A large-scale heterogeneous 3D magnetic resonance brain imaging dataset for self-supervised learning
Authors:
Asbjørn Munk,
Stefano Cerri,
Jakob Ambsdorf,
Julia Machnio,
Sebastian Nørgaard Llambias,
Vardan Nersesjan,
Christian Hedeager Krag,
Peirong Liu,
Pablo Rocamora García,
Mostafa Mehdipour Ghazi,
Mikael Boesen,
Michael Eriksen Benros,
Juan Eugenio Iglesias,
Mads Nielsen
Abstract:
We present FOMO60K, a large-scale, heterogeneous dataset of 60,529 brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scans from 13,900 sessions and 11,187 subjects, aggregated from 16 publicly available sources. The dataset includes both clinical- and research-grade images, multiple MRI sequences, and a wide range of anatomical and pathological variability, including scans with large brain anomalies. Minimal…
▽ More
We present FOMO60K, a large-scale, heterogeneous dataset of 60,529 brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scans from 13,900 sessions and 11,187 subjects, aggregated from 16 publicly available sources. The dataset includes both clinical- and research-grade images, multiple MRI sequences, and a wide range of anatomical and pathological variability, including scans with large brain anomalies. Minimal preprocessing was applied to preserve the original image characteristics while reducing barriers to entry for new users. Accompanying code for self-supervised pretraining and finetuning is provided. FOMO60K is intended to support the development and benchmarking of self-supervised learning methods in medical imaging at scale.
△ Less
Submitted 17 June, 2025;
originally announced June 2025.
Handling Open Research Data within the Max Planck Society -- Looking Closer at the Year 2020
Authors:
Martin Boosen,
Michael Franke,
Yves Vincent Grossmann,
Sy Dat Ho,
Larissa Leiminger,
Jan Matthiesen
Abstract:
This paper analyses the practice of publishing research data within the Max Planck Society in the year 2020. The central finding of the study is that up to 40\% of the empirical text publications had research data available. The aggregation of the available data is predominantly analysed. There are differences between the sections of the Max Planck Society but they are not as great as one might ex…
▽ More
This paper analyses the practice of publishing research data within the Max Planck Society in the year 2020. The central finding of the study is that up to 40\% of the empirical text publications had research data available. The aggregation of the available data is predominantly analysed. There are differences between the sections of the Max Planck Society but they are not as great as one might expect. In the case of the journals, it is also apparent that a data policy can increase the availability of data related to textual publications. Finally, we found that the statement on data availability "upon (reasonable) request" does not work.
△ Less
Submitted 28 February, 2024;
originally announced February 2024.
