HyperZero: A Customized End-to-End Auto-Tuning System for Recommendation with Hourly Feedback
Authors:
Xufeng Cai,
Ziwei Guan,
Lei Yuan,
Ali Selman Aydin,
Tengyu Xu,
Boying Liu,
Wenbo Ren,
Renkai Xiang,
Songyi He,
Haichuan Yang,
Serena Li,
Mingze Gao,
Yue Weng,
Ji Liu
Abstract:
Modern recommendation systems can be broadly divided into two key stages: the ranking stage, where the system predicts various user engagements (e.g., click-through rate, like rate, follow rate, watch time), and the value model stage, which aggregates these predictive scores through a function (e.g., a linear combination defined by a weight vector) to measure the value of each content by a single…
▽ More
Modern recommendation systems can be broadly divided into two key stages: the ranking stage, where the system predicts various user engagements (e.g., click-through rate, like rate, follow rate, watch time), and the value model stage, which aggregates these predictive scores through a function (e.g., a linear combination defined by a weight vector) to measure the value of each content by a single numerical score. Both stages play roughly equally important roles in real industrial systems; however, how to optimize the model weights for the second stage still lacks systematic study. This paper focuses on optimizing the second stage through auto-tuning technology. Although general auto-tuning systems and solutions - both from established production practices and open-source solutions - can address this problem, they typically require weeks or even months to identify a feasible solution. Such prolonged tuning processes are unacceptable in production environments for recommendation systems, as suboptimal value models can severely degrade user experience. An effective auto-tuning solution is required to identify a viable model within 2-3 days, rather than the extended timelines typically associated with existing approaches. In this paper, we introduce a practical auto-tuning system named HyperZero that addresses these time constraints while effectively solving the unique challenges inherent in modern recommendation systems. Moreover, this framework has the potential to be expanded to broader tuning tasks within recommendation systems.
△ Less
Submitted 29 January, 2025;
originally announced January 2025.
KML: Using Machine Learning to Improve Storage Systems
Authors:
Ibrahim Umit Akgun,
Ali Selman Aydin,
Andrew Burford,
Michael McNeill,
Michael Arkhangelskiy,
Aadil Shaikh,
Lukas Velikov,
Erez Zadok
Abstract:
Operating systems include many heuristic algorithms designed to improve overall storage performance and throughput. Because such heuristics cannot work well for all conditions and workloads, system designers resorted to exposing numerous tunable parameters to users -- thus burdening users with continually optimizing their own storage systems and applications. Storage systems are usually responsibl…
▽ More
Operating systems include many heuristic algorithms designed to improve overall storage performance and throughput. Because such heuristics cannot work well for all conditions and workloads, system designers resorted to exposing numerous tunable parameters to users -- thus burdening users with continually optimizing their own storage systems and applications. Storage systems are usually responsible for most latency in I/O-heavy applications, so even a small latency improvement can be significant. Machine learning (ML) techniques promise to learn patterns, generalize from them, and enable optimal solutions that adapt to changing workloads. We propose that ML solutions become a first-class component in OSs and replace manual heuristics to optimize storage systems dynamically. In this paper, we describe our proposed ML architecture, called KML. We developed a prototype KML architecture and applied it to two case studies: optimizing readahead and NFS read-size values. Our experiments show that KML consumes less than 4KB of dynamic kernel memory, has a CPU overhead smaller than 0.2%, and yet can learn patterns and improve I/O throughput by as much as 2.3x and 15x for two case studies -- even for complex, never-seen-before, concurrently running mixed workloads on different storage devices.
△ Less
Submitted 25 January, 2022; v1 submitted 22 November, 2021;
originally announced November 2021.
