-
FACTors: A New Dataset for Studying the Fact-checking Ecosystem
Authors:
Enes Altuncu,
Can Başkent,
Sanjay Bhattacherjee,
Shujun Li,
Dwaipayan Roy
Abstract:
Our fight against false information is spearheaded by fact-checkers. They investigate the veracity of claims and document their findings as fact-checking reports. With the rapid increase in the amount of false information circulating online, the use of automation in fact-checking processes aims to strengthen this ecosystem by enhancing scalability. Datasets containing fact-checked claims play a ke…
▽ More
Our fight against false information is spearheaded by fact-checkers. They investigate the veracity of claims and document their findings as fact-checking reports. With the rapid increase in the amount of false information circulating online, the use of automation in fact-checking processes aims to strengthen this ecosystem by enhancing scalability. Datasets containing fact-checked claims play a key role in developing such automated solutions. However, to the best of our knowledge, there is no fact-checking dataset at the ecosystem level, covering claims from a sufficiently long period of time and sourced from a wide range of actors reflecting the entire ecosystem that admittedly follows widely-accepted codes and principles of fact-checking. We present a new dataset FACTors, the first to fill this gap by presenting ecosystem-level data on fact-checking. It contains 118,112 claims from 117,993 fact-checking reports in English (co-)authored by 1,953 individuals and published during the period of 1995-2025 by 39 fact-checking organisations that are active signatories of the IFCN (International Fact-Checking Network) and/or EFCSN (European Fact-Checking Standards Network). It contains 7,327 overlapping claims investigated by multiple fact-checking organisations, corresponding to 2,977 unique claims. It allows to conduct new ecosystem-level studies of the fact-checkers (organisations and individuals). To demonstrate the usefulness of FACTors, we present three example applications, including a first-of-its-kind statistical analysis of the fact-checking ecosystem, examining the political inclinations of the fact-checking organisations, and attempting to assign a credibility score to each organisation based on the findings of the statistical analysis and political leanings. Our methods for constructing FACTors are generic and can be used to maintain a live dataset that can be updated dynamically.
△ Less
Submitted 14 May, 2025;
originally announced May 2025.
-
Graphical Models of False Information and Fact Checking Ecosystems
Authors:
Haiyue Yuan,
Enes Altuncu,
Shujun Li,
Can Baskent
Abstract:
The wide spread of false information online including misinformation and disinformation has become a major problem for our highly digitised and globalised society. A lot of research has been done to better understand different aspects of false information online such as behaviours of different actors and patterns of spreading, and also on better detection and prevention of such information using t…
▽ More
The wide spread of false information online including misinformation and disinformation has become a major problem for our highly digitised and globalised society. A lot of research has been done to better understand different aspects of false information online such as behaviours of different actors and patterns of spreading, and also on better detection and prevention of such information using technical and socio-technical means. One major approach to detect and debunk false information online is to use human fact-checkers, who can be helped by automated tools. Despite a lot of research done, we noticed a significant gap on the lack of conceptual models describing the complicated ecosystems of false information and fact checking. In this paper, we report the first graphical models of such ecosystems, focusing on false information online in multiple contexts, including traditional media outlets and user-generated content. The proposed models cover a wide range of entity types and relationships, and can be a new useful tool for researchers and practitioners to study false information online and the effects of fact checking.
△ Less
Submitted 24 August, 2022;
originally announced August 2022.
-
A Game Theoretical Semantics for Logics of Nonsense
Authors:
Can Başkent
Abstract:
Logics of non-sense allow a third truth value to express propositions that are \emph{nonsense}. These logics are ideal formalisms to understand how errors are handled in programs and how they propagate throughout the programs once they appear. In this paper, we give a Hintikkan game semantics for logics of non-sense and prove its correctness. We also discuss how a known solution method in game the…
▽ More
Logics of non-sense allow a third truth value to express propositions that are \emph{nonsense}. These logics are ideal formalisms to understand how errors are handled in programs and how they propagate throughout the programs once they appear. In this paper, we give a Hintikkan game semantics for logics of non-sense and prove its correctness. We also discuss how a known solution method in game theory, the iterated elimination of strictly dominated strategies, relates to semantic games for logics of nonsense. Finally, we extend the logics of nonsense only by means of semantic games, developing a new logic of nonsense, and propose a new game semantics for Priest's Logic of Paradox.
△ Less
Submitted 22 September, 2020;
originally announced September 2020.
-
Paraconsistency and Topological Semantics
Authors:
Can Baskent
Abstract:
The well-studied notion of deductive explosion describes the situation where any formula can be deduced from an inconsistent set of formulas. Paraconsistent logic, on the other hand, is the umbrella term for logical systems where the logical consequence relation is not explosive. In this work, we investigate the relationship between some different topological spaces and paraconsistency.
The well-studied notion of deductive explosion describes the situation where any formula can be deduced from an inconsistent set of formulas. Paraconsistent logic, on the other hand, is the umbrella term for logical systems where the logical consequence relation is not explosive. In this work, we investigate the relationship between some different topological spaces and paraconsistency.
△ Less
Submitted 10 November, 2011; v1 submitted 25 July, 2011;
originally announced July 2011.
-
Public Announcement Logic in Geometric Frameworks
Authors:
Can Baskent
Abstract:
In this paper we introduce public announcement logic in different geometric frameworks. First, we consider topological models, and then extend our discussion to a more expressive model, namely, subset space models. Furthermore, we prove the completeness of public announcement logic in those frameworks. Moreover, we apply our results to different issues: announcement stabilization, backward inducti…
▽ More
In this paper we introduce public announcement logic in different geometric frameworks. First, we consider topological models, and then extend our discussion to a more expressive model, namely, subset space models. Furthermore, we prove the completeness of public announcement logic in those frameworks. Moreover, we apply our results to different issues: announcement stabilization, backward induction and persistence.
△ Less
Submitted 18 August, 2011; v1 submitted 25 July, 2011;
originally announced July 2011.
-
Homotopies in Classical and Paraconsistent Modal Logics
Authors:
Can Baskent
Abstract:
Topological semantics for modal logics has recently gained new momentum in many different branches of logic. In this paper, we will consider the topological semantics of both classical and paraconsistent modal logics.
This work is a new step in the research program that focuses on paraconsistent systems from geometric and topological point of view. Here, we discuss the functional transformations…
▽ More
Topological semantics for modal logics has recently gained new momentum in many different branches of logic. In this paper, we will consider the topological semantics of both classical and paraconsistent modal logics.
This work is a new step in the research program that focuses on paraconsistent systems from geometric and topological point of view. Here, we discuss the functional transformations in paraconsistent and classical modal cases: how to transform one classical or paraconsistent topological model to another, how to transform one transformation to another in a validity preserving way. Furthermore, we also suggest a measure to keep track of such change.
△ Less
Submitted 25 July, 2011;
originally announced July 2011.
-
A Logic for Strategy Updates
Authors:
Can Baskent
Abstract:
Notion of strategy in game theory is static and presumably constructed before the game play. The static, pre-determined notion of strategies falls short analyzing perfect information games. Because, we, people, do not strategize as such even in perfect information games - largely because we are not logically omniscient, and we have limited computational power and bounded memory. In this paper, we…
▽ More
Notion of strategy in game theory is static and presumably constructed before the game play. The static, pre-determined notion of strategies falls short analyzing perfect information games. Because, we, people, do not strategize as such even in perfect information games - largely because we are not logically omniscient, and we have limited computational power and bounded memory. In this paper, we focus on what we call move updates where some moves become unavailable during the game. Our goal here is to present a formal framework for move based strategy restrictions extending strategy logic which was introduced by Ramanujam and Simon. In this paper, we present a dynamic version of strategy logic, prove its completeness and decidability along with the decidability of the strategy logic which was an open problem so far. We also present an analysis of centipede by using our logic.
△ Less
Submitted 25 July, 2011;
originally announced July 2011.
-
Some Non-Classical Approaches to the Branderburger-Keisler Paradox
Authors:
Can Baskent
Abstract:
In this paper, we discuss a well-known self-referential paradox in foundational game theory, the Brandenburger - Keisler paradox. We approach the paradox from two different perspectives: non-well-founded set theory and paraconsistent logic. We show that the paradox persists in both frameworks for category theoretical reasons, but, with different properties.
In this paper, we discuss a well-known self-referential paradox in foundational game theory, the Brandenburger - Keisler paradox. We approach the paradox from two different perspectives: non-well-founded set theory and paraconsistent logic. We show that the paradox persists in both frameworks for category theoretical reasons, but, with different properties.
△ Less
Submitted 25 July, 2011;
originally announced July 2011.
