Showing 1–14 of 14 results for author: Biere, A

SAT Solving for Variants of First-Order Subsumption

Authors: Robin Coutelier, Jakob Rath, Michael Rawson, Armin Biere, Laura Kovács

Abstract: Automated reasoners, such as SAT/SMT solvers and first-order provers, are becoming the backbones of rigorous systems engineering, being used for example in applications of system verification, program synthesis, and cybersecurity. Automation in these domains crucially depends on the efficiency of the underlying reasoners towards finding proofs and/or counterexamples of the task to be enforced. In… ▽ More Automated reasoners, such as SAT/SMT solvers and first-order provers, are becoming the backbones of rigorous systems engineering, being used for example in applications of system verification, program synthesis, and cybersecurity. Automation in these domains crucially depends on the efficiency of the underlying reasoners towards finding proofs and/or counterexamples of the task to be enforced. In order to gain efficiency, automated reasoners use dedicated proof rules to keep proof search tractable. To this end, (variants of) subsumption is one of the most important proof rules used by automated reasoners, ranging from SAT solvers to first-order theorem provers and beyond. It is common that millions of subsumption checks are performed during proof search, necessitating efficient implementations. However, in contrast to propositional subsumption as used by SAT solvers and implemented using sophisticated polynomial algorithms, first-order subsumption in first-order theorem provers involves NP-complete search queries, turning the efficient use of first-order subsumption into a huge practical burden. In this paper we argue that the integration of a dedicated SAT solver opens up new venues for efficient implementations of first-order subsumption and related rules. We show that, by using a flexible learning approach to choose between various SAT encodings of subsumption variants, we greatly improve the scalability of first-order theorem proving. Our experimental results demonstrate that, by using a tailored SAT solver within first-order reasoning, we gain a large speedup in solving state-of-the-art benchmarks. △ Less

Submitted 20 December, 2024; originally announced December 2024.

Journal ref: Formal Methods in System Design (2024)

Disjoint Projected Enumeration for SAT and SMT without Blocking Clauses

Authors: Giuseppe Spallitta, Roberto Sebastiani, Armin Biere

Abstract: All-Solution Satisfiability (AllSAT) and its extension, All-Solution Satisfiability Modulo Theories (AllSMT), have become more relevant in recent years, mainly in formal verification and artificial intelligence applications. The goal of these problems is the enumeration of all satisfying assignments of a formula (for SAT and SMT problems, respectively), making them useful for test generation, mode… ▽ More All-Solution Satisfiability (AllSAT) and its extension, All-Solution Satisfiability Modulo Theories (AllSMT), have become more relevant in recent years, mainly in formal verification and artificial intelligence applications. The goal of these problems is the enumeration of all satisfying assignments of a formula (for SAT and SMT problems, respectively), making them useful for test generation, model checking, and probabilistic inference. Nevertheless, traditional AllSAT algorithms face significant computational challenges due to the exponential growth of the search space and inefficiencies caused by blocking clauses, which cause memory blowups and degrade unit propagation performances in the long term. This paper presents two novel solvers: tabularAllSAT, a projected AllSAT solver, and tabularAllSMT, a projected AllSMT solver. Both solvers combine Conflict-Driven Clause Learning (CDCL) with chronological backtracking to improve efficiency while ensuring disjoint enumeration. To retrieve compact partial assignments we propose a novel aggressive implicant shrinking algorithm, compatible with chronological backtracking, to minimize the number of partial assignments, reducing overall search complexity. Furthermore, we extend the solver framework to handle projected enumeration and SMT formulas effectively and efficiently, adapting the baseline framework to integrate theory reasoning and the distinction between important and non-important variables. An extensive experimental evaluation demonstrates the superiority of our approach compared to state-of-the-art solvers, particularly in scenarios requiring projection and SMT-based reasoning. △ Less

Submitted 21 November, 2024; v1 submitted 22 October, 2024; originally announced October 2024.

Comments: arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:2306.00461 extended journal version of arXiv:2306.00461

Dynamic Blocked Clause Elimination for Projected Model Counting

Authors: Jean-Marie Lagniez, Pierre Marquis, Armin Biere

Abstract: In this paper, we explore the application of blocked clause elimination for projected model counting. This is the problem of determining the number of models ||\exists X.Σ|| of a propositional formula Σ after eliminating a given set X of variables existentially. Although blocked clause elimination is a well-known technique for SAT solving, its direct application to model counting is challenging as… ▽ More In this paper, we explore the application of blocked clause elimination for projected model counting. This is the problem of determining the number of models ||\exists X.Σ|| of a propositional formula Σ after eliminating a given set X of variables existentially. Although blocked clause elimination is a well-known technique for SAT solving, its direct application to model counting is challenging as in general it changes the number of models. However, we demonstrate, by focusing on projected variables during the blocked clause search, that blocked clause elimination can be leveraged while preserving the correct model count. To take advantage of blocked clause elimination in an efficient way during model counting, a novel data structure and associated algorithms are introduced. Our proposed approach is implemented in the model counter d4. Our experiments demonstrate the computational benefits of our new method of blocked clause elimination for projected model counting. △ Less

Submitted 12 August, 2024; originally announced August 2024.

Comments: LIPIcs, Volume 305, SAT 2024

Certifying Phase Abstraction

Authors: Nils Froleyks, Emily Yu, Armin Biere, Keijo Heljanko

Abstract: Certification helps to increase trust in formal verification of safety-critical systems which require assurance on their correctness. In hardware model checking, a widely used formal verification technique, phase abstraction is considered one of the most commonly used preprocessing techniques. We present an approach to certify an extended form of phase abstraction using a generic certificate forma… ▽ More Certification helps to increase trust in formal verification of safety-critical systems which require assurance on their correctness. In hardware model checking, a widely used formal verification technique, phase abstraction is considered one of the most commonly used preprocessing techniques. We present an approach to certify an extended form of phase abstraction using a generic certificate format. As in earlier works our approach involves constructing a witness circuit with an inductive invariant property that certifies the correctness of the entire model checking process, which is then validated by an independent certificate checker. We have implemented and evaluated the proposed approach including certification for various preprocessing configurations on hardware model checking competition benchmarks. As an improvement on previous work in this area, the proposed method is able to efficiently complete certification with an overhead of a fraction of model checking time. △ Less

Submitted 7 May, 2024; originally announced May 2024.

Disjoint Partial Enumeration without Blocking Clauses

Authors: Giuseppe Spallitta, Roberto Sebastiani, Armin Biere

Abstract: A basic algorithm for enumerating disjoint propositional models (disjoint AllSAT) is based on adding blocking clauses incrementally, ruling out previously found models. On the one hand, blocking clauses have the potential to reduce the number of generated models exponentially, as they can handle partial models. On the other hand, the introduction of a large number of blocking clauses affects memor… ▽ More A basic algorithm for enumerating disjoint propositional models (disjoint AllSAT) is based on adding blocking clauses incrementally, ruling out previously found models. On the one hand, blocking clauses have the potential to reduce the number of generated models exponentially, as they can handle partial models. On the other hand, the introduction of a large number of blocking clauses affects memory consumption and drastically slows down unit propagation. We propose a new approach that allows for enumerating disjoint partial models with no need for blocking clauses by integrating: Conflict-Driven Clause-Learning (CDCL), Chronological Backtracking (CB), and methods for shrinking models (Implicant Shrinking). Experiments clearly show the benefits of our novel approach. △ Less

Submitted 9 January, 2024; v1 submitted 1 June, 2023; originally announced June 2023.

Stratified Certification for k-Induction

Authors: Emily Yu, Nils Froleyks, Armin Biere, Keijo Heljanko

Abstract: Our recently proposed certification framework for bit-level k-induction-based model checking has been shown to be quite effective in increasing the trust of verification results even though it partially involved quantifier reasoning. In this paper we show how to simplify the approach by assuming reset functions to be stratified. This way it can be lifted to word-level and in principle to other the… ▽ More Our recently proposed certification framework for bit-level k-induction-based model checking has been shown to be quite effective in increasing the trust of verification results even though it partially involved quantifier reasoning. In this paper we show how to simplify the approach by assuming reset functions to be stratified. This way it can be lifted to word-level and in principle to other theories where quantifier reasoning is difficult. Our new method requires six simple SAT checks and one polynomial-time check, allowing certification to remain in co-NP while the previous approach required five SAT checks and one QBF check. Experimental results show a substantial performance gain for our new approach. Finally, we present and evaluate our new tool Certifaiger-wl which is able to certify k-induction-based word-level model checking. △ Less

Submitted 2 August, 2022; originally announced August 2022.

Scalable Proof Producing Multi-Threaded SAT Solving with Gimsatul through Sharing instead of Copying Clauses

Authors: Mathias Fleury, Armin Biere

Abstract: We give a first account of our new parallel SAT solver Gimsatul. Its key feature is to share clauses physically in memory instead of copying them, which is the method of other state-of-the-art multi-threaded SAT solvers to exchange clauses logically. Our approach keeps information about which literals are watched in a clause local to a solving thread but shares the actual immutable literals of a c… ▽ More We give a first account of our new parallel SAT solver Gimsatul. Its key feature is to share clauses physically in memory instead of copying them, which is the method of other state-of-the-art multi-threaded SAT solvers to exchange clauses logically. Our approach keeps information about which literals are watched in a clause local to a solving thread but shares the actual immutable literals of a clause globally among all solving threads. This design gives quite remarkable parallel scalability, allows aggressive clause sharing while keeping memory usage low and produces more compact proofs. △ Less

Submitted 29 July, 2022; v1 submitted 27 July, 2022; originally announced July 2022.

Comments: Accepted at the Pragmatics of SAT workshop http://www.pragmaticsofsat.org/2022/

On Enumerating Short Projected Models

Authors: Sibylle Möhle, Roberto Sebastiani, Armin Biere

Abstract: Propositional model enumeration, or All-SAT, is the task to record all models of a propositional formula. It is a key task in software and hardware verification, system engineering, and predicate abstraction, to mention a few. It also provides a means to convert a CNF formula into DNF, which is relevant in circuit design. While in some applications enumerating models multiple times causes no harm,… ▽ More Propositional model enumeration, or All-SAT, is the task to record all models of a propositional formula. It is a key task in software and hardware verification, system engineering, and predicate abstraction, to mention a few. It also provides a means to convert a CNF formula into DNF, which is relevant in circuit design. While in some applications enumerating models multiple times causes no harm, in others avoiding repetitions is crucial. We therefore present two model enumeration algorithms, which adopt dual reasoning in order to shorten the found models. The first method enumerates pairwise contradicting models. Repetitions are avoided by the use of so-called blocking clauses, for which we provide a dual encoding. In our second approach we relax the uniqueness constraint. We present an adaptation of the standard conflict-driven clause learning procedure to support model enumeration without blocking clauses.Our procedures are expressed by means of a calculus and proofs of correctness are provided. △ Less

Submitted 12 November, 2024; v1 submitted 22 October, 2021; originally announced October 2021.

Revisiting Decision Diagrams for SAT

Authors: Tom van Dijk, Rüdiger Ehlers, Armin Biere

Abstract: Symbolic variants of clause distribution using decision diagrams to eliminate variables in SAT were shown to perform well on hard combinatorial instances. In this paper we revisit both existing ZDD and BDD variants of this approach. We further investigate different heuristics for selecting the next variable to eliminate. Our implementation makes further use of parallel features of the open source… ▽ More Symbolic variants of clause distribution using decision diagrams to eliminate variables in SAT were shown to perform well on hard combinatorial instances. In this paper we revisit both existing ZDD and BDD variants of this approach. We further investigate different heuristics for selecting the next variable to eliminate. Our implementation makes further use of parallel features of the open source BDD library Sylvan. △ Less

Submitted 9 May, 2018; originally announced May 2018.

Local Redundancy in SAT: Generalizations of Blocked Clauses

Authors: Benjamin Kiesl, Martina Seidl, Hans Tompits, Armin Biere

Abstract: Clause-elimination procedures that simplify formulas in conjunctive normal form play an important role in modern SAT solving. Before or during the actual solving process, such procedures identify and remove clauses that are irrelevant to the solving result. These simplifications usually rely on so-called redundancy properties that characterize cases in which the removal of a clause does not affect… ▽ More Clause-elimination procedures that simplify formulas in conjunctive normal form play an important role in modern SAT solving. Before or during the actual solving process, such procedures identify and remove clauses that are irrelevant to the solving result. These simplifications usually rely on so-called redundancy properties that characterize cases in which the removal of a clause does not affect the satisfiability status of a formula. One particularly successful redundancy property is that of blocked clauses, because it generalizes several other redundancy properties. To find out whether a clause is blocked---and therefore redundant---one only needs to consider its resolution environment, i.e., the clauses with which it can be resolved. For this reason, we say that the redundancy property of blocked clauses is local. In this paper, we show that there exist local redundancy properties that are even more general than blocked clauses. We present a semantic notion of blocking and prove that it constitutes the most general local redundancy property. We furthermore introduce the syntax-based notions of set-blocking and super-blocking, and show that the latter coincides with our semantic blocking notion. In addition, we show how semantic blocking can be alternatively characterized via Davis and Putnam's rule for eliminating atomic formulas. Finally, we perform a detailed complexity analysis and relate our novel redundancy properties to prominent redundancy properties from the literature. △ Less

Submitted 23 October, 2018; v1 submitted 17 February, 2017; originally announced February 2017.

Journal ref: Logical Methods in Computer Science, Volume 14, Issue 4 (October 24, 2018) lmcs:3152

Blocked Clauses in First-Order Logic

Authors: Benjamin Kiesl, Martin Suda, Martina Seidl, Hans Tompits, Armin Biere

Abstract: Blocked clauses provide the basis for powerful reasoning techniques used in SAT, QBF, and DQBF solving. Their definition, which relies on a simple syntactic criterion, guarantees that they are both redundant and easy to find. In this paper, we lift the notion of blocked clauses to first-order logic. We introduce two types of blocked clauses, one for first-order logic with equality and the other fo… ▽ More Blocked clauses provide the basis for powerful reasoning techniques used in SAT, QBF, and DQBF solving. Their definition, which relies on a simple syntactic criterion, guarantees that they are both redundant and easy to find. In this paper, we lift the notion of blocked clauses to first-order logic. We introduce two types of blocked clauses, one for first-order logic with equality and the other for first-order logic without equality, and prove their redundancy. In addition, we give a polynomial algorithm for checking whether a clause is blocked. Based on our new notions of blocking, we implemented a novel first-order preprocessing tool. Our experiments showed that many first-order problems in the TPTP library contain a large number of blocked clauses. Moreover, we observed that their elimination can improve the performance of modern theorem provers, especially on satisfiable problem instances. △ Less

Submitted 2 February, 2017; originally announced February 2017.

Concurrent Cube-and-Conquer

Authors: Peter van der Tak, Marijn J. H. Heule, Armin Biere

Abstract: Recent work introduced the cube-and-conquer technique to solve hard SAT instances. It partitions the search space into cubes using a lookahead solver. Each cube is tackled by a conflict-driven clause learning (CDCL) solver. Crucial for strong performance is the cutoff heuristic that decides when to switch from lookahead to CDCL. Yet, this offline heuristic is far from ideal. In this paper, we pres… ▽ More Recent work introduced the cube-and-conquer technique to solve hard SAT instances. It partitions the search space into cubes using a lookahead solver. Each cube is tackled by a conflict-driven clause learning (CDCL) solver. Crucial for strong performance is the cutoff heuristic that decides when to switch from lookahead to CDCL. Yet, this offline heuristic is far from ideal. In this paper, we present a novel hybrid solver that applies the cube and conquer steps simultaneously. A lookahead and a CDCL solver work together on each cube, while communication is restricted to synchronization. Our concurrent cube-and-conquer solver can solve many instances faster than pure lookahead, pure CDCL and offline cube-and-conquer, and can abort early in favor of a pure CDCL search if an instance is not suitable for cube-and-conquer techniques. △ Less

Submitted 18 February, 2014; originally announced February 2014.

Comments: Third International Workshop on Pragmatics of SAT (PoS 2012)

Covered Clause Elimination

Authors: Marijn Heule, Matti Järvisalo, Armin Biere

Abstract: Generalizing the novel clause elimination procedures developed in [M. Heule, M. Järvisalo, and A. Biere. Clause elimination procedures for CNF formulas. In Proc. LPAR-17, volume 6397 of LNCS, pages 357-371. Springer, 2010.], we introduce explicit (CCE), hidden (HCCE), and asymmetric (ACCE) variants of a procedure that eliminates covered clauses from CNF formulas. We show that these procedures are… ▽ More Generalizing the novel clause elimination procedures developed in [M. Heule, M. Järvisalo, and A. Biere. Clause elimination procedures for CNF formulas. In Proc. LPAR-17, volume 6397 of LNCS, pages 357-371. Springer, 2010.], we introduce explicit (CCE), hidden (HCCE), and asymmetric (ACCE) variants of a procedure that eliminates covered clauses from CNF formulas. We show that these procedures are more effective in reducing CNF formulas than the respective variants of blocked clause elimination, and may hence be interesting as new preprocessing/simplification techniques for SAT solving. △ Less

Submitted 23 November, 2010; originally announced November 2010.

Comments: 5 pages

Journal ref: Short paper proceedings of LPAR-17, 17th International Conference on Logic for Programming, Artificial Intelligence and Reasoning, Yogyakarta, Indonesia, October 10th - 15th, 2010

Linear Encodings of Bounded LTL Model Checking

Authors: Armin Biere, Keijo Heljanko, Tommi Junttila, Timo Latvala, Viktor Schuppan

Abstract: We consider the problem of bounded model checking (BMC) for linear temporal logic (LTL). We present several efficient encodings that have size linear in the bound. Furthermore, we show how the encodings can be extended to LTL with past operators (PLTL). The generalised encoding is still of linear size, but cannot detect minimal length counterexamples. By using the virtual unrolling technique min… ▽ More We consider the problem of bounded model checking (BMC) for linear temporal logic (LTL). We present several efficient encodings that have size linear in the bound. Furthermore, we show how the encodings can be extended to LTL with past operators (PLTL). The generalised encoding is still of linear size, but cannot detect minimal length counterexamples. By using the virtual unrolling technique minimal length counterexamples can be captured, however, the size of the encoding is quadratic in the specification. We also extend virtual unrolling to Buchi automata, enabling them to accept minimal length counterexamples. Our BMC encodings can be made incremental in order to benefit from incremental SAT technology. With fairly small modifications the incremental encoding can be further enhanced with a termination check, allowing us to prove properties with BMC. Experiments clearly show that our new encodings improve performance of BMC considerably, particularly in the case of the incremental encoding, and that they are very competitive for finding bugs. An analysis of the liveness-to-safety transformation reveals many similarities to the BMC encodings in this paper. Using the liveness-to-safety translation with BDD-based invariant checking results in an efficient method to find shortest counterexamples that complements the BMC-based approach. △ Less

Submitted 16 November, 2006; v1 submitted 6 November, 2006; originally announced November 2006.

Comments: Final version for Logical Methods in Computer Science CAV 2005 special issue

ACM Class: F.3.1; B.6.3; D.2.4; F.4.1

Journal ref: Logical Methods in Computer Science, Volume 2, Issue 5 (November 15, 2006) lmcs:2236