-
Fine-Grained Complexity of Computing Degree-Constrained Spanning Trees
Authors:
Narek Bojikian,
Alexander Firbas,
Robert Ganian,
Hung P. Hoang,
Krisztina Szilágyi
Abstract:
We investigate the computation of minimum-cost spanning trees satisfying prescribed vertex degree constraints: Given a graph $G$ and a constraint function $D$, we ask for a (minimum-cost) spanning tree $T$ such that for each vertex $v$, $T$ achieves a degree specified by $D(v)$. Specifically, we consider three kinds of constraint functions ordered by their generality -- $D$ may either assign each…
▽ More
We investigate the computation of minimum-cost spanning trees satisfying prescribed vertex degree constraints: Given a graph $G$ and a constraint function $D$, we ask for a (minimum-cost) spanning tree $T$ such that for each vertex $v$, $T$ achieves a degree specified by $D(v)$. Specifically, we consider three kinds of constraint functions ordered by their generality -- $D$ may either assign each vertex to a list of admissible degrees, an upper bound on the degrees, or a specific degree. Using a combination of novel techniques and state-of-the-art machinery, we obtain an almost-complete overview of the fine-grained complexity of these problems taking into account the most classical graph parameters of the input graph $G$. In particular, we present SETH-tight upper and lower bounds for these problems when parameterized by the pathwidth and cutwidth, an ETH-tight algorithm parameterized by the cliquewidth, and a nearly SETH-tight algorithm parameterized by treewidth.
△ Less
Submitted 19 March, 2025;
originally announced March 2025.
-
Tight Bounds for some Classical Problems Parameterized by Cutwidth
Authors:
Narek Bojikian,
Vera Chekan,
Stefan Kratsch
Abstract:
Cutwidth is a widely studied parameter that quantifies how well a graph can be decomposed along small edge-cuts. It complements pathwidth, which captures decomposition by small vertex separators, and it is well-known that cutwidth upper-bounds pathwidth. The SETH-tight parameterized complexity of problems on graphs of bounded pathwidth (and treewidth) has been actively studied over the past decade…
▽ More
Cutwidth is a widely studied parameter that quantifies how well a graph can be decomposed along small edge-cuts. It complements pathwidth, which captures decomposition by small vertex separators, and it is well-known that cutwidth upper-bounds pathwidth. The SETH-tight parameterized complexity of problems on graphs of bounded pathwidth (and treewidth) has been actively studied over the past decade while for cutwidth the complexity of many classical problems remained open.
For Hamiltonian Cycle, it is known that a $(2+\sqrt{2})^{\operatorname{pw}} n^{O(1)}$ algorithm is optimal for pathwidth under SETH~[Cygan et al.\ JACM 2022]. Van Geffen et al.~[J.\ Graph Algorithms Appl.\ 2020] and Bojikian et al.~[STACS 2023] asked which running time is optimal for this problem parameterized by cutwidth. We answer this question with $(1+\sqrt{2})^{\operatorname{ctw}} n^{O(1)}$ by providing matching upper and lower bounds. Second, as our main technical contribution, we close the gap left by van Heck~[2018] for Partition Into Triangles (and Triangle Packing) by improving both upper and lower bound and getting a tight bound of $\sqrt[3]{3}^{\operatorname{ctw}} n^{O(1)}$, which to our knowledge exhibits the only known tight non-integral basis apart from Hamiltonian Cycle. We show that cuts inducing a disjoint union of paths of length three (unions of so-called $Z$-cuts) lie at the core of the complexity of the problem -- usually lower-bound constructions use simpler cuts inducing either a matching or a disjoint union of bicliques. Finally, we determine the optimal running times for Max Cut ($2^{\operatorname{ctw}} n^{O(1)}$) and Induced Matching ($3^{\operatorname{ctw}} n^{O(1)}$) by providing matching lower bounds for the existing algorithms -- the latter result also answers an open question for treewidth by Chaudhary and Zehavi~[WG 2023].
△ Less
Submitted 21 February, 2025;
originally announced February 2025.
-
Tight Algorithm for Connected Odd Cycle Transversal Parameterized by Clique-width
Authors:
Narek Bojikian,
Stefan Kratsch
Abstract:
Recently, Bojikian and Kratsch [2023] have presented a novel approach to tackle connectivity problems parameterized by clique-width ($\operatorname{cw}$), based on counting small representations of partial solutions (modulo two). Using this technique, they were able to get a tight bound for the Steiner Tree problem, answering an open question posed by Hegerfeld and Kratsch [ESA, 2023]. We use the…
▽ More
Recently, Bojikian and Kratsch [2023] have presented a novel approach to tackle connectivity problems parameterized by clique-width ($\operatorname{cw}$), based on counting small representations of partial solutions (modulo two). Using this technique, they were able to get a tight bound for the Steiner Tree problem, answering an open question posed by Hegerfeld and Kratsch [ESA, 2023]. We use the same technique to solve the Connected Odd Cycle Transversal problem in time $\mathcal{O}^*(12^{\operatorname{cw}})$. We define a new representation of partial solutions by separating the connectivity requirement from the 2-colorability requirement of this problem. Moreover, we prove that our result is tight by providing SETH-based lower bound excluding algorithms with running time $\mathcal{O}^*((12-ε)^{\operatorname{lcw}})$ even when parameterized by linear clique-width. This answers the second question posed by Hegerfeld and Kratsch in the same paper.
△ Less
Submitted 26 February, 2024; v1 submitted 12 February, 2024;
originally announced February 2024.
-
A tight Monte-Carlo algorithm for Steiner Tree parameterized by clique-width
Authors:
Narek Bojikian,
Stefan Kratsch
Abstract:
Recently, Hegerfeld and Kratsch [ESA 2023] obtained the first tight algorithmic results for hard connectivity problems parameterized by clique-width. Concretely, they gave one-sided error Monte-Carlo algorithms that given a $k$-clique-expression solve Connected Vertex Cover in time $6^kn^{O(1)}$ and Connected Dominating Set in time $5^kn^{O(1)}$. Moreover, under the Strong Exponential-Time Hypothe…
▽ More
Recently, Hegerfeld and Kratsch [ESA 2023] obtained the first tight algorithmic results for hard connectivity problems parameterized by clique-width. Concretely, they gave one-sided error Monte-Carlo algorithms that given a $k$-clique-expression solve Connected Vertex Cover in time $6^kn^{O(1)}$ and Connected Dominating Set in time $5^kn^{O(1)}$. Moreover, under the Strong Exponential-Time Hypothesis (SETH) these results were showed to be tight. However, they leave open several important benchmark problems, whose complexity relative to treewidth had been settled by Cygan et al. [SODA 2011 & TALG 2018]. Among which is the Steiner Tree problem. As a key obstruction they point out the exponential gap between the rank of certain compatibility matrices, which is often used for algorithms, and the largest triangular submatrix therein, which is essential for current lower bound methods. Concretely, for Steiner Tree the $GF(2)$-rank is $4^k$, while no triangular submatrix larger than $3^k$ was known. This yields time $4^kn^{O(1)}$, while the obtainable impossibility of time $(3-\varepsilon)^kn^{O(1)}$ under SETH was already known relative to pathwidth.
We close this gap by showing that Steiner Tree can be solved in time $3^kn^{O(1)}$ given a $k$-clique-expression. Hence, for all parameters between cutwidth and clique-width it has the same tight complexity. We first show that there is a ``representative submatrix'' of GF(2)-rank $3^k$ (ruling out larger triangular submatrices). At first glance, this only allows to count (modulo 2) the number of representations of valid solutions, but not the number of solutions (even if a unique solution exists). We show how to overcome this problem by isolating a unique representative of a unique solution, if one exists. We believe that our approach will be instrumental for settling further open problems in this research program.
△ Less
Submitted 26 February, 2024; v1 submitted 26 July, 2023;
originally announced July 2023.
-
Tight Bounds for Connectivity Problems Parameterized by Cutwidth
Authors:
Narek Bojikian,
Vera Chekan,
Falko Hegerfeld,
Stefan Kratsch
Abstract:
In this work we start the investigation of tight complexity bounds for connectivity problems parameterized by cutwidth assuming the Strong Exponential-Time Hypothesis (SETH). Van Geffen et al. posed this question for odd cycle transversal and feedback vertex set. We answer it for these two and four further problems, namely connected vertex cover, connected domintaing set, steiner tree, and connect…
▽ More
In this work we start the investigation of tight complexity bounds for connectivity problems parameterized by cutwidth assuming the Strong Exponential-Time Hypothesis (SETH). Van Geffen et al. posed this question for odd cycle transversal and feedback vertex set. We answer it for these two and four further problems, namely connected vertex cover, connected domintaing set, steiner tree, and connected odd cycle transversal. For the latter two problems it sufficed to prove lower bounds that match the running time inherited from parameterization by treewidth; for the others we provide faster algorithms than relative to treewidth and prove matching lower bounds. For upper bounds we first extend the idea of Groenland et al.~[STACS~2022] to solve what we call coloring-like problem. Such problems are defined by a symmetric matrix $M$ over $\mathbb{F}_2$ indexed by a set of colors. The goal is to count the number (modulo some prime $p$) of colorings of a graph such that $M$ has a $1$-entry if indexed by the colors of the end-points of any edge. We show that this problem can be solved faster if $M$ has small rank over $\mathbb{F}_p$. We apply this result to get our upper bounds for connected vertex cover and connected dominating set. The upper bounds for odd cycle transversal and feedback vertex set use a subdivision trick to get below the bounds that matrix rank would yield.
△ Less
Submitted 23 December, 2022;
originally announced December 2022.
