-
Super Quantum Mechanics
Authors:
Mikhail Gennadievich Belov,
Victor Victorovich Dubov,
Vadim Konstantinovich Ivanov,
Alexander Yurievich Maslov,
Olga Vladimirovna Proshina,
Vladislav Gennadievich Malyshkin
Abstract:
We introduce Super Quantum Mechanics (SQM) as a theory that considers states in Hilbert space subject to multiple quadratic constraints. Traditional quantum mechanics corresponds to a single quadratic constraint of wavefunction normalization. In its simplest form, SQM considers states in the form of unitary operators, where the quadratic constraints are conditions of unitarity. In this case, the s…
▽ More
We introduce Super Quantum Mechanics (SQM) as a theory that considers states in Hilbert space subject to multiple quadratic constraints. Traditional quantum mechanics corresponds to a single quadratic constraint of wavefunction normalization. In its simplest form, SQM considers states in the form of unitary operators, where the quadratic constraints are conditions of unitarity. In this case, the stationary SQM problem is a quantum inverse problem with multiple applications in machine learning and artificial intelligence. The SQM stationary problem is equivalent to a new algebraic problem that we address in this paper. The SQM non-stationary problem considers the evolution of a quantum system, distinct from the explicit time dependence of the Hamiltonian, $H(t)$. Several options for the SQM dynamic equation are considered, and quantum circuits of 2D type are introduced, which transform one quantum system into another. Although no known physical process currently describes such dynamics, this approach naturally bridges direct and inverse quantum mechanics problems, allowing for the development of a new type of computer algorithm. Beyond computer modeling, the developed theory could be directly applied if or when a physical process capable of solving an inverse quantum problem in a single measurement act (analogous to wavefunction measurement in traditional quantum mechanics) is discovered in the future.
△ Less
Submitted 25 January, 2025;
originally announced February 2025.
-
Quantum Channel Learning
Authors:
Mikhail Gennadievich Belov,
Victor Victorovich Dubov,
Alexey Vladimirovich Filimonov,
Vladislav Gennadievich Malyshkin
Abstract:
The problem of an optimal mapping between Hilbert spaces $IN$ and $OUT$, based on a series of density matrix mapping measurements $ρ^{(l)} \to \varrho^{(l)}$, $l=1\dots M$, is formulated as an optimization problem maximizing the total fidelity $\mathcal{F}=\sum_{l=1}^{M} ω^{(l)} F\left(\varrho^{(l)},\sum_s B_s ρ^{(l)} B^{\dagger}_s\right)$ subject to probability preservation constraints on Kraus o…
▽ More
The problem of an optimal mapping between Hilbert spaces $IN$ and $OUT$, based on a series of density matrix mapping measurements $ρ^{(l)} \to \varrho^{(l)}$, $l=1\dots M$, is formulated as an optimization problem maximizing the total fidelity $\mathcal{F}=\sum_{l=1}^{M} ω^{(l)} F\left(\varrho^{(l)},\sum_s B_s ρ^{(l)} B^{\dagger}_s\right)$ subject to probability preservation constraints on Kraus operators $B_s$. For $F(\varrho,σ)$ in the form that total fidelity can be represented as a quadratic form with superoperator $\mathcal{F}=\sum_s\left\langle B_s\middle|S\middle| B_s \right\rangle$ (either exactly or as an approximation) an iterative algorithm is developed. The work introduces two important generalizations of unitary learning: 1. $IN$/$OUT$ states are represented as density matrices. 2. The mapping itself is formulated as a mixed unitary quantum channel $A^{OUT}=\sum_s |w_s|^2 \mathcal{U}_s A^{IN} \mathcal{U}_s^{\dagger}$ (no general quantum channel yet). This marks a crucial advancement from the commonly studied unitary mapping of pure states $φ_l=\mathcal{U} ψ_l$ to a quantum channel, what allows us to distinguish probabilistic mixture of states and their superposition. An application of the approach is demonstrated on unitary learning of density matrix mapping $\varrho^{(l)}=\mathcal{U} ρ^{(l)} \mathcal{U}^{\dagger}$, in this case a quadratic on $\mathcal{U}$ fidelity can be constructed by considering $\sqrt{ρ^{(l)}} \to \sqrt{\varrho^{(l)}}$ mapping, and on a quantum channel, where quadratic on $B_s$ fidelity is an approximation -- a quantum channel is then obtained as a hierarchy of unitary mappings, a mixed unitary channel. The approach can be applied to studying quantum inverse problems, variational quantum algorithms, quantum tomography, and more.
△ Less
Submitted 3 January, 2025; v1 submitted 5 July, 2024;
originally announced July 2024.
-
Partially Unitary Learning
Authors:
Mikhail Gennadievich Belov,
Vladislav Gennadievich Malyshkin
Abstract:
The problem of an optimal mapping between Hilbert spaces $IN$ of $\left|ψ\right\rangle$ and $OUT$ of $\left|φ\right\rangle$ based on a set of wavefunction measurements (within a phase) $ψ_l \to φ_l$, $l=1\dots M$, is formulated as an optimization problem maximizing the total fidelity $\sum_{l=1}^{M} ω^{(l)} \left|\langleφ_l|\mathcal{U}|ψ_l\rangle\right|^2$ subject to probability preservation const…
▽ More
The problem of an optimal mapping between Hilbert spaces $IN$ of $\left|ψ\right\rangle$ and $OUT$ of $\left|φ\right\rangle$ based on a set of wavefunction measurements (within a phase) $ψ_l \to φ_l$, $l=1\dots M$, is formulated as an optimization problem maximizing the total fidelity $\sum_{l=1}^{M} ω^{(l)} \left|\langleφ_l|\mathcal{U}|ψ_l\rangle\right|^2$ subject to probability preservation constraints on $\mathcal{U}$ (partial unitarity). The constructed operator $\mathcal{U}$ can be considered as an $IN$ to $OUT$ quantum channel; it is a partially unitary rectangular matrix (an isometry) of dimension $\dim(OUT) \times \dim(IN)$ transforming operators as $A^{OUT}=\mathcal{U} A^{IN} \mathcal{U}^{\dagger}$. An iterative algorithm for finding the global maximum of this optimization problem is developed, and its application to a number of problems is demonstrated. A software product implementing the algorithm is available from the authors.
△ Less
Submitted 19 November, 2024; v1 submitted 16 May, 2024;
originally announced May 2024.
