Generative AI for Analyzing Participatory Rural Appraisal Data: An Exploratory Case Study in Gender Research
Authors:
Srividya Sheshadri,
Unnikrishnan Radhakrishnan,
Aswathi Padmavilochanan,
Christopher Coley,
Rao R. Bhavani
Abstract:
This study explores the novel application of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) in analyzing unstructured visual data generated through Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA), specifically focusing on women's empowerment research in rural communities. Using the "Ideal Village" PRA activity as a case study, we evaluate three state-of-the-art Large Language Models (LLMs) - GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 So…
▽ More
This study explores the novel application of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) in analyzing unstructured visual data generated through Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA), specifically focusing on women's empowerment research in rural communities. Using the "Ideal Village" PRA activity as a case study, we evaluate three state-of-the-art Large Language Models (LLMs) - GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, and Gemini 1.5 Pro - in their ability to interpret hand-drawn artifacts containing multilingual content from various Indian states. Through comparative analysis, we assess the models' performance across critical dimensions including visual interpretation, language translation, and data classification. Our findings reveal significant challenges in AI's current capabilities to process such unstructured data, particularly in handling multilingual content, maintaining contextual accuracy, and avoiding hallucinations. While the models showed promise in basic visual interpretation, they struggled with nuanced cultural contexts and consistent classification of empowerment-related elements. This study contributes to both AI and gender research by highlighting the potential and limitations of AI in analyzing participatory research data, while emphasizing the need for human oversight and improved contextual understanding. Our findings suggest future directions for developing more inclusive AI models that can better serve community-based participatory research, particularly in gender studies and rural development contexts.
△ Less
Submitted 2 February, 2025;
originally announced February 2025.
Exploring Child-Robot Interaction in Individual and Group settings in India
Authors:
Gayathri Manikutty,
Sai Ankith Potapragada,
Devasena Pasupuleti,
Mahesh S. Unnithan,
Arjun Venugopal,
Pranav Prabha,
Arunav H.,
Vyshnavi Anil Kumar,
Rthuraj P. R.,
Rao R Bhavani
Abstract:
This study evaluates the effectiveness of child-robot interactions with the HaKsh-E social robot in India, examining both individual and group interaction settings. The research centers on game-based interactions designed to teach hand hygiene to children aged 7-11. Utilizing video analysis, rubric assessments, and post-study questionnaires, the study gathered data from 36 participants. Findings i…
▽ More
This study evaluates the effectiveness of child-robot interactions with the HaKsh-E social robot in India, examining both individual and group interaction settings. The research centers on game-based interactions designed to teach hand hygiene to children aged 7-11. Utilizing video analysis, rubric assessments, and post-study questionnaires, the study gathered data from 36 participants. Findings indicate that children in both settings developed positive perceptions of the robot in terms of the robot's trustworthiness, closeness, and social support. The significant difference in the interaction level scores presented in the study suggests that group settings foster higher levels of interaction, potentially due to peer influence and collaborative dynamics. While both settings showed significant improvements in learning outcomes, the individual setting had more pronounced learning gains. This suggests that personal interactions with the robot might lead to deeper or more effective learning experiences. Consequently, this study concludes that individual interaction settings are more conducive for focused learning gains, while group settings enhance interaction and engagement.
△ Less
Submitted 4 June, 2024; v1 submitted 2 June, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
