasilis
Abstract:
In the problem of online unweighted interval selection, the objective is to maximize the number of non-conflicting intervals accepted by the algorithm. In the conventional online model of irrevocable decisions, there is an Omega(n) lower bound on the competitive ratio, even for randomized algorithms [Bachmann et al. 2013]. In a line of work that allows for revocable acceptances, [Faigle and Nawijn…
▽ More
In the problem of online unweighted interval selection, the objective is to maximize the number of non-conflicting intervals accepted by the algorithm. In the conventional online model of irrevocable decisions, there is an Omega(n) lower bound on the competitive ratio, even for randomized algorithms [Bachmann et al. 2013]. In a line of work that allows for revocable acceptances, [Faigle and Nawijn 1995] gave a greedy 1-competitive (i.e. optimal) algorithm in the real-time model, where intervals arrive in order of non-decreasing starting times. The natural extension of their algorithm in the adversarial (any-order) model is 2k-competitive [Borodin and Karavasilis 2023], when there are at most k different interval lengths, and that is optimal for all deterministic, and memoryless randomized algorithms. We study this problem in the random-order model, where the adversary chooses the instance, but the online sequence is a uniformly random permutation of the items. We consider the same algorithm that is optimal in the cases of the real-time and any-order models, and give an upper bound of 2.5 on the competitive ratio under random-order arrivals. We also initiate a study of utilizing random-order arrivals to extract random bits with the goal of derandomizing algorithms. Besides producing simple algorithms, simulating random bits through random arrivals enhances our understanding of the comparative strength of the two models. Our main extraction process returns a bit with a worst-case bias of 2 - sqrt(2) = 0.585 and operates under the mild assumption that there exist at least two distinct items in the input. We motivate the applicability of this process by using it to simulate a number of barely random algorithms for interval selection (single-length arbitrary weights, and C-benevolent instances), the general knapsack problem, string guessing, minimum makespan, and job throughput scheduling.
△ Less
Submitted 1 June, 2025; v1 submitted 30 July, 2024;
originally announced July 2024.
-
Online Bipartite Matching in the Probe-Commit Model
Authors:
Allan Borodin,
Calum MacRury
Abstract:
We consider the classical online bipartite matching problem in the probe-commit model. In this problem, when an online vertex arrives, its edges must be probed to determine if they exist, based on known edge probabilities. A probing algorithm must respect commitment, meaning that if a probed edge exists, it must be used in the matching. Additionally, each online vertex has a patience constraint wh…
▽ More
We consider the classical online bipartite matching problem in the probe-commit model. In this problem, when an online vertex arrives, its edges must be probed to determine if they exist, based on known edge probabilities. A probing algorithm must respect commitment, meaning that if a probed edge exists, it must be used in the matching. Additionally, each online vertex has a patience constraint which limits the number of probes that can be made to an online vertex's adjacent edges. We introduce a new configuration linear program (LP) which we prove is a relaxation of an optimal offline probing algorithm. Using this LP, we establish the following competitive ratios which depend on the model used to generate the instance graph, and the arrival order of its online vertices:
- In the worst-case instance model, an optimal $1/e$ ratio when the vertices arrive in uniformly at random (u.a.r.) order.
- In the known independently distributed (i.d.) instance model, an optimal $1/2$ ratio when the vertices arrive in adversarial order, and a $1-1/e$ ratio when the vertices arrive in u.a.r. order.
The latter two results improve upon the previous best competitive ratio of $0.46$ due to Brubach et al. (Algorithmica 2020), which only held in the more restricted known i.i.d. (independent and identically distributed) instance model. Our $1-1/e$-competitive algorithm matches the best known result for the prophet secretary matching problem due to Ehsani et al. (SODA 2018). Our algorithm is efficient and implies a $1-1/e$ approximation ratio for the special case when the graph is known. This is the offline stochastic matching problem, and we improve upon the $0.42$ approximation ratio for one-sided patience due to Pollner et al. (EC 2022), while also generalizing the $1-1/e$ approximation ratio for unbounded patience due to Gamlath et al. (SODA 2019).
△ Less
Submitted 13 December, 2024; v1 submitted 15 March, 2023;
originally announced March 2023.
-
Any-Order Online Interval Selection
Authors:
Allan Borodin,
Christodoulos Karavasilis
Abstract:
We consider the problem of online interval scheduling on a single machine, where intervals arrive online in an order chosen by an adversary, and the algorithm must output a set of non-conflicting intervals. Traditionally in scheduling theory, it is assumed that intervals arrive in order of increasing start times. We drop that assumption and allow for intervals to arrive in any possible order. We c…
▽ More
We consider the problem of online interval scheduling on a single machine, where intervals arrive online in an order chosen by an adversary, and the algorithm must output a set of non-conflicting intervals. Traditionally in scheduling theory, it is assumed that intervals arrive in order of increasing start times. We drop that assumption and allow for intervals to arrive in any possible order. We call this variant any-order interval selection (AOIS). We assume that some online acceptances can be revoked, but a feasible solution must always be maintained. For unweighted intervals and deterministic algorithms, this problem is unbounded. Under the assumption that there are at most $k$ different interval lengths, we give a simple algorithm that achieves a competitive ratio of $2k$ and show that it is optimal amongst deterministic algorithms, and a restricted class of randomized algorithms we call memoryless, contributing to an open question by Adler and Azar 2003; namely whether a randomized algorithm without access to history can achieve a constant competitive ratio. We connect our model to the problem of call control on the line, and show how the algorithms of Garay et al. 1997 can be applied to our setting, resulting in an optimal algorithm for the case of proportional weights. We also discuss the case of intervals with arbitrary weights, and show how to convert the single-length algorithm of Fung et al. 2014 into a classify and randomly select algorithm that achieves a competitive ratio of 2k. Finally, we consider the case of intervals arriving in a random order, and show that for single-lengthed instances, a one-directional algorithm (i.e. replacing intervals in one direction), is the only deterministic memoryless algorithm that can possibly benefit from random arrivals.
△ Less
Submitted 26 May, 2023; v1 submitted 10 March, 2023;
originally announced March 2023.
-
Prophet Matching Meets Probing with Commitment
Authors:
Allan Borodin,
Calum MacRury,
Akash Rakheja
Abstract:
We consider the online stochastic matching problem for bipartite graphs where edges adjacent to an online node must be probed to determine if they exist, based on known edge probabilities. Our algorithms respect commitment, in that if a probed edge exists, it must be used in the matching. We study this matching problem subject to a downward-closed constraint on each online node's allowable edge pr…
▽ More
We consider the online stochastic matching problem for bipartite graphs where edges adjacent to an online node must be probed to determine if they exist, based on known edge probabilities. Our algorithms respect commitment, in that if a probed edge exists, it must be used in the matching. We study this matching problem subject to a downward-closed constraint on each online node's allowable edge probes. Our setting generalizes the commonly studied patience (or time-out) constraint which limits the number of probes that can be made to an online node's adjacent edges. We introduce a new LP that we prove is a relaxation of an optimal offline probing algorithm (the adaptive benchmark) and which overcomes the limitations of previous LP relaxations.
(1) A tight $\frac{1}{2}$ ratio when the stochastic graph is generated from a known stochastic type graph where the $t^{th}$ online node is drawn independently from a known distribution $\scr{D}_{π(t)}$ and $π$ is chosen adversarially. We refer to this setting as the known i.d. stochastic matching problem with adversarial arrivals.
(2) A $1-1/e$ ratio when the stochastic graph is generated from a known stochastic type graph where the $t^{th}$ online node is drawn independently from a known distribution $\scr{D}_{π(t)}$ and $π$ is a random permutation. We refer to this setting as the known i.d. stochastic matching problem with random order arrivals.
Our results improve upon the previous best competitive ratio of $0.46$ in the known i.i.d. setting against the standard adaptive benchmark. Moreover, we are the first to study the prophet secretary matching problem in the context of probing, where we match the best known classical result.
△ Less
Submitted 29 July, 2021; v1 submitted 8 February, 2021;
originally announced February 2021.
-
Greedy Approaches to Online Stochastic Matching
Authors:
Allan Borodin,
Calum MacRury,
Akash Rakheja
Abstract:
Within the context of stochastic probing with commitment, we consider the online stochastic matching problem; that is, the one-sided online bipartite matching problem where edges adjacent to an online node must be probed to determine if they exist based on edge probabilities that become known when an online vertex arrives. If a probed edge exists, it must be used in the matching (if possible). We…
▽ More
Within the context of stochastic probing with commitment, we consider the online stochastic matching problem; that is, the one-sided online bipartite matching problem where edges adjacent to an online node must be probed to determine if they exist based on edge probabilities that become known when an online vertex arrives. If a probed edge exists, it must be used in the matching (if possible). We consider the competitiveness of online algorithms in both the adversarial order model (AOM) and the random order model (ROM). More specifically, we consider a bipartite stochastic graph $G = (U,V,E)$ where $U$ is the set of offline vertices, $V$ is the set of online vertices and $G$ has edge probabilities $(p_{e})_{e \in E}$ and edge weights $(w_{e})_{e \in E}$. Additionally, $G$ has probing constraints $(\scr{C}_{v})_{v \in V}$, where $\scr{C}_v$ indicates which sequences of edges adjacent to an online vertex $v$ can be probed. We assume that $U$ is known in advance, and that $\scr{C}_v$, together with the edge probabilities and weights adjacent to an online vertex are only revealed when the online vertex arrives. This model generalizes the various settings of the classical bipartite matching problem, and so our main contribution is in making progress towards understanding which classical results extend to the stochastic probing model.
△ Less
Submitted 28 February, 2021; v1 submitted 20 August, 2020;
originally announced August 2020.
-
Bipartite Stochastic Matching: Online, Random Order, and I.I.D. Models
Authors:
Allan Borodin,
Calum MacRury,
Akash Rakheja
Abstract:
Within the context of stochastic probing with commitment, we consider the online stochastic matching problem; that is, the one sided online bipartite matching problem where edges adjacent to an online node must be probed to determine if they exist, based on known edge probabilities. If a probed edge exists, it must be used in the matching (if possible). We study this problem in the generality of a…
▽ More
Within the context of stochastic probing with commitment, we consider the online stochastic matching problem; that is, the one sided online bipartite matching problem where edges adjacent to an online node must be probed to determine if they exist, based on known edge probabilities. If a probed edge exists, it must be used in the matching (if possible). We study this problem in the generality of a patience (or budget) constraint which limits the number of probes that can be made to edges adjacent to an online node. The patience constraint results in modelling and computational efficiency issues that are not encountered in the special cases of unit patience and full (i.e., unlimited) patience. The stochastic matching problem leads to a variety of settings. Our main contribution is to provide a new LP relaxation and a unified approach for establishing new and improved competitive bounds in three different input model settings (namely, adversarial, random order, and known i.i.d.). In all these settings, the algorithm does not have any control on the ordering of the online nodes. We establish competitive bounds in these settings, all of which generalize the standard non-stochastic setting when edges do not need to be probed (i.e., exist with certainty). All of our competitive ratios hold for arbitrary edge probabilities and patience constraints:
(1) A $1-1/e$ ratio when the stochastic graph is known, offline vertices are weighted and online arrivals are adversarial.
(2) A $1-1/e$ ratio when the stochastic graph is known, edges are weighted, and online arrivals are given in random order (i.e., in ROM, the random order model).
(3) A $1-1/e$ ratio when online arrivals are drawn i.i.d. from a known stochastic type graph and edges are weighted.
(4) A (tight) $1/e$ ratio when the stochastic graph is unknown, edges are weighted and online arrivals are given in random order.
△ Less
Submitted 6 January, 2021; v1 submitted 29 April, 2020;
originally announced April 2020.
-
Electronic markets with multiple submodular buyers
Authors:
Allan Borodin,
Akash Rakheja
Abstract:
We discuss the problem of setting prices in an electronic market that has more than one buyer. We assume that there are self-interested sellers each selling a distinct item that has an associated cost. Each buyer has a submodular valuation for purchasing any subset of items. The goal of the sellers is to set a price for their item such that their profit from possibly selling their item to the buye…
▽ More
We discuss the problem of setting prices in an electronic market that has more than one buyer. We assume that there are self-interested sellers each selling a distinct item that has an associated cost. Each buyer has a submodular valuation for purchasing any subset of items. The goal of the sellers is to set a price for their item such that their profit from possibly selling their item to the buyers is maximized. Our most comprehensive results concern a multi copy setting where each seller has m copies of their item and there are m buyers. In this setting, we give a necessary and sufficient condition for the existence of market clearing pure Nash equilibrium. We also show that not all equilibria are market clearing even when this condition is satisfied contrary to what was shown in the case of a single buyer in [2]. Finally, we investigate the pricing problem for multiple buyers in the limited supply setting when each seller only has a single copy of their item.
△ Less
Submitted 23 September, 2019; v1 submitted 27 July, 2019;
originally announced July 2019.
-
An Experimental Study of Algorithms for Online Bipartite Matching
Authors:
Allan Borodin,
Christodoulos Karavasilis,
Denis Pankratov
Abstract:
We perform an experimental study of algorithms for online bipartite matching under the known i.i.d. input model with integral types. In the last decade, there has been substantial effort in designing complex algorithms with the goal of improving worst-case approximation ratios. Our goal is to determine how these algorithms perform on more practical instances rather than worst-case instances. In pa…
▽ More
We perform an experimental study of algorithms for online bipartite matching under the known i.i.d. input model with integral types. In the last decade, there has been substantial effort in designing complex algorithms with the goal of improving worst-case approximation ratios. Our goal is to determine how these algorithms perform on more practical instances rather than worst-case instances. In particular, we are interested in whether the ranking of the algorithms by their worst-case performance is consistent with the ranking of the algorithms by their average-case/practical performance. We are also interested in whether preprocessing times and implementation difficulties that are introduced by these algorithms are justified in practice. To that end we evaluate these algorithms on different random inputs as well as real-life instances obtained from publicly available repositories. We compare these algorithms against several simple greedy-style algorithms. Most of the complex algorithms in the literature are presented as being non-greedy (i.e., an algorithm can intentionally skip matching a node that has available neighbors) to simplify the analysis. Every such algorithm can be turned into a greedy one without hurting its worst-case performance. On our benchmarks, non-greedy versions of these algorithms perform much worse than their greedy versions. Greedy versions perform about as well as the simplest greedy algorithm by itself. This, together with our other findings, suggests that simplest greedy algorithms are competitive with the state-of-the-art worst-case algorithms for online bipartite matching on many average-case and practical input families. Greediness is by far the most important property of online algorithms for bipartite matching.
△ Less
Submitted 14 August, 2018;
originally announced August 2018.
-
Advice Complexity of Priority Algorithms
Authors:
Allan Borodin,
Joan Boyar,
Kim S. Larsen,
Denis Pankratov
Abstract:
The priority model of "greedy-like" algorithms was introduced by Borodin, Nielsen, and Rackoff in 2002. We augment this model by allowing priority algorithms to have access to advice, i.e., side information precomputed by an all-powerful oracle. Obtaining lower bounds in the priority model without advice can be challenging and may involve intricate adversary arguments. Since the priority model wit…
▽ More
The priority model of "greedy-like" algorithms was introduced by Borodin, Nielsen, and Rackoff in 2002. We augment this model by allowing priority algorithms to have access to advice, i.e., side information precomputed by an all-powerful oracle. Obtaining lower bounds in the priority model without advice can be challenging and may involve intricate adversary arguments. Since the priority model with advice is even more powerful, obtaining lower bounds presents additional difficulties. We sidestep these difficulties by developing a general framework of reductions which makes lower bound proofs relatively straightforward and routine. We start by introducing the Pair Matching problem, for which we are able to prove strong lower bounds in the priority model with advice. We develop a template for constructing a reduction from Pair Matching to other problems in the priority model with advice -- this part is technically challenging since the reduction needs to define a valid priority function for Pair Matching while respecting the priority function for the other problem. Finally, we apply the template to obtain lower bounds for a number of standard discrete optimization problems.
△ Less
Submitted 28 July, 2018; v1 submitted 16 June, 2018;
originally announced June 2018.
-
Greedy Bipartite Matching in Random Type Poisson Arrival Model
Authors:
Allan Borodin,
Christodoulos Karavasilis,
Denis Pankratov
Abstract:
We introduce a new random input model for bipartite matching which we call the Random Type Poisson Arrival Model. Just like in the known i.i.d. model (introduced by Feldman et al. 2009), online nodes have types in our model. In contrast to the adversarial types studied in the known i.i.d. model, following the random graphs studied in Mastin and Jaillet 2016, in our model each type graph is generat…
▽ More
We introduce a new random input model for bipartite matching which we call the Random Type Poisson Arrival Model. Just like in the known i.i.d. model (introduced by Feldman et al. 2009), online nodes have types in our model. In contrast to the adversarial types studied in the known i.i.d. model, following the random graphs studied in Mastin and Jaillet 2016, in our model each type graph is generated randomly by including each offline node in the neighborhood of an online node with probability $c/n$ independently. In our model, nodes of the same type appear consecutively in the input and the number of times each type node appears is distributed according to the Poisson distribution with parameter 1. We analyze the performance of the simple greedy algorithm under this input model. The performance is controlled by the parameter $c$ and we are able to exactly characterize the competitive ratio for the regimes $c = o(1)$ and $c = ω(1)$. We also provide a precise bound on the expected size of the matching in the remaining regime of constant $c$. We compare our results to the previous work of Mastin and Jaillet who analyzed the simple greedy algorithm in the $G_{n,n,p}$ model where each online node type occurs exactly once. We essentially show that the approach of Mastin and Jaillet can be extended to work for the Random Type Poisson Arrival Model, although several nontrivial technical challenges need to be overcome. Intuitively, one can view the Random Type Poisson Arrival Model as the $G_{n,n,p}$ model with less randomness; that is, instead of each online node having a new type, each online node has a chance of repeating the previous type.
△ Less
Submitted 1 May, 2018;
originally announced May 2018.
-
Seasonal Goods and Spoiled Milk: Pricing for a Limited Shelf-Life
Authors:
Atiyeh Ashari Ghomi,
Allan Borodin,
Omer Lev
Abstract:
We examine the case of items with a limited shelf-life where storing an item (before consumption) may carry a cost to a buyer (or distributor). For example, eggs, milk, or Groupon coupons have a fixed expiry date, and seasonal goods can suffer a decrease in value. We show how this setting contrasts with recent results by Berbeglia et al (arXiv:1509.07330(v5)) for items with infinite shelf-life.…
▽ More
We examine the case of items with a limited shelf-life where storing an item (before consumption) may carry a cost to a buyer (or distributor). For example, eggs, milk, or Groupon coupons have a fixed expiry date, and seasonal goods can suffer a decrease in value. We show how this setting contrasts with recent results by Berbeglia et al (arXiv:1509.07330(v5)) for items with infinite shelf-life.
We prove tight bounds on the seller's profits showing how they relate to the items' shelf-life. We show, counterintuitively, that in our limited shelf-life setting, increasing storage costs can sometimes lead to less profit for the seller which cannot happen when items have unlimited shelf-life. We also provide an algorithm that calculates optimal prices. Finally, we examine empirically the relationship between profits and buyer utility as the storage cost and shelf-life duration change, and observe properties, some of which are unique to the limited shelf-life setting.
△ Less
Submitted 6 May, 2018; v1 submitted 7 January, 2018;
originally announced January 2018.
-
A Simple PTAS for the Dual Bin Packing Problem and Advice Complexity of Its Online Version
Authors:
Allan Borodin,
Denis Pankratov,
Amirali Salehi-Abari
Abstract:
Recently, Renault (2016) studied the dual bin packing problem in the per-request advice model of online algorithms. He showed that given $O(1/ε)$ advice bits for each input item allows approximating the dual bin packing problem online to within a factor of $1+ε$. Renault asked about the advice complexity of dual bin packing in the tape-advice model of online algorithms. We make progress on this qu…
▽ More
Recently, Renault (2016) studied the dual bin packing problem in the per-request advice model of online algorithms. He showed that given $O(1/ε)$ advice bits for each input item allows approximating the dual bin packing problem online to within a factor of $1+ε$. Renault asked about the advice complexity of dual bin packing in the tape-advice model of online algorithms. We make progress on this question. Let $s$ be the maximum bit size of an input item weight. We present a conceptually simple online algorithm that with total advice $O\left(\frac{s + \log n}{ε^2}\right)$ approximates the dual bin packing to within a $1+ε$ factor. To this end, we describe and analyze a simple offline PTAS for the dual bin packing problem. Although a PTAS for a more general problem was known prior to our work (Kellerer 1999, Chekuri and Khanna 2006), our PTAS is arguably simpler to state and analyze. As a result, we could easily adapt our PTAS to obtain the advice-complexity result.
We also consider whether the dependence on $s$ is necessary in our algorithm. We show that if $s$ is unrestricted then for small enough $ε> 0$ obtaining a $1+ε$ approximation to the dual bin packing requires $Ω_ε(n)$ bits of advice. To establish this lower bound we analyze an online reduction that preserves the advice complexity and approximation ratio from the binary separation problem due to Boyar et al. (2016). We define two natural advice complexity classes that capture the distinction similar to the Turing machine world distinction between pseudo polynomial time algorithms and polynomial time algorithms. Our results on the dual bin packing problem imply the separation of the two classes in the advice complexity world.
△ Less
Submitted 4 August, 2017;
originally announced August 2017.
-
On Conceptually Simple Algorithms for Variants of Online Bipartite Matching
Authors:
Allan Borodin,
Denis Pankratov,
Amirali Salehi-Abari
Abstract:
We present a series of results regarding conceptually simple algorithms for bipartite matching in various online and related models. We first consider a deterministic adversarial model. The best approximation ratio possible for a one-pass deterministic online algorithm is $1/2$, which is achieved by any greedy algorithm. Dürr et al. recently presented a $2$-pass algorithm called Category-Advice th…
▽ More
We present a series of results regarding conceptually simple algorithms for bipartite matching in various online and related models. We first consider a deterministic adversarial model. The best approximation ratio possible for a one-pass deterministic online algorithm is $1/2$, which is achieved by any greedy algorithm. Dürr et al. recently presented a $2$-pass algorithm called Category-Advice that achieves approximation ratio $3/5$. We extend their algorithm to multiple passes. We prove the exact approximation ratio for the $k$-pass Category-Advice algorithm for all $k \ge 1$, and show that the approximation ratio converges to the inverse of the golden ratio $2/(1+\sqrt{5}) \approx 0.618$ as $k$ goes to infinity. The convergence is extremely fast --- the $5$-pass Category-Advice algorithm is already within $0.01\%$ of the inverse of the golden ratio.
We then consider a natural greedy algorithm in the online stochastic IID model---MinDegree. This algorithm is an online version of a well-known and extensively studied offline algorithm MinGreedy. We show that MinDegree cannot achieve an approximation ratio better than $1-1/e$, which is guaranteed by any consistent greedy algorithm in the known IID model.
Finally, following the work in Besser and Poloczek, we depart from an adversarial or stochastic ordering and investigate a natural randomized algorithm (MinRanking) in the priority model. Although the priority model allows the algorithm to choose the input ordering in a general but well defined way, this natural algorithm cannot obtain the approximation of the Ranking algorithm in the ROM model.
△ Less
Submitted 29 June, 2017;
originally announced June 2017.
-
On the limitations of deterministic de-randomizations for online bipartite matching and max-sat
Authors:
Nicolas Pena,
Allan Borodin
Abstract:
The surprising results of Karp, Vazirani and Vazirani and (respectively) Buchbinder et al are examples where rather simple randomizations provide provably better approximations than the corresponding deterministic counterparts for online bipartite matching and (respectively) unconstrained non-monotone submodular maximization. We show that seemingly strong extensions of the deterministic online com…
▽ More
The surprising results of Karp, Vazirani and Vazirani and (respectively) Buchbinder et al are examples where rather simple randomizations provide provably better approximations than the corresponding deterministic counterparts for online bipartite matching and (respectively) unconstrained non-monotone submodular maximization. We show that seemingly strong extensions of the deterministic online computation model can at best match the performance of naive randomization. More specifically, for bipartite matching, we show that in the priority model (allowing very general ways to order the input stream), we cannot improve upon the trivial 1/2-approximation achieved by any greedy maximal matching algorithm and likewise cannot improve upon this approximation by any log n/log log n number of online algorithms running in parallel. The latter result yields an improved log log n - log log log n lower bound for the number of advice bits needed. For max-sat, we adapt the recent de-randomization approach of Buchbinder and Feldman applied to the Buchbinbder et al algorithm for max-sat to obtain a deterministic 3/4-approximation algorithm using width 2n parallelism. In order to improve upon this approximation, we show that exponential width parallelism of online algorithms is necessary (in a model that is more general than what is needed for the width 2n algorithm).
△ Less
Submitted 10 August, 2016;
originally announced August 2016.
-
Budgetary Effects on Pricing Equilibrium in Online Markets
Authors:
Allan Borodin,
Omer Lev,
Tyrone Strangway
Abstract:
Following the work of Babaioff et al, we consider the pricing game with strategic vendors and a single buyer, modeling a scenario in which multiple competing vendors have very good knowledge of a buyer, as is common in online markets. We add to this model the realistic assumption that the buyer has a fixed budget and does not have unlimited funds. When the buyer's valuation function is additive, w…
▽ More
Following the work of Babaioff et al, we consider the pricing game with strategic vendors and a single buyer, modeling a scenario in which multiple competing vendors have very good knowledge of a buyer, as is common in online markets. We add to this model the realistic assumption that the buyer has a fixed budget and does not have unlimited funds. When the buyer's valuation function is additive, we are able to completely characterize the different possible pure Nash Equilibria (PNE) and in particular obtain a necessary and sufficient condition for uniqueness. Furthermore, we characterize the market clearing (or Walresian) equilibria for all submodular valuations.
Surprisingly, for certain monotone submodular function valuations, we show that the pure NE can exhibit some counterintuitive phenomena; namely, there is a valuation such that the pricing will be market clearing and within budget if the buyer does not reveal the budget but will result in a smaller set of allocated items (and higher prices for items) if the buyer does reveal the budget. It is also the case that the conditions that guarantee market clearing in Babaioff et al for submodular functions are not necessarily market clearing when there is a budget. Furthermore, with respect to social welfare, while without budgets all equilibria are optimal (i.e. POA = POS = 1), we show that with budgets the worst equilibrium may only achieve 1/(n-2) of the best equilibrium.
△ Less
Submitted 8 February, 2016; v1 submitted 21 November, 2015;
originally announced November 2015.
-
Sequential Posted Price Mechanisms with Correlated Valuations
Authors:
Marek Adamczyk,
Allan Borodin,
Diodato Ferraioli,
Bart de Keijzer,
Stefano Leonardi
Abstract:
We study the revenue performance of sequential posted price mechanisms and some natural extensions, for a general setting where the valuations of the buyers are drawn from a correlated distribution. Sequential posted price mechanisms are conceptually simple mechanisms that work by proposing a take-it-or-leave-it offer to each buyer. We apply sequential posted price mechanisms to single-parameter m…
▽ More
We study the revenue performance of sequential posted price mechanisms and some natural extensions, for a general setting where the valuations of the buyers are drawn from a correlated distribution. Sequential posted price mechanisms are conceptually simple mechanisms that work by proposing a take-it-or-leave-it offer to each buyer. We apply sequential posted price mechanisms to single-parameter multi-unit settings in which each buyer demands only one item and the mechanism can assign the service to at most k of the buyers. For standard sequential posted price mechanisms, we prove that with the valuation distribution having finite support, no sequential posted price mechanism can extract a constant fraction of the optimal expected revenue, even with unlimited supply. We extend this result to the the case of a continuous valuation distribution when various standard assumptions hold simultaneously. In fact, it turns out that the best fraction of the optimal revenue that is extractable by a sequential posted price mechanism is proportional to ratio of the highest and lowest possible valuation. We prove that for two simple generalizations of these mechanisms, a better revenue performance can be achieved: if the sequential posted price mechanism has for each buyer the option of either proposing an offer or asking the buyer for its valuation, then a Omega(1/max{1,d}) fraction of the optimal revenue can be extracted, where d denotes the degree of dependence of the valuations, ranging from complete independence (d=0) to arbitrary dependence (d=n-1). Moreover, when we generalize the sequential posted price mechanisms further, such that the mechanism has the ability to make a take-it-or-leave-it offer to the i-th buyer that depends on the valuations of all buyers except i's, we prove that a constant fraction (2-sqrt{e})/4~0.088 of the optimal revenue can be always be extracted.
△ Less
Submitted 1 October, 2015; v1 submitted 7 March, 2015;
originally announced March 2015.
-
Weakly Submodular Functions
Authors:
Allan Borodin,
Dai Tri Man Le,
Yuli Ye
Abstract:
Submodular functions are well-studied in combinatorial optimization, game theory and economics. The natural diminishing returns property makes them suitable for many applications. We study an extension of monotone submodular functions, which we call {\em weakly submodular functions}. Our extension includes some (mildly) supermodular functions. We show that several natural functions belong to this…
▽ More
Submodular functions are well-studied in combinatorial optimization, game theory and economics. The natural diminishing returns property makes them suitable for many applications. We study an extension of monotone submodular functions, which we call {\em weakly submodular functions}. Our extension includes some (mildly) supermodular functions. We show that several natural functions belong to this class and relate our class to some other recent submodular function extensions.
We consider the optimization problem of maximizing a weakly submodular function subject to uniform and general matroid constraints. For a uniform matroid constraint, the "standard greedy algorithm" achieves a constant approximation ratio where the constant (experimentally) converges to 5.95 as the cardinality constraint increases. For a general matroid constraint, a simple local search algorithm achieves a constant approximation ratio where the constant (analytically) converges to 10.22 as the rank of the matroid increases.
△ Less
Submitted 16 November, 2014; v1 submitted 26 January, 2014;
originally announced January 2014.
-
Bounds on Double-Sided Myopic Algorithms for Unconstrained Non-monotone Submodular Maximization
Authors:
Norman Huang,
Allan Borodin
Abstract:
Unconstrained submodular maximization captures many NP-hard combinatorial optimization problems, including Max-Cut, Max-Di-Cut, and variants of facility location problems. Recently, Buchbinder et al. presented a surprisingly simple linear time randomized greedy-like online algorithm that achieves a constant approximation ratio of 1/2, matching optimally the hardness result of Feige et al.. Motivat…
▽ More
Unconstrained submodular maximization captures many NP-hard combinatorial optimization problems, including Max-Cut, Max-Di-Cut, and variants of facility location problems. Recently, Buchbinder et al. presented a surprisingly simple linear time randomized greedy-like online algorithm that achieves a constant approximation ratio of 1/2, matching optimally the hardness result of Feige et al.. Motivated by the algorithm of Buchbinder et al., we introduce a precise algorithmic model called double-sided myopic algorithms. We show that while the algorithm of Buchbinder et al. can be realized as a randomized online double-sided myopic algorithm, no such deterministic algorithm, even with adaptive ordering, can achieve the same approximation ratio. With respect to the Max-Di-Cut problem, we relate the Buchbinder et al. algorithm and our myopic framework to the online algorithm and inapproximation of Bar-Noy and Lampis.
△ Less
Submitted 24 April, 2014; v1 submitted 7 December, 2013;
originally announced December 2013.
-
Max-Sum Diversification, Monotone Submodular Functions and Dynamic Updates
Authors:
Allan Borodin,
Aadhar Jain,
Hyun Chul Lee,
Yuli Ye
Abstract:
Result diversification is an important aspect in web-based search, document summarization, facility location, portfolio management and other applications. Given a set of ranked results for a set of objects (e.g. web documents, facilities, etc.) with a distance between any pair, the goal is to select a subset $S$ satisfying the following three criteria: (a) the subset $S$ satisfies some constraint…
▽ More
Result diversification is an important aspect in web-based search, document summarization, facility location, portfolio management and other applications. Given a set of ranked results for a set of objects (e.g. web documents, facilities, etc.) with a distance between any pair, the goal is to select a subset $S$ satisfying the following three criteria: (a) the subset $S$ satisfies some constraint (e.g. bounded cardinality); (b) the subset contains results of high "quality"; and (c) the subset contains results that are "diverse" relative to the distance measure. The goal of result diversification is to produce a diversified subset while maintaining high quality as much as possible. We study a broad class of problems where the distances are a metric, where the constraint is given by independence in a matroid, where quality is determined by a monotone submodular function, and diversity is defined as the sum of distances between objects in $S$. Our problem is a generalization of the {\em max sum diversification} problem studied in \cite{GoSh09} which in turn is a generaliztion of the {\em max sum $p$-dispersion problem} studied extensively in location theory. It is NP-hard even with the triangle inequality. We propose two simple and natural algorithms: a greedy algorithm for a cardinality constraint and a local search algorithm for an arbitary matroid constraint. We prove that both algorithms achieve constant approximation ratios.
△ Less
Submitted 24 November, 2016; v1 submitted 28 March, 2012;
originally announced March 2012.
-
Truthful Mechanisms for Competing Submodular Processes
Authors:
Allan Borodin,
Mark Braverman,
Brendan Lucier,
Joel Oren
Abstract:
Motivated by applications to word-of-mouth advertising, we consider a game-theoretic scenario in which competing advertisers want to target initial adopters in a social network. Each advertiser wishes to maximize the resulting cascade of influence, modeled by a general network diffusion process. However, competition between products may adversely impact the rate of adoption for any given firm. The…
▽ More
Motivated by applications to word-of-mouth advertising, we consider a game-theoretic scenario in which competing advertisers want to target initial adopters in a social network. Each advertiser wishes to maximize the resulting cascade of influence, modeled by a general network diffusion process. However, competition between products may adversely impact the rate of adoption for any given firm. The resulting framework gives rise to complex preferences that depend on the specifics of the stochastic diffusion model and the network topology.
We study this model from the perspective of a central mechanism, such as a social networking platform, that can optimize seed placement as a service for the advertisers. We ask: given the reported demands of the competing firms, how should a mechanism choose seeds to maximize overall efficiency? Beyond the algorithmic problem, competition raises issues of strategic behaviour: rational agents should not be incentivized to underreport their budget demands.
We show that when there are two players, the social welfare can be $2$-approximated by a polynomial-time strategyproof mechanism. Our mechanism is defined recursively, randomizing the order in which advertisers are allocated seeds according to a particular greedy method. For three or more players, we demonstrate that under additional assumptions (satisfied by many existing models of influence spread) there exists a simpler strategyproof $\frac{e}{e-1}$-approximation mechanism; notably, this second mechanism is not necessarily strategyproof when there are only two players.
△ Less
Submitted 25 March, 2014; v1 submitted 9 February, 2012;
originally announced February 2012.
-
Can We Learn to Beat the Best Stock
Authors:
A. Borodin,
R. El-Yaniv,
V. Gogan
Abstract:
A novel algorithm for actively trading stocks is presented. While traditional expert advice and "universal" algorithms (as well as standard technical trading heuristics) attempt to predict winners or trends, our approach relies on predictable statistical relations between all pairs of stocks in the market. Our empirical results on historical markets provide strong evidence that this type of techni…
▽ More
A novel algorithm for actively trading stocks is presented. While traditional expert advice and "universal" algorithms (as well as standard technical trading heuristics) attempt to predict winners or trends, our approach relies on predictable statistical relations between all pairs of stocks in the market. Our empirical results on historical markets provide strong evidence that this type of technical trading can "beat the market" and moreover, can beat the best stock in the market. In doing so we utilize a new idea for smoothing critical parameters in the context of expert learning.
△ Less
Submitted 30 June, 2011;
originally announced July 2011.
-
Price of Anarchy for Greedy Auctions
Authors:
Brendan Lucier,
Allan Borodin
Abstract:
We consider auctions in which greedy algorithms, paired with first-price or critical-price payment rules, are used to resolve multi-parameter combinatorial allocation problems. We study the price of anarchy for social welfare in such auctions. We show for a variety of equilibrium concepts, including Bayes-Nash equilibrium and correlated equilibrium, the resulting price of anarchy bound is close to…
▽ More
We consider auctions in which greedy algorithms, paired with first-price or critical-price payment rules, are used to resolve multi-parameter combinatorial allocation problems. We study the price of anarchy for social welfare in such auctions. We show for a variety of equilibrium concepts, including Bayes-Nash equilibrium and correlated equilibrium, the resulting price of anarchy bound is close to the approximation factor of the underlying greedy algorithm.
△ Less
Submitted 30 November, 2014; v1 submitted 4 September, 2009;
originally announced September 2009.
