Skip to main content

Showing 1–4 of 4 results for author: Bezou-Vrakatseli, E

Searching in archive cs. Search in all archives.
.
  1. arXiv:2405.18073  [pdf, ps, other

    cs.AI

    Towards Dialogues for Joint Human-AI Reasoning and Value Alignment

    Authors: Elfia Bezou-Vrakatseli, Oana Cocarascu, Sanjay Modgil

    Abstract: We argue that enabling human-AI dialogue, purposed to support joint reasoning (i.e., 'inquiry'), is important for ensuring that AI decision making is aligned with human values and preferences. In particular, we point to logic-based models of argumentation and dialogue, and suggest that the traditional focus on persuasion dialogues be replaced by a focus on inquiry dialogues, and the distinct chall… ▽ More

    Submitted 28 May, 2024; originally announced May 2024.

  2. arXiv:2401.09444  [pdf, other

    cs.AI

    Online Handbook of Argumentation for AI: Volume 4

    Authors: Lars Bengel, Lydia Blümel, Elfia Bezou-Vrakatseli, Federico Castagna, Giulia D'Agostino, Isabelle Kuhlmann, Jack Mumford, Daphne Odekerken, Fabrizio Russo, Stefan Sarkadi, Madeleine Waller, Andreas Xydis

    Abstract: This volume contains revised versions of the papers selected for the fourth volume of the Online Handbook of Argumentation for AI (OHAAI). Previously, formal theories of argument and argument interaction have been proposed and studied, and this has led to the more recent study of computational models of argument. Argumentation, as a field within artificial intelligence (AI), is highly relevant for… ▽ More

    Submitted 20 December, 2023; originally announced January 2024.

  3. arXiv:2309.04352  [pdf, other

    cs.MA

    SHAPE: A Framework for Evaluating the Ethicality of Influence

    Authors: Elfia Bezou-Vrakatseli, Benedikt Brückner, Luke Thorburn

    Abstract: Agents often exert influence when interacting with humans and non-human agents. However, the ethical status of such influence is often unclear. In this paper, we present the SHAPE framework, which lists reasons why influence may be unethical. We draw on literature from descriptive and moral philosophy and connect it to machine learning to help guide ethical considerations when developing algorithm… ▽ More

    Submitted 6 November, 2023; v1 submitted 8 September, 2023; originally announced September 2023.

    Comments: An earlier version of this paper was accepted at EUMAS 2023

  4. arXiv:2212.07996  [pdf, other

    cs.AI

    Online Handbook of Argumentation for AI: Volume 3

    Authors: Lars Bengel, Elfia Bezou-Vrakatseli, Lydia Blümel, Federico Castagna, Giulia D'Agostino, Daphne Odekerken, Minal Suresh Patil, Jordan Robinson, Hao Wu, Andreas Xydis

    Abstract: This volume contains revised versions of the papers selected for the third volume of the Online Handbook of Argumentation for AI (OHAAI). Previously, formal theories of argument and argument interaction have been proposed and studied, and this has led to the more recent study of computational models of argument. Argumentation, as a field within artificial intelligence (AI), is highly relevant for… ▽ More

    Submitted 15 December, 2022; originally announced December 2022.